RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • The roles of coaches in optimizing team functioning in curling

        Jamie Collins,Natalie Durand-Bush 한국코칭능력개발원 2016 International Journal of Coaching Science Vol.10 No.2

        Coaches have been described as teachers, leaders, motivators, managers, and arbitrators (Giges, Petitpas, & Vemacchia, 2004). That said, how coaches fulfill such roles is not well understood. The current study stems from an extensive grounded theory (Charmaz, 2006) research initiative in which factors and strategies contributing to optimal functioning in high performance curling teams were investigated. The purpose of this study was to uncover the various roles of curling coaches in the process of developing high functioning teams based on the perceptions of both coaches and athletes. Participants were members of 19 high performance curling teams (N=78 athletes) and their coaches (N=10). Data were collected from teams of athletes through face-to-face focus group interviews, and from coaches via individual telephone interviews. Results show that coaches played five primary roles: technical/tactical specialist, mediator, manager, facilitator, and motivator. These roles were dependent on athletes’ needs as well as both coaches and athletes’ personal characteristics and competencies. Coaches and athletes’ perceptions regarding these roles sometimes differed, however, both parties reported that coaches sometimes lacked competencies to perform certain roles. Consequently, specific training should be provided to enable coaches to assist athletes in optimizing team functioning in curling.

      • KCI등재

        Communitas and civitas: an idiographic model of consumer collectives

        Nathalie Collins,Jamie Murphy 한국마케팅과학회 2014 마케팅과학연구 Vol.24 No.3

        Variously called consumer collectives, subcultures of consumption, brand communities,consumer tribes and brand cults, consumer collectivism is a rising area ofinterest in scholarly and industry circles. This paper develops an idiographic conceptualmodel for consumer religiosity, specifically those who worship/consume in groups. Producers enjoy the positive market leverage consumer collectives can provide. Collectives develop, maintain and promulgate rituals, traditions, myths andconsumption behaviours. These collectives recruit new users, provide peer support,reinforce the choice to consume the brand and promote the brand to outsiders. Somecollectives produce and engage in product/brand-related events, festivals andpromotions. Generally self-generating and self-sustaining, the collectives do so withlittle support from the producers (Belk & Tumbat, 2005; McAlexander, Schouten, &Koenig, 2002; Muniz & O’Guinn, 2001; Shanker, Cova, & Kozinets, 2007). The model’s foundation derives from the work of the American philosopher JamesCarse. Carse explicates the relationship between churches and their congregations, withthe intent of parsing religions from belief systems. The communitas/civitas modelpresented in this paper uses principles derived from his work. A postmodern worldviewunderpins the civitas/communitas model, accounting for the role of consumption as ameans of identity formation and self-actualisation. The marketing-specific servicedominantlogic paradigm strengthens the model by pinpointing value creation. Themodel describes marketing in a Carsean fashion, as an infinite game, and then expandson the interaction of the communitas (the collective) with the civitas (the producer),using principles derived from philosophy and religion. The model delineates therelationships between producers and consumer collectives, and draws parallelsbetween consumer religiosity and spiritual religiosity. These parallels reveal a rich anddeep understanding of how to manage and leverage these relationships.

      • Women Coaches’ Experiences of Stress and Self-Regulation

        Natalie Durand-Bush,Jamie Collins,Kylie McNeill 한국코칭능력개발원 2012 International Journal of Coaching Science Vol.6 No.2

        Research exploring stress among sport coaches is scarce and although coaches experience a broad array of stressors, little is known about how they effectively cope with them (Levy, Nicholls, Marchant, & Polman, 2009). The purpose of this multiple case study was to explore eight women coaches’ experiences of stress and self-regulation and examine if self-regulation strategies helped them to manage daily demands and cope with stress. A secondary aim was to explore the coaches’ perceptions of the impact of stress and self-regulation on their well-being, burnout, and coaching effectiveness. The eight women coaches working within competitive development or high performance coaching contexts participated in an open-ended, semi-structured 90 minute interview guided by Smith’s (1986) model of stress and burnout and Zimmerman’s (2000) model of self-regulation. Results of the structured content analysis indicated that the coaches faced various internal and external demands in their coaching and personal life that led them to experience stress when these demands outweighed their internal and external resources. The coaches also reported using several types of self-regulation strategies not only to prepare to meet and manage their daily demands and expectations but also to cope with stressful situations. Six coaches discussed experiencing burnout at least once in their career and each coach reported that they could benefit from developing their self-regulation capacity to enhance their well-being and coaching effectiveness, particularly during times of stress. Implications for future research and the development of self-regulation interventions for women in coaching are discussed.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼