http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이상훈 평택대학교 신학연구원 1996 신학과 문화 Vol.1996 No.-
The phenomena and trend of recent theological scholarship around the world, without execption in Korea, seem to be heavily focused on the so-called 'marginal' and 'subsidiary' realm. Index of the last few years of '기독교사상'(Ki-dok-kyo-sa-sang)' which can be counted as one of the most famous periodical magazines in korea shows the reality. They have dealt with the political, cultural, and environmental fields of theology with great efforts. But they seems to be in lack of the sincere study and research on the Christian tradition which has been handed down to us with an alive and abundant wisdom. Who shall, then, speak on the tradition? Is the meaning of 'tradition' can be defined a an unified and existential concept? What is the historical and hermeneutical result on the study of concept of tradition? The writer tries to mention about the meaning of 'tradition' in the context of Church history, especially in early Church history at first. Irenaeus and Turtullian are the important figures for the subject. T.E.Turner's concept on 'the patterns in Christian truth' also contributes to build up the thesis. Next part of historical survey is shared for the hermeneutical discussion of the concept of 'tradition' among the contemporary scholars ; Adolf von Harnack, Martin Werner, Bultmann ect. In the second part of the article, the writer tries to define the concept of 'modern trend of theological scholarship' which can be compared to the meaning of 'tradition.' the result and main subjects of the conference which was held in 1983 at Tubingen for the contemporary theological tasks are cautiously discussed. Sociological and theological analysis are used. Last part of the article is equipped for the suggestion. The suggestion includes the right attitude for the contemporary theological scholarship.