이슈리더십 3차원과 리더십유효성의 관계에 있어 리더집단전형성의 조절효과 검증

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The main purpose of the study is to clarify a leadership perception mechanism from a scenario experiment at the esthesiological point of view in which leadership effectiveness is argued to be significantly affected by how followers perceive presence and behavior of their leader(s). First, we ask how three dimensions of issue leadership (issue creation, issue involving, and issue implementation) are related to leadership effectiveness; experimentally, how leader's cognitive interaction is related to leadership evaluation of the followers. Second, based upon the understanding of the relationship between issue leadership and leadership effective-ness, we ask how significantly leader group prototypicality influences the relationship.
In order to proceed the experiment, we first divide each of three dimensions of issue leadership by two cases (e.g. 'Yes' or 'No') and then generate 8 scenarios by simple combination of all three dimensions. The scenario experiment is done with 340 white collar workers each of whom works for one of the 7 largest Korean conglomerates.
It turns out that three dimensions of issue leadership positively affect leadership effectiveness. For the controlling effects of leader group prototypicality, it is experimentally proven to positively affect issue creation and issue implementation. In other words, as the level of respondents' perception over leader group pro-totypicality gets higher, leader's behavior of issue creation and issue implementation becomes more strongly related to leadership effectiveness.
Finally, we discuss future research agenda after reviewing theoretical and practical implications of our experimental results.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 손승연, "자기희생적 리더십: 리더의 자기희생 시점 차이가 구성원의 반응에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 37 (37): 101-124, 2013

2 신영숙, "이슈리더십이 직무태도와 혁신행동에 미치는 영향: 심리적 임파워먼트의 매개효과, 사회구조적 특성 및 직종의 조절효과, 교육행정조직을 중심으로" 동양대 대학원 2007

3 이재희, "이슈리더십과 성과간의 관계에 관한 실증연구" 국민대학교 대학원 2006

4 김익철, "이슈리더십과 성과 간의 관계에서 이슈실행의 매개효과 검증" 국민대학교 대학원 2012

5 김동산, "이슈리더십과 성과 간의 관계에 대한 임파워먼트의 매개효과검증" 국민대학교 대학원 2014

6 백기복, "이슈리더십" 창민사 2000

7 서수석, "이슈 리더십의 개인결정 요인과 성과변수의 관계에 대한 상황적 맥락의 조절효과 검증" 국민대학교 대학원 2010

8 김익택, "복잡계 과학을 통한 이슈리더십 이론의 실증연구" 국민대학교 대학원 2010

9 백기복, "리더십 리뷰" 창민사 2005

10 Whyte, W. H., "Tne organization man" Simon & Schuster 1956

11 Lord, R. G., "Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box : Extending the cognitive revolution in leadership research" 11 : 551-579, 2000

12 Meindl, J. R., "The romance of leadership and the evaluation of organizational performance" 30 : 90-109, 1987

13 Vroom, V. H., "The new leadership: Managing participation in organizations" Prentice-Hall 1988

14 Hernandez, M., "The loci and mechanisms of leadership : Exploring a more comprehensive view of leadership theory" 22 : 1165-1185, 2011

15 Yorges, S. L., "The effects of leader outcomes on influence, attributions, and perceptions of charisma" 84 : 428-436, 1999

16 Lord, R. G., "The effect of performance cues and leader behavior on questionnaire ratings of leadership behavior" 21 : 27-39, 1978

17 Baron, R. M., "The Moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration" 51 : 1173-1182, 1986

18 Hains, S. C., "Self-categorization and leadership : Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality" 23 : 1087-1100, 1997

19 Meindl, J. R., "Romance of leadership" 30 (30): 78-102, 1985

20 Wu. W. Y., "Role perceptions, personal traits, life styles and leadership: An empirical study of American, Japanese, and Taiwanese female managers" 6 : 19-34, 1997

21 Judd, C. M., "Research methods in social relations" Holt, Linehart and Winston 1991

22 Conger, J, A., "Perceived behavioral attributes of charismatic leadership" 24 : 86-102, 1992

23 Choi, Y., "On the leadership function of self-sacrifice" 9 (9): 475-501, 1998

24 Chang, C. H., "Not all leader-member exchanges are created equal : Importance of leader relational quality" 21 : 796-808, 2010

25 Topakas, A., "Measurement of implicit leadership theories and their effect on leadership processes and outcomes" Aston University 2011

26 Dinh, J. E., "Leadership theory and research in the new millennium : Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives" 25 : 36-62, 2014

27 Lord, R. G., "Leadership process and follower self-identity" Routledge 2004

28 Lord, R. G., "Leadership and knowledge : Symbolic, connectionist, and embodied perspectives" 22 : 207-222, 2011

29 Lord, R. G., "Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance" Unwin Hyman, Inc 1991

30 Vroom, V. H., "Leadership & decision making" University of Pittsburgh Press 1973

31 van Knippenberg, B., "Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness : The moderating role of leader prototypicality" 90 : 25-37, 2005

32 Cicero, L., "Leader group prototypicality and Job satisfication : The moderating role of job stress and team identification" 11 (11): 165-175, 2007

33 Engle, E. M., "Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leadermember exchange" 40 : 988-1010, 1997

34 Offermann, L. R., "Implicit leadership theories : Content, structure, and generalizability" 5 (5): 43-58, 1994

35 Epitropaki, O., "Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories in the wild : Taking stock of informationprocessing approaches to leadership and followership In organizational settings" 24 : 858-881, 2013

36 De Cremer, D., "How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness" 87 (87): 858-866, 2002

37 Felfe, J., "Followers’ personality and the perception of transformational leadership : Further evidence for the similarity hypothesis" 21 (21): 393-410, 2010

38 van Knippenberg, B., "Embodying who we are : Leader group porototypicality and leadership effectiveness" 22 : 1078-1091, 2011

39 Graves, L. M, "Effects of leader persistence and environmental complexity on leadership perceptions; Do implicit beliefs discourage adaptations to complex environments?" 10 (10): 19-36, 1985

40 House, R. J., "Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies" Sage 2004

41 Rosch, E., "Cognition and categorization" Erlbaum 1978

42 Phillips, J. S., "Causal attributions and perceptions of leadership" 28 : 143-163, 1982

43 Nichols, T. W., "Authentic leadership and implicit theory: A normative form of leadership?" 34 (34): 182-195, 2013

44 Byrne, D., "Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcements" 1 : 659-663, 1965

45 Singh, R., "Attitudes and attraction : a new test of the attraction, repulsion and similarity-dissimilarity asymmetry hypotheses" 39 (39): 197-211, 2000

46 백기복, "Anatomy of Issue Leaders' Behaviors" 한국인사관리학회 26 (26): 313-341, 2002

47 Mitchell, T. R., "An emperical test of an attribution model of leaders’ responses to poor performance" 1979

48 Hogg, M. A., "Advances in Experimental Social Psychology" Academic Press 1-52, 2003

49 Lord, R. G., "A test of leadership categorization theory : Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions" 34 : 343-378, 1984

50 Hoffman, E. L., "A taxonomy of event-level dimensions : Implications for understanding leadership process, behavior, and performance" 24 : 558-571, 2013

51 Hogg, M. A., "A Social identity theory of leadership" 5 : 184-200, 2001

52 Platow, M. J., "A Social identity analysis of leadership endorsement : The effects of leader in-group prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness" 27 : 1508-1519, 2001