RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      핵심자기평가가 조직유효성에 미치는 영향 : 셀프리더십과 심리적 임파워먼트의 매개효과를 중심으로 = (The) impact of core self-evaluations on the organizational effectiveness : mediating effect of self-leadership and psychological empowerment

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11613989

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        울산 : 울산대학교, 2009

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(박사) -- 울산대학교 대학원 , 경영학과 , 2009

      • 발행연도

        2009

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • KDC

        325.3 판사항(4)

      • DDC

        658.3 판사항(21)

      • 발행국(도시)

        울산

      • 형태사항

        vii장, 131 p. ; 30 cm

      • 일반주기명

        참고문헌: p. 105-123

      • 소장기관
        • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
        • 울산대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This dissertation is an empirical study on the relationships among core self-evaluations, self-leadership, psychological empowerment, and organizational effectiveness. In particular, mediating effect of self-leadership and psychological empowerment on core self-evaluations, self-leadership is empirically analysed to find causes and impacts among these variables.
      In order to achieve the goals of this study, research models were proposed and hypothesis were drawn to test on the basis of previous studies. The research hypothesis was core self-evaluations have effects on organizational effectiveness (job satisfaction and organizational commitment, innovative behavior) and self-leadership and psychological empowerment have mediating effects on this process.
      A survey was conducted to the members of the seven organizations such as banks, stock market, insurance companies, public organizations, educational organizations, manufacturers, and service industry. The survey questionnaires were sent to 550 people and 359 of them were returned. This data was analyzed with SPSS 12.0 and AMOS 5.0.
      The study results are as follows. There were no direct effects of the core self-evaluations on the job satisfaction and the innovative behavior but it had a negative effect on the organizational commitment. The core self-evaluations had a positive effects on the self-leadership and the psychological empowerment. The self-leadership had also a positive effect on the psychological empowerment. The psychological empowerment had a positive effect on the organizational effectiveness. Futhermore, the self-leadership had a positive effect on the innovative behavior but had a negative effect on the job satisfaction and the organizational commitment.
      In addition, there was a full mediating effect of the self-leadership on the core self-evaluations, the job satisfaction and the innovative behavior, and the organizational commitment had only a partial mediating effect. And the psychological empowerment had a full mediating effect on the core self-evaluations, the job satisfaction and the innovative behavior, and the organizational commitment had only a partial mediating effect. Moreover, the psychological empowerment had a partial mediating effect on the self-leadership and the organizational effectiveness.
      This study is significant in that it incorporated the research models of the previous researchers such as Judge (1997), etc., and proposed a new research model and it facilitated our understandings on the attitudes and the innovative behavior of organizational members. Specifically, in this study, the following two models were incorporated: a model that shows the effects of the core self-evaluations on members' attitudes and innovative behavior though situational variables and a model that shows the effects of the core self-evaluations on members' attitudes and innovative behavior though behavioral variables. In particular, the core self-evaluations had effects on the behavioral variable of the self-leadership and the self-leadership had effects on the situational variable, the psychological empowerment. The the psychological empowerment had a positive effect on the members' attitudes and innovative behavior. These results has theoretical implications in that they integrated theories on the variables of core self-evaluations, self-leadership, members' attitudes and innovative behavior and expanded their logical relationships.
      This study has the following practical implications on facilitating members' attitudes and innovative behavior. Considering the fact of respecting humans, organizations should allocate jobs based on individuals' characters' and from the point of developing excellent workers, organizations should introduce and activate flexible personnel management programs such as flexible working hours, sharing work to reconsider the organizations' competitiveness. Seen from creative management standpoints, organizations should provide tired members with opportunities to re-boost and introduce career development programs to develop leaders at every levels. Organizations should also redesign recruiting systems to enhance individuals' capabilities and offer autonomous organizational design to develop change management and self-leadership.
      The directions for future studies are as follows. First of all, mediating roles of core self-evaluation should be investigated to confirm whether the core self-evaluations are situation sensitive or are stable personal traits. Secondly, the further study should test the validity of scales of neuroticism and locus of control in the core self-evaluations. Thirdly, the future study should examine whether autonomy or organizational atmosphere has any effects on self-leadership, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Finally, the relationships among variables resulted from the core self-evaluations should be investigated further. For example, theories on matching a person with a job or with an organizations should be considered. Also the future study should investigate whether self-concordance has mediating effects on the relationships among core self-evaluations, organizational citizenship behavior and turnover intention. In summary, the future study should examine other variables pertinent to self core-evaluations to contribute to developing theories of core self-evaluations.
      번역하기

      This dissertation is an empirical study on the relationships among core self-evaluations, self-leadership, psychological empowerment, and organizational effectiveness. In particular, mediating effect of self-leadership and psychological empowerment on...

      This dissertation is an empirical study on the relationships among core self-evaluations, self-leadership, psychological empowerment, and organizational effectiveness. In particular, mediating effect of self-leadership and psychological empowerment on core self-evaluations, self-leadership is empirically analysed to find causes and impacts among these variables.
      In order to achieve the goals of this study, research models were proposed and hypothesis were drawn to test on the basis of previous studies. The research hypothesis was core self-evaluations have effects on organizational effectiveness (job satisfaction and organizational commitment, innovative behavior) and self-leadership and psychological empowerment have mediating effects on this process.
      A survey was conducted to the members of the seven organizations such as banks, stock market, insurance companies, public organizations, educational organizations, manufacturers, and service industry. The survey questionnaires were sent to 550 people and 359 of them were returned. This data was analyzed with SPSS 12.0 and AMOS 5.0.
      The study results are as follows. There were no direct effects of the core self-evaluations on the job satisfaction and the innovative behavior but it had a negative effect on the organizational commitment. The core self-evaluations had a positive effects on the self-leadership and the psychological empowerment. The self-leadership had also a positive effect on the psychological empowerment. The psychological empowerment had a positive effect on the organizational effectiveness. Futhermore, the self-leadership had a positive effect on the innovative behavior but had a negative effect on the job satisfaction and the organizational commitment.
      In addition, there was a full mediating effect of the self-leadership on the core self-evaluations, the job satisfaction and the innovative behavior, and the organizational commitment had only a partial mediating effect. And the psychological empowerment had a full mediating effect on the core self-evaluations, the job satisfaction and the innovative behavior, and the organizational commitment had only a partial mediating effect. Moreover, the psychological empowerment had a partial mediating effect on the self-leadership and the organizational effectiveness.
      This study is significant in that it incorporated the research models of the previous researchers such as Judge (1997), etc., and proposed a new research model and it facilitated our understandings on the attitudes and the innovative behavior of organizational members. Specifically, in this study, the following two models were incorporated: a model that shows the effects of the core self-evaluations on members' attitudes and innovative behavior though situational variables and a model that shows the effects of the core self-evaluations on members' attitudes and innovative behavior though behavioral variables. In particular, the core self-evaluations had effects on the behavioral variable of the self-leadership and the self-leadership had effects on the situational variable, the psychological empowerment. The the psychological empowerment had a positive effect on the members' attitudes and innovative behavior. These results has theoretical implications in that they integrated theories on the variables of core self-evaluations, self-leadership, members' attitudes and innovative behavior and expanded their logical relationships.
      This study has the following practical implications on facilitating members' attitudes and innovative behavior. Considering the fact of respecting humans, organizations should allocate jobs based on individuals' characters' and from the point of developing excellent workers, organizations should introduce and activate flexible personnel management programs such as flexible working hours, sharing work to reconsider the organizations' competitiveness. Seen from creative management standpoints, organizations should provide tired members with opportunities to re-boost and introduce career development programs to develop leaders at every levels. Organizations should also redesign recruiting systems to enhance individuals' capabilities and offer autonomous organizational design to develop change management and self-leadership.
      The directions for future studies are as follows. First of all, mediating roles of core self-evaluation should be investigated to confirm whether the core self-evaluations are situation sensitive or are stable personal traits. Secondly, the further study should test the validity of scales of neuroticism and locus of control in the core self-evaluations. Thirdly, the future study should examine whether autonomy or organizational atmosphere has any effects on self-leadership, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Finally, the relationships among variables resulted from the core self-evaluations should be investigated further. For example, theories on matching a person with a job or with an organizations should be considered. Also the future study should investigate whether self-concordance has mediating effects on the relationships among core self-evaluations, organizational citizenship behavior and turnover intention. In summary, the future study should examine other variables pertinent to self core-evaluations to contribute to developing theories of core self-evaluations.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      본 연구는 핵심자기평가, 셀프리더십, 심리적 임파워먼트, 그리고 조직유효성과의 관련성에 대하여 종합적으로 실증분석을 하였다. 특히 핵심자기평가와 조직유효성과의 관계에 있어서 셀프리더십과 심리적 임파워먼트의 매개역할과 이들 간의 인과관계를 중심으로 실증분석을 하였다.
      본 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해서 연구모델을 제안하고 연구가설을 설정하였으며 선행연구에 근거한 가설을 검증하였다. 제안된 연구모형을 살펴보면 핵심자기평가는 조직유효성(직무만족 및 조직몰입, 혁신행동)에 영향을 미치며, 이 과정에서 셀프리더십과 심리적 임파워먼트가 매개변수로 사용되었다.
      본 연구를 위해서 울산광역시에 소재한 은행업, 증권업, 보험업, 공공기관, 교육기관, 제조업, 기타 서비스업 등 총 7개 업종에 근무하고 있는 조직구성원을 대상으로 설문조사를 하였다. 총 550부의 설문지를 배포하여 359부가 본 연구에 사용되었다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS 12.0과 AMOS 5.0을 사용하여 통계분석 하였다.
      연구결과는 다음과 같다. 핵심자기평가는 직무만족과 혁신행동에 직접 영향을 미치지 않았으며, 조직몰입에는 부(-)의 유의한 영향을 주었다. 핵심자기평가는 셀프리더십과 심리적 임파워먼트에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셀프리더십은 심리적 임파워먼트에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 심리적 임파워먼트는 조직유효성에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 셀프리더십은 혁신행동에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나, 직무만족과 조직몰입에는 부(-)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.
      한편, 핵심자기평가와 조직유효성 간에 셀프리더십과 심리적 임파워먼트의 매개역할을 검증한 결과, 셀프리더십은 핵심자기평가와 직무만족 및 혁신행동간에 완전매개를 수행하는 것으로 나타났고, 조직몰입은 부분매개를 수행하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 심리적 임파워먼트는 핵심자기평가와 직무만족 및 혁신행동간에 완전매개를 수행하는 것으로 나타났고, 조직몰입은 부분매개를 수행하는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 심리적 임파워먼트는 셀프리더십과 조직유효성간에 부분매개를 수행하는 것으로 나타났다.
      본 연구는 Judge 등(1997)이 제안한 연구모형을 통합하고 새로운 모형을 제시하였으며 조직구성원의 태도 및 혁신행동에 대한 이해를 촉진하였다. 즉, 핵심자기평가가 상황적 변수를 통해 구성원의 태도 및 혁신행동에 영향을 주는 모형과 행동적 변수를 통해 구성원의 태도 및 혁신행동에 영향을 주는 모형을 통합하였다. 특히 핵심자기평가가 행동적 변수인 셀프리더십에 영향을 미치고 셀프리더십은 상황적 변수인 심리적 임파워먼트에 영향을 주었으며, 심리적 임파워먼트는 구성원의 태도 및 혁신행동에 유의한 정(+)의 영향을 주었다. 이러한 결과는 핵심자기평가, 셀프리더십, 심리적 임파워먼트, 그리고 구성원의 태도 및 혁신행동 변수들 간의 이론을 통합하고 그 논리를 확대하였다는 점에서 이론적 시사점이 있다고 할 수 있다.
      또한 실무적으로 구성원의 태도 및 혁신행동을 촉진하기 위해 다음과 같은 시사점을 제공할 수 있다. 인간존중차원에서 개인의 특성에 맞는 직무설계 및 인력배치, 우수인재 발굴 및 양성 차원에서 유연시간 근무제, 직무공유 등과 같은 유연한 인력운용 프로그램 도입 및 활성화, 조직의 경쟁력 제고와 창조경영 차원에서 구성원들에게 지친 심신을 재충전할 기회를 부여, 조직의 각 계층의 리더 육성차원에서 경력개발 활동 프로그램 도입, 개인의 능력을 극대화하기 위해 개인선발시스템 등을 재설계, 그리고 변화관리 및 셀프리더십을 함양하기 위해 자율적인 조직재설계 등을 제공할 수 있다.
      향후 연구방향으로는 다음과 같이 제안할 수 있다. 먼저, 핵심자기평가의 매개역할을 검증할 필요가 있다. 핵심자기평가가 환경을 받아들일 수 있는지 혹은 안정적인 개인특성변수인지를 확인해야 한다. 둘째, 핵심자기평가에 포함된 통제위치와 신경증의 척도의 타당성을 검증해야 한다. 셋째, 셀프리더십과 직무만족 및 조직몰입 간에 자율성 혹은 조직분위기가 조절역할을 하는지에 대한 연구가 요구된다. 마지막으로, 핵심자기평가와 결과변수 간의 다양한 변수를 찾으려는 노력이 필요하다. 예를 들어 사람-직무 부합, 사람-조직 부합 이론 등의 매개역할과 조절역할을 고려해야 한다. 또한 핵심자기평가와 조직시민행동, 이직의도 등과의 관계에서 자기일치성이 매개역할을 수행하는지를 검토해야 한다. 따라서 미래연구는 이들 변수들 이외에 다양한 변수들을 고려하여 핵심자기평가의 이론을 발전시키는데 기여하여야 할 것이다.
      번역하기

      본 연구는 핵심자기평가, 셀프리더십, 심리적 임파워먼트, 그리고 조직유효성과의 관련성에 대하여 종합적으로 실증분석을 하였다. 특히 핵심자기평가와 조직유효성과의 관계에 있어서 셀...

      본 연구는 핵심자기평가, 셀프리더십, 심리적 임파워먼트, 그리고 조직유효성과의 관련성에 대하여 종합적으로 실증분석을 하였다. 특히 핵심자기평가와 조직유효성과의 관계에 있어서 셀프리더십과 심리적 임파워먼트의 매개역할과 이들 간의 인과관계를 중심으로 실증분석을 하였다.
      본 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해서 연구모델을 제안하고 연구가설을 설정하였으며 선행연구에 근거한 가설을 검증하였다. 제안된 연구모형을 살펴보면 핵심자기평가는 조직유효성(직무만족 및 조직몰입, 혁신행동)에 영향을 미치며, 이 과정에서 셀프리더십과 심리적 임파워먼트가 매개변수로 사용되었다.
      본 연구를 위해서 울산광역시에 소재한 은행업, 증권업, 보험업, 공공기관, 교육기관, 제조업, 기타 서비스업 등 총 7개 업종에 근무하고 있는 조직구성원을 대상으로 설문조사를 하였다. 총 550부의 설문지를 배포하여 359부가 본 연구에 사용되었다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS 12.0과 AMOS 5.0을 사용하여 통계분석 하였다.
      연구결과는 다음과 같다. 핵심자기평가는 직무만족과 혁신행동에 직접 영향을 미치지 않았으며, 조직몰입에는 부(-)의 유의한 영향을 주었다. 핵심자기평가는 셀프리더십과 심리적 임파워먼트에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셀프리더십은 심리적 임파워먼트에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 심리적 임파워먼트는 조직유효성에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 셀프리더십은 혁신행동에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나, 직무만족과 조직몰입에는 부(-)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.
      한편, 핵심자기평가와 조직유효성 간에 셀프리더십과 심리적 임파워먼트의 매개역할을 검증한 결과, 셀프리더십은 핵심자기평가와 직무만족 및 혁신행동간에 완전매개를 수행하는 것으로 나타났고, 조직몰입은 부분매개를 수행하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 심리적 임파워먼트는 핵심자기평가와 직무만족 및 혁신행동간에 완전매개를 수행하는 것으로 나타났고, 조직몰입은 부분매개를 수행하는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 심리적 임파워먼트는 셀프리더십과 조직유효성간에 부분매개를 수행하는 것으로 나타났다.
      본 연구는 Judge 등(1997)이 제안한 연구모형을 통합하고 새로운 모형을 제시하였으며 조직구성원의 태도 및 혁신행동에 대한 이해를 촉진하였다. 즉, 핵심자기평가가 상황적 변수를 통해 구성원의 태도 및 혁신행동에 영향을 주는 모형과 행동적 변수를 통해 구성원의 태도 및 혁신행동에 영향을 주는 모형을 통합하였다. 특히 핵심자기평가가 행동적 변수인 셀프리더십에 영향을 미치고 셀프리더십은 상황적 변수인 심리적 임파워먼트에 영향을 주었으며, 심리적 임파워먼트는 구성원의 태도 및 혁신행동에 유의한 정(+)의 영향을 주었다. 이러한 결과는 핵심자기평가, 셀프리더십, 심리적 임파워먼트, 그리고 구성원의 태도 및 혁신행동 변수들 간의 이론을 통합하고 그 논리를 확대하였다는 점에서 이론적 시사점이 있다고 할 수 있다.
      또한 실무적으로 구성원의 태도 및 혁신행동을 촉진하기 위해 다음과 같은 시사점을 제공할 수 있다. 인간존중차원에서 개인의 특성에 맞는 직무설계 및 인력배치, 우수인재 발굴 및 양성 차원에서 유연시간 근무제, 직무공유 등과 같은 유연한 인력운용 프로그램 도입 및 활성화, 조직의 경쟁력 제고와 창조경영 차원에서 구성원들에게 지친 심신을 재충전할 기회를 부여, 조직의 각 계층의 리더 육성차원에서 경력개발 활동 프로그램 도입, 개인의 능력을 극대화하기 위해 개인선발시스템 등을 재설계, 그리고 변화관리 및 셀프리더십을 함양하기 위해 자율적인 조직재설계 등을 제공할 수 있다.
      향후 연구방향으로는 다음과 같이 제안할 수 있다. 먼저, 핵심자기평가의 매개역할을 검증할 필요가 있다. 핵심자기평가가 환경을 받아들일 수 있는지 혹은 안정적인 개인특성변수인지를 확인해야 한다. 둘째, 핵심자기평가에 포함된 통제위치와 신경증의 척도의 타당성을 검증해야 한다. 셋째, 셀프리더십과 직무만족 및 조직몰입 간에 자율성 혹은 조직분위기가 조절역할을 하는지에 대한 연구가 요구된다. 마지막으로, 핵심자기평가와 결과변수 간의 다양한 변수를 찾으려는 노력이 필요하다. 예를 들어 사람-직무 부합, 사람-조직 부합 이론 등의 매개역할과 조절역할을 고려해야 한다. 또한 핵심자기평가와 조직시민행동, 이직의도 등과의 관계에서 자기일치성이 매개역할을 수행하는지를 검토해야 한다. 따라서 미래연구는 이들 변수들 이외에 다양한 변수들을 고려하여 핵심자기평가의 이론을 발전시키는데 기여하여야 할 것이다.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 국문초록 = i
      • 제 1 장 서론 = 1
      • 제 1 절 문제의 제기 및 연구의 목적 = 1
      • 1.1 문제의 제기 = 1
      • 1.2 연구의 목적 = 3
      • 국문초록 = i
      • 제 1 장 서론 = 1
      • 제 1 절 문제의 제기 및 연구의 목적 = 1
      • 1.1 문제의 제기 = 1
      • 1.2 연구의 목적 = 3
      • 제 2 절 연구의 범위와 방법 및 구성 = 4
      • 2.1 연구의 범위 = 4
      • 2.2 논문의 구성 = 4
      • 제 2 장 이론적 배경 = 6
      • 제 1 절 핵심자기평가의 개념 = 6
      • 1.1 핵심자기평가의 정의 = 6
      • 1.2 핵심자기평가의 중요성 = 8
      • 제 2 절 핵심자기평가의 배경 및 특성 = 10
      • 2.1 핵심자기평가의 배경 = 10
      • 2.2 핵심자기평가의 특성 = 13
      • 제 3 절 핵심자기평가의 구성개념과 실증적 연구 = 19
      • 3.1 핵심자기평가의 구성개념과 직무만족 및 성과에 관한 연구 = 20
      • 3.2 핵심자기평가에 관한 연구 = 27
      • 제 4 절 셀프리더십 = 38
      • 4.1 셀프리더십의 개념 = 38
      • 4.2 셀프리더십의 이론적 배경 = 41
      • 4.3 셀프리더십에 관한 선행연구 = 45
      • 제 5 절 심리적 임파워먼트 = 47
      • 5.1 심리적 임파워먼트의 개념 = 47
      • 5.2 심리적 임파워먼트의 정의 및 구성요인 = 48
      • 5.3 심리적 임파워먼트에 관한 선행연구 = 52
      • 제 6 절 조직유효성 = 54
      • 6.1 조직유효성의 개념과 측정지표 = 54
      • 6.2 직무만족 = 55
      • 6.3 조직몰입 = 57
      • 6.4 혁신행동 = 59
      • 제 3 장 연구의 설계 = 61
      • 제 1 절 연구모형 = 62
      • 제 2 절 연구가설 = 62
      • 2.1 핵심자기평가와 셀프리더십과의 관계 = 62
      • 2.2 핵심자기평가와 심리적 임파워먼트와의 관계 = 63
      • 2.3 셀프리더십과 심리적 임파워먼트와의 관계 = 64
      • 2.4 심리적 임파워먼트와 조직유효성과의 관계 = 65
      • 2.5 셀프리더십과 조직유효성과의 관계 = 66
      • 2.6 핵심자기평가와 조직유효성과의 관계 = 69
      • 2.7 핵심자기평가와 조직유효성과의 관계에서 셀프리더십의 매개효과 = 71
      • 2.8 핵심자기평가와 조직유효성과의 관계에서 심리적 임파워먼트의 매개효과 = 72
      • 2.9 셀프리더십과 조직유효성과의 관계에서 심리적 임파워먼트의 매개효과 = 73
      • 제 3 절 변수의 조작적 정의 및 측정도구 = 74
      • 제 4 절 연구방법 = 77
      • 4.1 설문지의 구성 = 77
      • 4.2 자료수집 및 분석방법 = 77
      • 제 4 장 실증분석 및 결과 = 79
      • 제 1 절 기초통계분석 = 79
      • 1.1 기초통계분석 = 79
      • 제 2 절 신뢰성 및 타당성 분석 = 81
      • 2.1 신뢰성 및 타당성 분석 = 81
      • 제 3 절 가설검증 = 84
      • 3.1 확인적 요인분석 = 84
      • 3.2 가설검증 및 결과분석 = 87
      • 제 5 장 결론 및 토의 = 95
      • 제 1 절 연구결과 요약 및 해석 = 95
      • 제 2 절 연구의 시사점 = 97
      • 2.1 이론적 시사점 = 97
      • 2.2 실무적 시사점 = 99
      • 제 3 절 연구의 한계점 및 향후 과제 = 101
      • 3.1 연구의 한계점 = 101
      • 3.2 향후 과제 = 103
      • 참고문헌 = 105
      • 설문지 = 124
      • Abstract = 129
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1. Innovation at work, Farr, West, Innovation at work, , 1990

      2. 인간존중경영, 신유근, , 2007

      3. Psychometric Theory, Pummer, Psychometric Theory, , 2000

      4. Self-esteem and work, Locke, Knight, McClear, , 1996

      5. New super leadership:, Sims, Manz, , 2001

      6. Social learning theory, Bandura, Albert, Prentice Hall, Social Learning Theory, , 1977

      7. Personnel Administration, Sthahl, , 1976

      8. An Index of Job Satisfaction, Ormrod, , 1951

      9. Meaning of Occupational Work, Brief, W.R.Nord, , 1990

      10. Industrial Psychology(6th ed.), 박영애, Industrial Psychology(6th ed, , 1974

      1. Innovation at work, Farr, West, Innovation at work, , 1990

      2. 인간존중경영, 신유근, , 2007

      3. Psychometric Theory, Pummer, Psychometric Theory, , 2000

      4. Self-esteem and work, Locke, Knight, McClear, , 1996

      5. New super leadership:, Sims, Manz, , 2001

      6. Social learning theory, Bandura, Albert, Prentice Hall, Social Learning Theory, , 1977

      7. Personnel Administration, Sthahl, , 1976

      8. An Index of Job Satisfaction, Ormrod, , 1951

      9. Meaning of Occupational Work, Brief, W.R.Nord, , 1990

      10. Industrial Psychology(6th ed.), 박영애, Industrial Psychology(6th ed, , 1974

      11. Industrial psychology (7th ed.), McCormick, E. J, , 1980

      12. Leadership without easy answers, Heifetz, Ronald A, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, , 1994

      13. A Model of Work Team Empowerment, Rosen, Kirman, A model of work team empowerment, , 1997

      14. Organizational Behavior, 12th ed, Judge, Robbins, "Organizational Behavior, , 2007

      15. On the self-regulation of behavior, Carver, Charles S, Cambridge University Press, On the self-regulation of behavior, , 1998

      16. The leadership challenge, (2nd ed), Posner, Kouzes, "The leadership challenge, , 1995

      17. Is empowerment really a new concept?, Koh, Lee, , 2001

      18. Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.), Hair, J. F., Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.), , 1998

      19. Leadership for the Twenty-First Century, Rost, Leadership for the twenty-first century, , 1993

      20. Leadership in organizations 5th Edition, Yukl, , 2001

      21. Points of Power can Help Self-Leadership, Blenchard, , 1995

      22. Creativity, intelligence, and personality, Barron, Harrington, "Creativity, , 1981

      23. Does mental practice enhance performance?, Moran, Driskell, , 1994

      24. Interpretation of educational measurement, Kelly, , 1927

      25. Self-Determination in a Work Organization, 정영란, Self-determination in a work organization, , 1989

      26. Innovation amongsthealth careprofessionals, West, Innovation amongst health care professionals, , 1989

      27. Management Challenges for the 21st Century, Drucker, Management challenges for the 21st century, , 1999

      28. An interactionist model ofcreative behavior, Schoenfelt, Woodman, An interactionist model of creative behavior, , 1990

      29. Towarda theory of organizational creativity, Woodman, Griffin, , 1993

      30. Potency in groups : articulating a construct, Campbell, Guzzo, Yost, Shea, Potency in groups: Articulating a construct, , 1993

      31. Assessing the work environment for creativity, Amabile, M.Herron, R.Conti, , 1996

      32. CentralProblems in the Management ofInnovation, Van de ven, Central problems in the management of innovation, , 1986

      33. Putting People First forOrganizational Success, Veiga, Pfeffer, Putting people first for organizational success, , 1999

      34. On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Bagozzi, On the evaluation of structural equation models, , 1988

      35. Personality as a predictor of the value of voice, Avery, , 2003

      36. 근로자의 감정성향에 따른 이직의향, 한광현(Han Kwang-Hyun), 대한경영학회, "대한경영학회지, , 2003

      37. 호텔부서간 갈등과 조직유효성 연구, 강성관, 호텔 부서간 갈등과 조직유효성 연구, , 2007

      38. An evaluation of a generalized self-efficacy scale, Lennings, , 1994

      39. Avoidance personal goals and subjective well-being, Church, Elliot, Sheldon, , 1997

      40. Leadership, self-management and levels of analysis, Guzzo, "Leadership, , 1998

      41. Motivation reconsidered: The concept of confidence, White, , 1959

      42. The Search for Integrity: A Leadership ImpactStudy, Eisenberg, , 2000

      43. Two decades of self-leadership theory and research, Neck, Houghton, Two decades of self-leadership theory and research, , 2006

      44. Self-esteem at work : research, theory, and practice, Brockner, Joel, Lexington Books, "Self-esteem at work: Research, , 1988

      45. 리더십 유형과 조직유효성에 관한 연구, 곽영환, , 1997

      46. 개인 혁신 행동의 영향요인에 관한 연구, 백영미, 이화여자대학교 대학원, 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문, , 1998

      47. 임파워먼트: 개념정리 및 실천방안 모색, 박원우, , 1977

      48. Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work, Carmeli, Weisberg, Meitar, , 2006

      49. Situational leadership after 25 years: A retrospective, Zigarmi, Nelson, Blanchard, , 1993

      50. Organizationalstructureand performance:A criticalreview, Porter, , 1980

      51. Problem in the outcomes of organizational effectiveness, Steers, , 1975

      52. Self-Control: Power to the Person. Books Cole, Monterey, Thoresen, Mahoney, "Self-Control: Power to the Person. Books Cole, , 1974

      53. Organizational and team commitment in a team environment, Bishop, Scott, , 2000

      54. The Empowerment Process : IntegratingTheory and Practice, J.A.Conger, R.N.Kanungo, The empowerment process integrating theory and practice, , 1988

      55. Substitutes for Leadership: Their Meaning and Measurement, John M.Jermier, Kerr, Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement, , 1978

      56. The core self-evaluations scale: Development of a measure, Judge, Erez, Bono, Thoresen, , 2003

      57. Academic success among students at risk for school failure, Rock, Finn, , 1997

      58. Thought self-leadership: Mind management for entrepreneurs, Neck, Manz, , 1997

      59. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, Deci, Edward L, Plenum, Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, , 1985

      60. Solid ground in the wetlands of personality: A reply to block, McCrae, Costa, Costa, P. T., , 1995

      61. 이슈리더십과 성과간의 관계에 관한 실증연구, 이재희, 國民大學校 大學院, 국민대학교 박사학위논문, , 2006

      62. 집단응집력과 조직유효성의 관계에 관한 연구, 이종법, 양재생, 한국인적자원관리학회, , 2005

      63. Capitalizing on one's advantages: Role of core self-evaluations, Judge, Hurst, , 2007

      64. Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual, Scott, Bruce, , 1994

      65. A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment,, Allen N. J. & Meyer J. P, A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment, , 1991

      66. Empowerment in organization: How to spark exceptional performance, J.E, Vogt, Murrell, , 1990

      67. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D.Dunnette (Ed.), Locke, "The nature and causes of job satisfaction, , 1976

      68. 외식업의 리더십, 임파워먼트와 조직유효성 연구, 김세리, 경기대학교 대학원, 경기대학교 박사학위논문, , 2005

      69. Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes and consequences, Spector, "Job satisfaction: Application, , 1997

      70. Rumors of the death ofdispositional research are vastly exaggerated, House, Herold, Rumors of the death of dispositional research are vastly exaggerated, , 1996

      71. Coping with stress: Divergent strategies of optimists and pessimists, Scheier, Weintraub, Carver, , 1986

      72. Core self-evaluations as a source of work-motivation and performance, Erez, , 1997

      73. Personal causation : the internal affective determinants of behavior, DeCharms, Richard, Academic Press, Personal Causation: The Internal affective Determinants of Behavior, , 1968

      74. Core self-evaluations and job burnout: The test of alternative models, Best, Stapleton, Downey, , 2005

      75. 리더십이 직무스트레스와 조직유효성에 미치는 영향, 이덕근, 성균관대학교 대학원, 성균관대학교 박사학위논문, , 2008

      76. Mastering self-leadership : empowering yourself for personal excellence, Manz, Charles C, Prentice Hall, Mastering Self-Leadership: Empowering Yourself for Personal Excellence, , 1999

      77. Getting to the core of core self-evaluation: A review and recommendations, Johnson, Rosen, Levy, , 2007

      78. Managerial Coping With Organizational Change: A Dispositional Perspective, Timothy, Carl J.Thoresen, , 1999

      79. Predictors and outcomes of openness to change in a reorganizing workplace, J.T.Banas, Wanberg, , 2000

      80. Self-Efficacy:A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability, 정영선, Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability, , 1992

      81. The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach, Locke, Judge, Durham, , 1997

      82. Concept Redundancy in Organizational Research: The Case of Work Commitment, Morrw, Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment, , 1983

      83. Core self-evaluations as a moderator of the jobstress-burnout relationship, Boyd, Core self-evaluations as a moderator of the job stress-burnout relationship, , 2006

      84. Empowerment in the Indian hotel industry: The role of employee personality, Jha, Nair, , 2006

      85. On the heritability of job satisfaction: The mediating role of personality, Ilies, Judge, , 2003

      86. People in Organization: An introduction to organizational behavior(3rd ed), J.R, Mitchell, Larson Jr, People in organization: An introduction to organizational behavior(3rd ed, , 1988

      87. 분배공정성에 따른 직무부담과 혁신적 업무행동의 관계, 이지우, , 2002

      88. Mastering self-leadership:Empowering yourselfforpersonalexcellence(3rd ed.), Neck, Manz, Mastering Self-Leadership: Empowering Yourself for Personal Excellence. 3rd ed, , 2004

      89. Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics, Bono, Judge, Locke, , 2000

      90. The measurement of generalized self-efficacy: A study of construct validity, Worthington, Tipton, , 1984

      91. Differential engagement of self??reactive influences in cognitive motivation, Bandura, Cervone, Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation, , 1986

      92. Bandwidth-Fidelity Dilemma in Personality Measurement for Personnel Selection, Ones, Viswesvaran, Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection, , 1996

      93. Comparison of transitory and chronic loners on selected personality variables, Hojat, , 1983

      94. Dispositional affect and job satisfaction: A review and theoretical extension, Judge, R.J.Larsen, , 2001

      95. Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning perspective, Manz, Sims Jr.H.P, Self-management as a substitute for leadership a social learning perspective, , 1980

      96. T he Relation ship BetweenSelf- efficacy and Performan ce : A Meta -Analy sis, Hy son g Sylv ia J .an d Migu el A.Quin on es, , 1998

      97. Thought self-leadership: Finding spiritual fulfillment in organizational life, Milliman, Neck, , 1994

      98. Behavioral self-management (BSM): The missing link in managerial effectiveness, Davis, Luthans, , 1979

      99. Puttingcreativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinatecreativity, Teach, Redmond, Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity, , 1993

      100. The self-leadershipquestionnaire: Preliminary assessment of construct validity, Prussia, Anderson, The self-leadership questionnaire: Preliminary assessment of construct validity, , 1997

      101. Constructive thought strategies and job satisfaction: A preliminary examination, Houghton, Jinkerson, Constructive thought strategies and job satisfaction: A preliminary examination, , 2007

      102. Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort-reward Fairness and Innovative Work Behavior, Jassen, "Job demands, , 2000

      103. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Bonnett, Bentlet, Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures, , 1980

      104. Understanding responsesTomulti-source feedback:The role ofcore self-evaluations, Colbert, Bono, Understanding responses to multi-source feedback: The role of core self-evaluations, , 2005

      105. Self Regulation for ManagerialEffectiveness: The Role of Active Feedback Seeking, Ashford, Anne S.Tsui, Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking, , 1991

      106. Self-management and self-leadership reexamined: A levels of analysis perspective, Markham, , 1998

      107. 조직구성원의 심리적 임파워먼트가 직무만족에 미치는 영향, 이용탁, 김종관, 대한경영학회, , 2002

      108. Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive psychological states, Clark, Watson, , 1984

      109. Investments and involvements as mechanisms producingcommitment to the organization, Gaby, Dawn, Wulf, Investments and involvements as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization, , 2001

      110. Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance, Erez, Judge, "Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, , 2001

      111. Self-leadership and performance outcomes: The mediating influence of self-efficacy, Prussia G. E. Anderson J. S. & Manz C. C, Self-leadership and performance outcomes: The mediating influence of self-efficacy, , 1998

      112. Investigating mediators of the core self-evaluations: Job satisfaction relationship, Spitzmuller, , 2003

      113. Organizational Innovation A Meta?analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators, Damanpour, F., Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, , 1991

      114. Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation, Spritzer, "Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, , 1995

      115. 대학생의 셀프 리더십 개발에 영향을 미치는 학습자 변인 연구, 김민정, 이화여자대학교 대학원, 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문, , 2007

      116. Cognitive Elements of Empowerment:An"Interpretive Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation, Wiggins, Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation, , 1990

      117. Thought Self-leadership: TheInfluence of Self-talk and Mental Imagery on Performance, Manz, Neck, Thought self-leadership: The influence of self-talk and mental imagery on performance, , 1992

      118. 직무특성과 혁신행동간 창의성의 매개효과에 대한 탐색적 연구, 송병식(Song Byeong-Sik), 대한경영학회, "대한경영학회지, , 2005

      119. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two??step approach, Anderson, Gerbing, Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, , 1988

      120. Leading workers to lead themselves:The external leadership of self-managing work teams, Manz, Sims, Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams, , 1987

      121. Organizationalcommitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians, Bolian, Steers, "Organizational commitment, , 1974

      122. Thoughtself-leadershipasaframeworkforenhancing theperformanceof performance appraisers, Manz, Stewart, Neck, , 1995

      123. 경영자에 대한 신뢰의 형성요인과 종업원 태도 및 행동과의 관계, 이상갑, 서강대학교, 서강대학교 박사학위논문, , 2006

      124. Effect of dysfunctional thought processes on subjective well-being and job satisfaction, Judge, Locke, , 1993

      125. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Fomell C. and Larcker D.F, , 1981

      126. Self-leadership: toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations, Manz, Sims, Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations, , 1986

      127. Toward a model of shared leadership and distributed influence in the innovation process, Pearce, Perry, Cox, , 2003

      128. 골프장의 서비스 지향성과 조직유효성 및 경영성과간의 인과관계, 이관호, 단국대학교, 단국대학교 박사학위논문, , 2008

      129. 핵심자기평가가 직무만족과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 양필석, 남중헌, 김해룡, , 2008

      130. Goal striving. need satisfaction, andlongitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model, Sheldon, Ellot, "Goal striving, , 1999

      131. The art of self-leadership : strategies for personal effectiveness in your life and work, Manz, Charles C, Prentice-Hall, The Art of Self-Leadership: Strategies for Personal Effectiveness in your Life and work, , 1983

      132. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents andrelationship to creative performance, Farmer, Tierney, Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance, , 2002

      133. Employee self-management withoutformally designed team: an alternative road to empowerment, Shipper, Manz, Employee self-management without formally designed team: An alternative road to empowerment, , 1992

      134. Is the job satisfaction-job performance relationship spurious? A meta-analytic examination, Bowling, , 2007

      135. The power of being positive:The relation between positive self-concept and job performance, Erez, Bono, Judge, The power of being positive: The relation between positive self-concept and job performance, , 1998

      136. What should we do about motivationtheory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century, Locke, La tham, What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century, , 2004

      137. 중소기업의 전략적 인적자원관리와 조직유효성의 관계에 관한 연구, 이현도, 한남대학교 일반대학원, 한남대학교 박사학위논문, , 2008

      138. The impact ofthought self-leadership on individual goal performance: Acognitive perspective, Houghton, Godwin, Neck, , 1999

      139. 조직공정성과 혁신행동과의 관계에서 심리적 임파워먼트의 매개효과, 양필석, 송정수, , 2008

      140. Managing at the speed of change : how resilient managers succeed and prosper where others fail, Conner, Daryl R, Villard, , 1992

      141. The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work, Pearce, , 2004

      142. The influence of transformational leadership and core self-evaluations on individual creativity, Wang, Cheng, Farh, , 2005

      143. Core-self evaluations: A review ofthe trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance, Judge, Bono, Core self-evaluations: A review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance, , 2003

      144. Dispositional causes of task satisfaction: The mediating role of chosen level of task complexity, Locke, Srivastava, Judge, , 2002

      145. The relationship between core self-evaluations and satisfaction: Finding the mediating variables, Taylor, , 2004

      146. 셀프리더십과 혁신행동과의 관계에서 조직몰입의 매개효과에 관한 연구, 송정수, 양필석, , 2008

      147. 직무만족, 조직몰입, 성과, 이직의도 간의 관련성: 문 헌고찰 및 메타분석, 오인수 공저, "직무만족, , 2007

      148. On the nature of organizational effectiveness. in P. S. Goodman, J. M. Penningss & Associates(ed.), Campbell, "On the nature of organizational effectiveness. in P. S. Goodman, , 1977

      149. The Animosity Model ofForeign Product Purchase: An Empirical Test in the People's Republicof China, M.D.Morris, Klein, R.Ettenson, , 1998

      150. Self-concordance at Work: Toward Understanding the Motivational Effects of Transformational Leaders, Timothy A.Judge, Bono, Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders, , 2003

      151. Evaluating the interaction between self-leadership and work structure in predicting job satisfaction, Foti, Roberts, , 1998

      152. The forgotten follower: A contingency model of leadership of leadership and follower self-leadership, Cox, Yun, Sims, , 2006

      153. 직무만족과 조직몰입의 조직시민행동에 대한 매개역할에 관한 탐색적 연구, 박봉규, 송경수, 최만기, 한국인사·조직학회, "인사·조직연구, , 1999

      154. The measurement and antecedents of affective,continuance and normative commitment to the organization, Allen, N. J., "The measurement and antecedents of affective, , 1990

      155. The revised self-leadership questionnaire:Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership, Prussia G. E. Anderson J. S. & Manz C. C, The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership, , 1998

      156. Thought self-leadership: A self-regulatory approach to overcoming resistance to organizational change, Neck, , 1996

      157. 핵심자기평가와 혁신행동과의 관계에서 셀프리더십의 매개효과에 관한 연구, 김해룡(Kim Hae-Ryong), 양필석(Yang Pil-Seok), 대한경영학회, , 2008

      158. Perceived control by employees: a meta-analysis of studiesconcerning autonomy and participation at work, Spector, P. E, Spector, Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work, , 1986

      159. A causal, dispositional model of common personal characteristics associated with teacher job satisfaction, Rice, Jon Kirk, University of Southern California, "A causal, , 2003

      160. Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (hyper-) core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making, Hiller, Hambrick, , 2005

      161. Contribution research can make in understanding organizational effectiveness: Organizational effectiveness, Campbell, , 1976

      162. Thought self-leadership: The impactof mental strategies training on employee cognition, behaviorand affect, Neck, Manz, "Thought self-leadership: The impact of mental strategies training on employee cognition, , 1996

      163. Genetic and environmental contributions to individual differences: The three major dimensions of personality, Eysenck, , 1990

      164. Towardacontingencymodelofleadership and psychological empowerment: when shouldself-leadership be encouraged?, Houghton, Yoho, Toward a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: When should self-leadership be encouraged?, , 2005

      165. 조직문화와 하위문화의 적합성 및 응집성이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 신형재, , 2000

      166. 핵심자기평가가 혁신행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 - 직무만족을 매개변인으로, 김해룡(Kim Hae-Ryong), 양필석(Yang Pil-Seok), 한국인적자원관리학회, , 2008

      167. The role of organizational justice in pay and employee benefit satisfaction, and its effects on work attitudes, Tremblay, Sire, Balkin, "The role of organizational justice in pay and employee benefit satisfaction, , 2000

      168. Self-leadership behavioral-focused strategies and team performance: The mediating influence of job satisfaction, John, , 2006

      169. The confounding role of personality and trait affectivity in the relationship between job and life satisfaction, Judge, Heller, Watson, , 2002

      170. 호텔종사원의 변혁적 리더십과 셀프리더십이 임파워먼트와 직무성과에 미치는 영향, 박봉규, 이상동, 대한관광경영학회, 동의대학교 박사학위논문, , 2008

      171. Emotional stability, core self-evaluations, and outcomes: A review of the evidence and agenda for future research, Van Vianen, De Pater, Judge, "Emotional stability, , 2004

      172. Bridging ethics and self-leadership: Overcoming ethical discrepancies between employee and organizational standards, Neck, VanSandt, , 2003

      173. Is job(dis) satisfaction contagious? Simutaneous effects of social networks, task characteristics, and dispositions, Newman, "Is job(dis) satisfaction contagious? Simutaneous effects of social networks, , 2004

      174. The use of personality measures in cross-cultural research: A test of three personality scales across two countries, Ghorpade, Lackritz, Hattrup, , 1999

      175. 온라인 거래의 신뢰형성 영향요인에 관한 연구: 사회적 실재감의 매개효과를 중심으로, 박주식, , 2006

      176. Team structure and performance:assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating roleof task type, Stewart, Barrick, Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type, , 2000

      177. The impact of leader-member exchange quality, empowerment, and core self-evaluation on nurse manager's job satisfaction, Laschinger, Almost, "The impact of leader-member exchange quality, , 2007

      178. Maximizing organizational leadership capacity for the future: The impact of self-leadership on innovation and creativity, DiLiello, , 2006

      179. 주도성과 핵심자기평가가 경력성공에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 경력계획을 매개변인으로, 탁진국, 이동하, 한국산업및조직심리학회, , 2008

      180. 외식업 조리종사자의 참여적 작업시스템이 셀프리더십, 직무 만족, 조직 몰입에 미치는 영향, 오영섭 ( Young Sub Oh ), 한국조리학회, "외식업 조리종사자의 참여적 작업시스템이 셀프리더십, , 2008

      181. 중소기업 환경에서의 합목적적 정보시스템 활용을 위한 최종사용자 피드백 탐색행위의 중요성, 이주량, 이호근, 신영미, , 2007

      182. 항공사 중간관리자의 리더십이 종업원의 심리적 임파워먼트, 직무만족, 조직몰입에 미치는 영향, 석기현, "항공사 중간관리자의 리더십이 종업원의 심리적 임파워먼트, , 2003

      183. Examination of the relationships among general and work-specific self-evaluations, work-related control beliefs, and job attitudes, Goddard, Casper, Chen, "Examination of the relationships among general and work-specific self-evaluations, , 2004

      184. Measuring organizationalperformance in strategic human resource management problems,prospects, and performance information markets, Rogers, Wright, "Measuring organizational performance in strategic human resource management: Problems, , 1998

      185. The Relationship between self-leadership andself-initiated Change, Leadership: Personal Empowermentfor Emergent Organizational Change, Wirth, The relationship between self-leadership and self-initiated change leadership: Personal empowerment for emergent organizational change, , 2004

      186. Social status of teaching In: L.W. Anderson, (Eds.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education, (pp. 58-61). (2nd ed, Hoyle, "Social status of teaching In: L.W. Anderson, , 1995

      187. An empirical investigation of sources of application-specific computer-self-efficacy and mediators of the efficacy-performance relationship, Johnson, , 2005

      188. Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification and internalization on prosocial behavior, Chatman, O'Relly, "Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, , 1986

      189. Evaluating core self-evaluations: Application of a multidimensional, latent-construct, evaluative framework to core self-evaluations research, Self, "Evaluating core self-evaluations: Application of a multidimensional, , 2007

      190. Understanding creativity in the workplace: An examination of individual styles and training in relation to creative confidence and creative self-leadership, Young, Phelan, , 2003

      191. Inmates as leaders: Validating an instrument for evaluating a consumer directed model for empowerment and rehabilitation in the correctional services in Jamaica, Rhone, , 2007

      192. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits ?self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability? with job satisfaction and job performance:A meta-analysis, Judge, T. A., "Relationship of core self-evaluations traits -self-esteem, , 2001

      193. Personality correlates of the five-factor model for a sample of business owners/managers: Associations with score on self-monitoring, type A behavior, locus of control, and subjective well-being, Morrison, "Personality correlates of the five-factor model for a sample of business owners/managers: Associations with score on self-monitoring, , 1997

      194. The relationship between leader core self-evaluations, team feedback, leader efficacy, transformational leadership, team efficacy, team goals, team action and transition processes, and team performance, Quigley, "The relationship between leader core self-evaluations, , 2003

      195. A confirmatory factor analysis of the core self-evaluations construct and exploratory factor analysis of the Abercrombie self-evaluation construct measure and Epstein(2001) constructive thinking inventory, Abercrombie, , 2005

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼