통합적 접근에 기초한 창의성 모형 개발 및 타당화 = The Development and Verification of Creativity Model(CAPE) based on Confluence Approach

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to verify the structural model reflecting a relationship between the creativity structural model (CAPE) and students' academic grades.
To attain this purpose, the researcher presented the creativity model, which was developed by theoretical backgrounds and previous researches related to the confluence approach of creativity. This study was conducted through three parts of research: study Ⅰ, Ⅱ and study Ⅲ. The Study I was to investigate theories and characteristics of Creativity based on confluence approach, and to propose Creativity Model. Study Ⅱ was a development and a validity of the creativity scale developed by the researcher. The scale was designed to integrate with the previous researches of the confluence approach of creativity. Study Ⅲ was to show model fit of CAPE and a relationship between CAPE and students' academic grades.
The purpose of the study Ⅰ was to investigate theories and characteristics of Creativity based on confluence approach, and to propose Creativity Model. To win the purpose, this research analyzed the merits and faults of existing creativity theories, and suggested the creativity model of macroscopic viewpoints. Through the analysis, the creativity model will substantially explain the individual differences related to creativity and extend the range of understanding on the creativity.
The purpose of the study Ⅱ was to develop and validate the creative disposition, environment, and process scale (C-DEPs) in accordance with confluence approach to creativity. Based on the theoretical background and the preceding studies, confluence approach to creativity includes three constructs of creative disposition, creative environment, and creative process. The scale consists of 124 items over 13 sub-component groups.
Subjects of this study were 221 upper grade elementary students selected by stratified sampling. 217 of them (123 males, 94 females) took the test. Through exploratory factor analysis, 68 items were employed in the tests, excluding items which have low factor loading (〈 .4), interfere internal consistency (Cronbach α), and fail to satisfy uni-dimensionality. Reliability in each sub-component group, except openness, was satisfactory. Multicollinearity diagnosis, evidence base on test content, concurrent evidence of test-criterion relationships, and confirmatory factor analysis (evidence base on internal structure) prove the creative disposition, environment, and process scale(C-DEPs) a reliable tool. Values and limitations of this study were discussed.
The purpose of the study Ⅲ was to develop CAPE and to verify the model of structure between elementary students' grade and their creativity. The study was conducted with 1021 upper grade elementary school students whose schools place in Daegu City and Gyeongsangbuk-do. 790 out of 1021 students' data were analyzed because some responses were not enough to analyze (425 males and 365 females).
The scales of this study were TTCT A-type, intelligence test, C-DEPs, test for enhancing of intrinsic motivation. The grade was a mean of 9 subjects: Korean, Arithmetic, Social Studies, Science, Ethics, Physical Education, Music, Fine Arts and Practical Arts, converted into a standardized score. All data were analyzed via SPSSwin 14.0 version and AMOS 5.0.
As the result of the analysis, the model fit of creativity model, CAPE, showed a statistically significant value of χ2 (χ2=437.508; df=205, p=.000). Q value which shows fit of a model when it's value is smaller than 3 was 2.134. The values of Absolute Fit Measures were like these: RMR = 1.948, GFI = .955 and RMSEA = .038 , and the values of Incremental Fit Measures were NFI = .954, TLI = .969 and CFI = .975. Also, Critical Ratio (C.R.) was bigger than 1.96, and it was supported that most casual relationships in the structural model are statistically significant.
Therefore, it was identified that CAPE was an appropriate creativity model and the structures of the model did significant interactions with one another. The factor which has the biggest effect on the academic grade was cognitive ability (.87). Intelligence was the best sub-factor representing in cognitive ability factor (.74), affect disposition in emotion factor (.87), home background in environmental factor (.74), and inner-process in process factor (.81).
The conclusions of this study are following:
1. C-DEPs, creativity scale, which was developed using the re-interpretation of confluence approach of creativity can be said to bea good creativity scale.
2. CAPE is a proper creativity model which is explained through a confluence approach of creativity. Most path coefficients in the model were significant, and there were significant positive correlation among the factors in CAPE.
3. The structural model explained the relationship between creativity and the academic grade is suitable. The direct, indirect and total effects in the model were significant and there were significant positive correlations among the factors in the model. It was shown that cognitive ability, a sub-factor of creativity, had the biggest effect on creativity.
The researcher would like to suggest as following. It is more desirable that education for cultivation of creativity is organized and practiced being in harmony with cognition, emotion, environment and process. It needs to avoid the creativity education focused on only one ability or skill. When teachers and parents do their best to activate interactions among the factors of creativity, the creativity education will be something for children. They need to help children have various experiences for deeper and wider thinking and reflection both in school and in home. Because it takes a lot of time for creativity to cultivate and for creativity education to obtain desired results, teachers and parents need to continue to do their effort and cooperation for the same object.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
• 2. 연구의 목적 = 3
• 3. 연구 문제 = 4
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
• 1. 창의성의 개념과 정의 = 5
• 2. 창의성 이론: 다원론적 관점을 중심으로 = 7
• 가. Amabile의 요소모델 = 8
• 나. Csikszentmihalyi의 체계론적 관점 = 10
• 다. Isaksen과 Puccio 그리고 Treffinger의 생태학적 모델 = 12
• 라. Sternberg와 Lubart의 투자이론 = 14
• 마. Urban의 창의성 요소모형 = 16
• 바. Ward와 Smith 그리고 Finke의 Geneplore모형 = 19
• 사. Woodman과 Schoenfeldt의 상호작용모델 = 21
• 아. 국내연구 = 22
• 3. 연구가설 = 27
• Ⅲ. 연구 Ⅰ: 통합 창의성 모형 개발 = 28
• 1. 창의성 모형의 필요성과 한계 = 28
• 가. 인지적 차원의 한계 = 29
• 나. 정의적 차원의 한계 = 30
• 다. 환경적 차원의 한계 = 31
• 라. 산물 평가의 한계 = 32
• 2. 통합 창의성 모형의 구안 = 34
• 가. 인지적 능력 = 35
• 나. 정의적 특성 = 45
• 다. 과정특성 = 52
• 라. 환경요인 = 57
• 마. 통합 창의성 모형 = 65
• 3. 통합 창의성 모형의 의의 = 69
• Ⅳ. 연구 Ⅱ : 창의적 성향·환경·과정척도의 개발 및 타당화 = 74
• 1. 문제제기 = 74
• 2. 척도개발 근거 = 75
• 3. 연구방법 = 81
• 4. 연구결과 = 83
• 5. 논의 = 90
• Ⅴ. 연구 Ⅲ : 통합 창의성 모형의 타당화 = 93
• 1. 연구방법 = 93
• 가. 연구대상 = 93
• 나. 측정도구 = 93
• 다. 자료수집 = 97
• 라. 자료분석 = 97
• 2. 연구결과 = 98
• 3. 논의 = 114
• Ⅵ. 종합 논의 = 118
• Ⅶ. 결론 = 128
• 참고문헌 = 129
• 영문초록 = 150
• 부록 = 153

참고문헌 (Reference)

1. Synectics, Gordon, , 1961

2. Mental leaps, Holyak, Thagard, , 1995

3. Creating mind, Dowling, J. E., , 1998

4. 인간의 지능, 황정규, 서울: 민음사, , 1999

5. 창의성의 별, 박영태, , 2002

6. Way beyond the IQ, Guilford, Way Beyond the IQ, , 1977

7. The art of thought, Wallas,Graham, Harcourt,Brace, , 1926

8. The act of creation, Koestler, Koestler, A., , 1964

9. The Creative Process, Ghiselin, The creative process, , 1952

10. The mind's best work, Perkins, David N, Harvard University Press, The mind's best work, , 1981

11. Creativity and culture, Stein, Creativity and culture, , 1953

12. Handbook of creativity, Sternberg, Robert J, Cambridge University Press, , 1999

13. How to study geography, Parker, , 1905

14. On creative experience, Schachtel, , 1971

15. The road to excellence, Ericsson, , 1996

16. Differential psychology, Minton, Henry L, Brooks/Cole Pub. Co., , 1980

17. Guiding creative talent, Torrance, E. Paul (Ellis Paul), Robert E. Krieger Pub. Co., Guiding Creative talent, , 1976

18. Investing in creativity, Lubart, Sternberg, , 1996

19. Successful intelligence, Sternberg, R. J., Successful intelligence, , 1997

20. Dimensions of creativity, Treffinger, D. J., , 1996

21. Expertise and giftedness, Elshout, , 1990

22. Kreativitaet und Technik, Facaoaru, , 1985

23. Teaching gifted children, Gallagher, , 1985

24. The big T in personality, Farley, , 1986

25. Understanding creativity, Simon, , 1967

26. 300 eminent personalities, Goertzel, , 1978

27. An analysis of creativity, Rhodes, , 1961

28. Beyond literal similarity, Ortony, , 1979

29. Growing up gifted(3rd ed), Clark, B., , 1988

30. Theprinciplesofpsychology, James, , 1890

31. 창의성교육의 기반, 박병기, 교육과학사, , 1998

32. 창의적 사고의 본질, 박권생 ( Kwon Saeng Park ), 한국심리학회, "한국심리학회지 일반, , 1993

33. Creative behavior guidebook, Parnes, Sidney Jay, Scribner, Creative behavior guidebook, , 1967

34. Rewarding creative behavior, Torrance, , 1965

35. The new art of the possible, Poze, Gordon, , 1980

36. Lost: Our intelligence? Why?, McNemar, , 1964

37. The Encyclopedia of Education, Clegg, A.A. Jr., , 1971

38. Comprehending complex concepts, Murphy, , 1988

39. The formation of learning sets, Harlow, , 1949

40. Creativity is forever (4th ed.), Davis, Creativity is forever(4th ed.), , 1998

41. Psychological Testing(5th. ed.), Anastasi, Psychological testing(5th ed), , 1982

42. Synectics. In S. A. Olsen (Ed.), Prince, , 1982

43. Marking the creative leap beyond, Safter, Torrance, , 1999

44. The Nature of human intelligence, Guilford, J. P., McGraw-Hill, , 1967

45. 사고와 문제해결 심리학, 김영채, 사고와 문제해결심리학, , 1996

46. 창의성-사람, 환경, 전략, 이경화, "창의성 - 사람, , 2005

47. Discourse on novelty and creation, Hausman, , 1984

48. Fundamentals of creative thinking, Dacey, , 1989

49. Remembering in and out of context, Smith, , 1979

50. Torrance TTCT 언어검사 요강, 김영채, , 2002

51. 창의성 구조 모형의 검증, 김혜숙, 최인수, 한국교육심리학회, "교육심리연구, , 2002

52. Reconstruction in philosophy. In J, Dewey, , 1920

53. 세계영재학술대회 발표물, Urban, , 1995

54. 창의성- 요소적 접근 모델, Urban, 조석희, Klaus K, , 1996

55. (AMOS) 구조방정식 모형분석, 김계수, 데이타솔루션, , 2001

56. Creativity : genius and other myths, Weisberg, Robert W, W.H. Freeman, Creativity: Genius and other myths, , 1986

57. Extending the concept of creativity, Motamedi, , 1982

58. Modes of thinking in young children, Kogan, Wallach, , 1965

59. Psychological sources of creativity, Taylor, I. A., Taylor, , 1973

60. Toward a Hindu theory of creativity, Hallman, , 1970

61. 창의성과 학습동기의 관계, 강현숙, 박병기, 이영신, , 2006

62. 창조적인 문제해결력 교육, 전경원, , 1995

63. Creative person and creative process, Barron, Frank X., Holt, Rinehart and Winston, , 1969

64. The Search for Satori and Creativity, Torrance E.P, , 1979

65. Why fly?: A philosophy of creativity, Torrance, E. J., , 1995

66. 통합적 창의성 모형의 구성, 김명숙, 한국교육심리학회, "교육심리연구, , 2001

67. In search of the creative personality, Helson, , 1996

68. The two-conditions view of creativity, Mollou, , 1996

69. 주 5일 수업제의 쟁점과 실태, 이윤미, , 2005

70. 창의력 : 그 심리, 인물, 사회, 정범모, 교육과학사, "창의력 - 그 심리, , 2001

71. 창의성연구:다원적 접근방법, 전경원, 창의성 연구: 다원적 접근방법, , 2005

72. An introduction to theories of learning, Hergenhahn, B. R., Prentice Hall, An Introduction to theories of learning, , 2001

73. Creativity and cross-cultural variation, Lubart, , 1990

74. 창의성에 대한 심리학적 고찰, 문병상 ( Byung Sang Mun ), 이명자 ( Myung Ja Lee ), , 2003

75. GIFT: Group Inventory for Finding Talent, Rimm, , 1976

76. The nature and nature of creative talent, Mckinnon, , 1962

77. 표준화 간편 창의성 검사 요강, 이영덕, 정원식, , 1995

78. A structural model of scientific eminence, Feist, , 1993

79. Creativity, intelligence, and personality, Barron, Harrington, "Creativity, , 1981

80. More ways than one : fostering creativity, Cropley, A. J, Ablex Pub., , 1992

81. The psychoeconomic approach to creativity, Runco, Rubenberg, , 1992

82. 창의성의 구성요인과 훈련효과, 이인순, 한국초등무용학회, 성균관대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 1997

83. Comparative fit indexes in structure model, Bentler, , 1990

84. Identification of Creativity theIndividual, Gaier, Dellas, Identification of creativity: The individual, , 1970

85. In frumious pursuit of the creative person, Davis, , 1975

86. 유아의 놀이성과 창의성의 관계, 김준희, 박정옥, 한국아동교육학회, "유아교육, , 2000

87. An interactionist model ofcreative behavior, Schoenfelt, Woodman, An interactionist model of creative behavior, , 1990

88. Child development: Play is serious business, Bruner, , 1975

89. Creating the Climate andCulture, of Success, Schneider, , 1994

90. A chronometric study of mental paper folding, Shepard, Feng, , 1972

91. Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Smith, Finke, Ward, , 1999

92. Greatness and limitations of Freud's thought, Fromm, , 1980

93. No rootless flower: An ecological creativity, Barron, , 1995

94. The associative basis of the creativeprocess, Mendick, , 1962

95. Theories of developmental psychology (2nd ed), Miller, , 1989

96. The evolving systems approach to creative Work, Gruber, The evolving systems approach to creative work, , 1989

97. Creativity, intelligence and intellectual style, Cropley, "Creativity, , 1972

98. Creativity and personality. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Eysenck, , 1997

99. Creativity syndrome: Integration, and innovation, Mumford, Gustafson, "Creativity syndrome: Integration, , 1988

100. Recent treads in creativity: Research and theory, Urban, , 1990

101. Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized, Sternberg, Robert J, Cambridge University Press, "Wisdom, , 2003

102. An analysis of creativity. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Rhodes, , 1987

103. Creative talent: Their nature, uses and development, Guilford, "Creative talent: Their nature, , 1986

104. Creative cognition: Theory, research and application, Smith, Finke, Ward, "Creative cognition: Theory, , 1996

105. Achieving extraordinary ends : an essay on creativity, Bailin, Sharon, Kluwer Academic Publishers, , 1988

106. Creativity across cultures. In R. J. Sternberg. (Ed.), Lubart, , 1999

107. GIFT an instrument for the identificationof creativity, Davis, Rimm, , 1976

108. The conditions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Hennessey, Amabile, , 1988

109. Toward a theory of creativity. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Rogers, , 1959

110. (개정판) 전국 표준화 지능진단검사 122-형, 이상로, , 1969

111. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, Kline, Rex B, Guilford Press, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, , 1998

112. 창의성 및 지각향성과 학업성취와의 상관, 윤운성, , 1986

113. Growing Up Creative : Nurturing a Lifetime of Creativity, Amabile, Teresa M, Creative Education Foundation, Growing Up Creative - nurturing a lifetime of creativity, , 1992

114. Theories and models of teaching. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), Anderson, , 1995

115. What do we know about creativity?In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Sternberg, Tardif, , 1988

116. A meta-analysis of long-term creativity training programs, Lin, Rose, A meta analysis of long-term creativity training programs, , 1984

117. Creative Thinking in the Decision and Management Sciences, 김정한, 성창섭, , 1991

118. Implicit Theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom, Sternberg, "Implicit theories of intelligence, , 1985

119. Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions, Hampton, , 1987

120. More ways than one: Fostering creativity in the classroom, 이재신, 황계자, 박기현, 이지혜, , 1992

121. The Purdue Creative Thinking Program. In I. S. Sato (Ed.), Feldhusen, , 1983

122. Three-facet model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Sternberg, , 1988

123. Verbal test booklet A: Torrance test of creative thinking, Torrance, , 1974

124. Verbal test booklet B: Torrance test of creative thinking, Torrance, , 1974

125. Problem solving and past experience. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Raaheim, , 1965

126. Teacher' creativity, playfulness, and style of interaction, Sawyers, Graham, DeBord, "Teacher' creativity, , 1989

127. 학업성취도에 대한 창의성의 상대적 예측력, 이정규, 한국교육학회, "교육학연구, , 2004

128. Componential model. In M. A. Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Lubart, "Componential model. In M. A. Runco, , 1999

129. Explorations of creative visual synthesis in mental imagery, Slayton, Finke R.A, , 1988

130. Productive human capital: Learning, creativity and eminence, Stariha, Walberg, "Productive human capital: Learning, , 1992

131. Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual, Torrance E.P, Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual, , 1974

132. Toward a general theory of expertise : prospects and limits, Ericsson, K. Anders, Cambridge University Press, , 1991

133. 영재성의 발달에 영향을 끼치는 가족의 역할, 김정휘, , 2001

134. Creativity and intelligence: Exploration with gifted student, Getzels, Jackson, , 1962

135. 창의성에 대한 다원적 접근과 그 교육적 시사, 정종진, 대구교육대학교 초등교육연구소, "대구교육대학교 초등교육연구 논총, , 2003

136. Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization, Finke, , 1990

137. Effect of system's culture and climate on person's creativity, Kelin, Farr, Tesluk, Tesluk, P. E., , 1997

138. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, Deci, Edward L, Plenum, Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, , 1985

139. Motivation von laienautoren 〔Motivation of hobby authors〕, Petersen, , 1989

140. Comparison of the playfulness of gifted and nongifted children, Barnett, Fiscella, , 1985

141. A theory of personality : the psychology of personal constructs, Kelly, George, W. W. Norton, , 1963

142. Creativity : flow and the psychology of discovery and invention, Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, HarperCollinsPublishers, Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention, , 1996

143. Creativity its discontents. In M. P. Shaw, & M. A. Runco (Eds.), Runco, "Creativity its discontents. In M. P. Shaw, , 1994

144. The creative environment scales: The work environment inventory, Gryskiewicz, Amabile, , 1989

145. 자기보고형 통합 창의성 척도의 개발 및 타당화, 박병기 ( Byung Gee Bak ), 강현숙 ( Hyun Suk Kang ), 한국교육심리학회, , 2006

146. Influence of creativity and intelligence on academic performance, McCabe, , 1991

147. Studies of visual synthesis: Integration of fragments into forms, Thompson, Klatzky, , 1978

148. The assessment of creative program for gifted and talent student, Renzulli, Reis, , 1991

149. LISREL 구조방정식모델 : 이해, 활용 및 프로그래밍, 배병렬, 청람, "LISREL 구조방정식모델: 이해, , 2006

150. Creative thinking and problem solving in gifted education(3rd ed.), Feldhusen, J. F, , 1985

151. 창의적 사고와 문제발견 사고의 연령에 따른 차이, 하주현, 한국교육심리학회, , 2003

152. Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, surveillance, Brackfield, Goldfarb, Amabile, "Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, , 1990

153. Before the gates of excellence : the determinants of creative genius, Ochse, R, Cambridge University Press, , 1990

154. Darwin on man: A psychological study scientific creativity (2nd ed.), Gruber, , 1981

155. Race and sex bias in interpreting creativity test result of children, Grim, Torrance, , 1977

156. Sex differences in creativity among a sample of Jamaican adolescents, Richardson, , 1986

157. A biographical inventory for identifying creativity in adolescent boy, Schaefer, Anastasi, , 1968

158. Creativity in education & learning: A guide for teacher and educators, Cropley, Creativity in education & learning: A guide for teacher and educators, , 2001

159. Defying the crowed: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity, Sternberg, Lubart, , 1995

160. The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education, Cremin, , 1961

161. Theoretical perspective on creative and its facilitation: An overview, Treffinger, Firestien, Sortore, , 1983

162. 창의적 성향?환경?과정 척도(C-DEPs)의 개발 및 타당화, 박상범, 박병기, , 2007

163. Creativity, casuality, and the separation of personality and cognition, Runco, "Creativity, , 1993

164. Fostering creativity in children, K-8: Theory and practice (pp. 71-77), Farley, "Fostering creativity in children, , 2001

165. 종합적 접근에 기초한 아동의 창의성 측정 도구 개발, 김종안, , 1998

166. 심리적 특성복합체로서의 창의성에 대한 탐색적 연구, 유구식, 전북대학교 대학원, 전북대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2006

167. Scientific discovery: Computational explorations of the creative process, Langley, , 1987

168. 지능 및 창의성과 학업성취간의 연구에 대한 메타분석, 송인섭 ( In Sub Song ), 나장함 ( Jang Ham Na ), 한국아동교육학회, 지능 및 창의성과 학업성취간의 연구에 대한 메타분석, , 2006

169. The mechanism of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou, & A. Ortony (Eds.), Gentner, "The mechanism of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou, , 1989

170. Democracy and education. NY: The Macmillan Company. 민주주의와 교육, Dewey, , 1987

171. 초등학생의 창의성과 감성지능 및 학업성취도간의 관계, 윤정륜 ( Jeong Lyoon Yoon ), 박상범 ( Sang Beom Park ), 한국교육심리학회, 경북대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, , 2004

172. Teaching creative behavior: How to evoke creativity in children of all ages, 변순화, 문정화, , 1985

173. Various approaches to and definitions of creativity.In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Taylor, , 1988

174. Concomitant of playfulness in early childhood cognitive abilities and gender, Kleiber, Barnett, , 1982

175. Current approaches used in studying creativity: An exploratory investigation, Csikzentmihaly, Magyari-Beck, Wehner, , 1991

176. What's old about new idea?. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), Ward, "What's old about new idea?. In S. M. Smith, , 1995

177. Instrumental enrichment : an intervention program for cognitive modifiability, Feuerstein, Reuven, University Park Press, Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability, , 1980

178. Intrinsic motivation in successful artists form early adulthood to middle age, Carney, , 1986

179. The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Torrance, , 1988

180. Creativity: A Knowledge base, meta-cognitive skills, and personalities factors, Feldhusen, "Creativity: A knowledge base, , 1995

181. Independence and the creative potential of gifted and exceptionally gifted boy, Runco, Albert, , 1989

182. Measuring non-cognitive variables in research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Stern, , 1968

183. Power of product. In S. C. Isaksen, R. L. Firestien, & D. J. Treffinger (Eds.), Firestien, "Power of product. In S. C. Isaksen, , 1993

184. Creativity and the quest for mechanism. In R. J. Sternberg & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Perkins, "Creativity and the quest for mechanism. In R. J. Sternberg, , 1988

185. Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation, Ward, , 1994

186. Four faces of creativity: The continuing plight of the intellectually underserved, Keating, , 1980

187. Wisdom and its relations to intelligence and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Sternberg, , 1990

188. An ecologicalapproach to creativity research:profiling for creative problemsolving, Treffinger, Isaksen, , 1993

189. Conformity and creative thinking. In H. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Crutchfield, "Conformity and creative thinking. In H. Gruber, , 1962

190. Mental model: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness, Johnson-Laird, "Mental model: Towards a cognitive science of language, , 1983

191. Creative insight and preinventive forms. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Finke, "Creative insight and preinventive forms. In R. J. Sternberg, , 1995

192. Reliability and validity ofa newly constructed multiple-choice creativity instrument, Abedi, Villa, Auzmendi, , 1996

193. Society, culture, and Person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Csikszentmihaly, "Society, , 1988

194. Cognitive styles and experience in solving insight problems: replication and extension, Martinson, , 1995

195. 창의적 사고력과 공간도형지능, 학업성적, 창의적 인성과의 관계, 성은현, "창의적 사고력과 공간도형지능, , 2003

196. Creativity: An idea whose time has come and gone?. In M. A. Runco, & R. S Albert (Eds.), Milgram, "Creativity: An idea whose time has come and gone?. In M. A. Runco, , 1990

197. Understanding Creativity: The interplay of biological, psychological, and social factor, Dacey, Lennon, "Understanding Creativity: The interplay of biological, , 1998

198. Different model in describing, exploring, explaining and nurturing creativity in society, Urban, "Different model in describing, , 1995

199. The Development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale, Besemer, O'Quin, "The Development, , 1989

200. The creative product. In M. Joyce, S. Isaksen, G. Puccio, F. Davidson, & C. Coppage (Eds.), Mackinnon, "The creative product. In M. Joyce, , 1997

201. 고지능 집단과 고창의성 집단에서의 지능, 창의성, 학업성취의 관계, 이신동, "고지능 집단과 고창의성 집단에서의 지능, , 2006

202. Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Csikszentmihalyi, , 1999

203. Successful intelligence : how practical and creative intelligence determine success in life, Sternberg, Robert J, Plume, Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life, , 1996

204. 창의적 성격 특성: 학교교육을 통한 발달경향 및 교과 성적과의 상관, 김영채, 한국교육학회, , 2001

205. Creativity: What are we to measure?. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Brown, "Creativity: What are we to measure?. In J. A. Glover, , 1989

206. Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies, Conti, Coon, Amabile, , 1996

207. Individual Differences in Creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Woodman, Schoenfeldt, "Individual Differences in Creativity. In J. A. Glover, , 1989

208. The identification and measurement of environmental process variables related to intelligence, Wolf, , 1964

209. 창의성 구조 모형을 적용한 창의적 활동 수행집단과 일반 집단의 비교, 김혜숙, 최인수, 한국교육심리학회, "교육심리연구, , 2003

210. 자기규제적 방략훈련과 확산적 사고훈련이 창의성 향상에 미치는 효과, 손향숙, 자기 규제적 방략 훈련과 확산적 사고 훈련이 창의성 향상에 미치는 효과, , 1997

211. 학업성취와 관련된 변인, 인지양식 변인, 창의성 변인에 대한 통합분석, 구병두, 김정규, "학업성취와 관련된 변인, , 1993

212. An analysis of creativity. In M. Joyce, S. Isaksen, G. Puccio, F. Davidson, & C. Coppage (Eds.), Rhodes, "An analysis of creativity. In M. Joyce, , 1997

213. The nature-nature problem in creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynold (Eds.), Vernon, "The nature-nature problem in creativity. In J. A. Glover, , 1989

214. Torrance test of creative thinking; Norms technical manuals. Figural (Streamlined) form A and B, Torrance, , 1990

215. 창의성 교육 프로그램의 유형 및 관련요인이 창의성 향상에 미치는 효과, 김명숙, , 1998

216. Applied imagination : Principles and procedures of creative problem solving (3rd Revised Edition), 신세호, , 1963

217. Measuring cognitive and dispositional characteristics of creativity in elementary school students, Burnett, Proctor, , 2004

218. The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Barsalou, , 1987

219. Age and individual difference in artistic productivity: Trends within a sample of British novelist, Crozier, , 1999

220. Commentary : Reforming School Reform : Comments on Multiple Intelligences : The Theory in Practice, Sternberg, "Commentary: Reforming school reform: Comments on ""Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice", , 1994

221. Encouraging and nurturing creativity in school and workplace. In U. Munander, & C. Semiawan (Eds.), Urban, "Encouraging and nurturing creativity in school and workplace. In U. Munander, , 1996

222. Externalization of mental images and the act of creation. In B. S. Randhawa, & W. E. Coffman (Eds.), Shepard, "Externalization of mental images and the act of creation. In B. S. Randhawa, , 1978

223. Motivation and creativity: Towards a synthesis of structural and energistic approaches to cognition, Csikszentmihalyi, , 1990

224. Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Novick, "Analogical transfer, , 1998

225. Identifying creative student, teaching for creative growth. In G. N. Colangelo, & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Davis, "Identifying creative student, , 2003

226. Torrance test of creative thinking; Manual for scoring and interpreting results. Verbal form A and B, Torrance, , 1990

227. Developing the creative problem solving skills of intermediate age educable mentally retarded student, Gold, , 1981

228. Self-determination theory and facilitation of intrinsicmotivation, social development, and well-being, Ryan, Deci, "Self-determination theory and facilitation of intrinsic motivation, , 2000

229. How language affects the embodied nature of creative cognition. In T. Ward, S. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Gibbs, "How language affects the embodied nature of creative cognition. In T. Ward, , 1997

230. Identity, experience, and career choice among the exceptionally gifted and talented. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Albert, "Identity, , 1990

231. 창의성 개념정립을 위한 탐색적 연구: 한국인의 암시적 창의성 이론을 중심으로, 송인섭, 김혜숙, , 1999

232. A new book at the curve of intelligence, proceedings of the 1956 invitational conference on testing problems, Bayley, "A new book at the curve of intelligence, , 1957

233. Process-analytic of creative capacities: Operations influencing the combination and reorganization processes, Baughman, Mumford, , 1995

234. Effect of sex, intelligence, and style of thinking on creativity: A comparison of gifted and average children, Kershner, Ledger, "Effect of sex, , 1985

235. 창의적 성취와 관련된 제 요인들: 창의성 연구의 최근 모델인 체계모델을 중심으로, 최인수, , 1998

236. Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides, & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Arbuckle, "Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides, , 1996

237. Program for the gifted and talented: Issue concerning minority population. In F. D. Horowitz, & M. O'Brien (Eds.), Baldwin, "Program for the gifted and talented: Issue concerning minority population. In F. D. Horowitz, , 1985

238. The Identification and Measurement of Environmental process variables that are related to educational achievement, Dave, The identification and measurement of environmental process variables that are related to educational achievement, , 1963

239. Creativity and intelligence. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds. Handbook of Creativity (pp. 111-132), Reynold, Haensly, "Creativity and intelligence. In J. A. Glover, , 1989

240. Fixation, incubation, and insight in memory and creative thinking. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), Smith, "Fixation, , 1995

241. The development and validation of a life experience inventory for the identification of creative electrical engineer, Michael, Colson, , 1979

242. 창의력·지능·학력: 창의력과 지능의 상관관계와 그들이 학력에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 신세호, 창의력?지능?학력: 창의력과 지능의 상관관계와 그들이 학력에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, , 1975

243. Suggestive parallels between Kirton's A-1 Theory of creative style and Koestler's Bisociative Theory of the creative act, Mudd, , 1995

244. Personality, situation, and creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds. Handbook of Creativity (pp. 233-242), Martindale, "Personality, , 1989

245. Creative Thinking in the Decision and Management Sciences. South-Western Pub. 창의적 사고: 창의적 의사결정과 경영, 성창섭, Evans, , 1999

246. Toward a model of creativity based upon problem solving in the social sciences. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Means, Voss, "Toward a model of creativity based upon problem solving in the social sciences. In J. A. Glover, , 1989

247. Group inventory for finding interests(GIFFI) Ⅰ and Ⅱ: Instrument for identifying creative potential in the junior and senior high school, Davis, Rimm, , 1982

248. 창의성의 개념과 연구동향. 한순미, 김선, 박숙희, 이경화, 성은현 (공저), 창의성: 사람, 환경, 전략 (pp. 11-44), 성은현, "창의성의 개념과 연구동향. 한순미, , 2005

249. The creative architects. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence: The social psychology of creativity and exceptional achievement (pp. 291-301), Mackinnon, "The creative architects. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), , 1983

250. The relationship of creativity measures to school achievement and to preferred learning and thinking style in a sample of korean high school student, Kim, Michael, , 1995

251. Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving (3rd Revised Edition). Charles Scribner's Sons. 창의력 개발을 위한 교육, Osborn, , 1984

252. Uber stigmata der kreativitat bei mathematiken des 17. bis 19. jahrhunderts 〔On indicators of creativity in mathematician of the 17th to 19th centuries〕, Biermann, , 1985

253. A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynold (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (53-76), Hocerver, Bachelor, "A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, , 1989

254. The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 93-115), Gruber, Wallace, "The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), , 1999