http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
P. Oyungerel,김홍진 한국몽골학회 2013 몽골학 Vol.0 No.35
This research aims to analyze the factors determining the export and import between Korea and Mongolia. Data were estimated and analyzed by quarter based time series through unit root tests and regression analysis. As a result, the model that the increase of income in both countries increase the import and the export between the two countries is convincing the most. The variables including the changes in relative prices and the change in exchange rate revealed weak explanatory power, except Mongolia's import equation. Therefore, in order to promote the trade, two countries need to endeavor to increase national income and the investment, and improve the productivity. Also, both countries need to aim at the improvement of competitiveness through the stabilization of macroeconomic variables, especially the stabilization of consumer prices. In Mongolia, the prices of the elements should be stabilized for the price stability.
Political Change and Human Rights Policy in South Korea and Mongolia
Dashdavaa Oyungerel(다시다와 어융게렐),Man-ho HEO(허만호) 충남대학교 사회과학연구소 2015 사회과학연구 Vol.26 No.3
This paper compares the shifts in human rights policy between South Korea and Mongolia based on the Five-Phase “Spiral” model, which explains how the introduction of international human rights norms in a repressive state can improve the human rights situation. According to the spiral model, continuous bilateral and multilateral network pressure, along with the mobilization and strengthening of domestic networks through transnational networks induce “regime change” and human rights policy change in the third phase, “Tactical Concession” and a transfer to the fourth phase, “Prescriptive Status”. South Korea and Mongolia transferred from a developmental dictatorship and socialist one-party dictatorship, respectively, into democratic regimes with outstanding changes in their human rights policies. Yet, when applying the spiral model, this study found a difference in the ‘transnational network pressure’ on each country, which also led to other differences in the ‘formation of the domestic actors’ and ‘sustained links to transnational networks’. As a result, the difference between the two countries which started with the change of human rights policy after the democratization and which is not mentioned in the spiral model, has meant that Mongolia still remains in the “Prescriptive Status” stage, whereas South Korea has moved on to the final phase, “Rule-consistent behavior.”