The Demonstrative Ku ‘He' Binding in the Dative Construction

이두원 한국중원언어학회 2010 언어학연구 Vol.0 No.16

The dative marker -eykey 'to' can be attached to the experiencer or goal in Korean. There are two kinds of eykey-marked elements or phrases: a dative experiencer and dative goal. There are big syntactic differences between the dative experiencer and the dative goal: that is, the dative experiencer can be responsible for the agreement of the subject honorification and the subject-oriented binding, but the dative goal cannot. The dative experiencer is a syntactic subject, whereas the dative goal is an indirect object. The demonstrative ku 'he' can appear as a bound variable which Principle A regulates (cf. Kang 2010). The dative goal can bind the demonstrative ku, but not the reflexive caki 'self' in the complement position of the dative construction. While the reflexive caki in the complement position triggers a binding-freezing effect of the goal, the demonstrative ku in the complement position drives the binding-thawing effect of the goal.

정치선거의 정책 찬반토론 포맷 개발 연구 : 교차조사식 논쟁(CEDA)을 중심으로

이두원 청주대학교사회과학연구소 2009 한국사회과학연구 Vol.31 No.1

Debate is a formal method of interactive and representational argument. Policy debates during a political campaign are exciting and challenging for both candidates and voters. In a campaign season debates on TV or other media offer an opportunity for citizens to see and hear the major candidates side-by-side. In a few cases, debates turn the tide of the campaign, tipping the balance towards one candidate or another. Such impact of policy debates during a political campaign is on the basis of the fact that debates provide candidates with an important opportunity to present their message unfiltered to a wide voters on media. However, regardless of the importance of debates in political campaign, the format of the pros and cons debate on policy still need to be designed to provide voters more effectively the "differences" of the candidates' viewpoints on a resolution and/or policy. The purpose of this study is to extend the argumentation principles, structure, and procedures of CEDA(Cross Examination Debate Association) to "the format of the pros and cons debate on policy" which promotes an "legitimate argument" among political candidates more relied on logic, proofs, backing data, evidences, and counterplans. 정치선거에서 미디어를 통한 후보 간의 ‘정책 찬반토론’은 유권자에게 후보의 정책성향뿐만 아니라 소통 능력을 논리적(logos), 감성적(pathos), 윤리적(ethos) 차원에서 다면적으로 평가할 수 있는 기회를 제공한다. ‘교차조사식 논쟁’은 정책 찬반토론에 매우 효율적인 논쟁 포맷(debate format)으로, 미국의 전국 대학생 디베이트 대회에서 오랫동안 기본 포맷으로 사용되면서 ‘아카데미식 논쟁’이라고 불리기도 한다. 1947년 이래 개최되어온 전미 디베이트 토너먼트의 방식에 교차조사를 추가함으로서 디베이트 참여자간 직접적인 문답 형식의 공방을 가능하도록 한 것이 교차조사식 논쟁의 특징이다. 이 연구에서는 교차조사식 논쟁(CEDA)의 기본 원리와 진행방식을 중심으로 한국의 선거방송토론에 적용(applications)할 수 있는 ‘정책 찬반토론 포맷’을 설계(design)해 보고자 하였다. 정치 선거에서 중요한 정책이나 사안에 대한 후보간 상호 배타적인 입장이 구체화 될 수 있는 ‘정책 찬반토론 포맷’을 개발·활용함으로써 유권자에게 자신의 의견과 일치도가 높은 후보를 ‘합리적’으로 선택할 수 있는 기회를 제공하고, 더나가 주장의 논거(論據)와 증거자료를 제시해가면 청중을 설득할 수 있는 ‘정치적 소통 능력’을 보유한 후보를 찾아낼 수 있는 기회를 제공하게 될 것이다.

Dative Arguments in Unaccusative and Passive Constructions

이두원 한국외국어대학교 언어연구소 2012 언어와 언어학 Vol.0 No.56

The dative arguments with thematic roles of experiencer and possessor in the so-called dyadic unaccusative predicates, which are regarded as a quasi-transitive predicate with a vP phase here, trigger an intervention effect when the nominative objects move to the subject position above the dative argument, so inducing the unacceptable sentences. When a vP functions as a phase, the VP constituent will undergo transfer to the phonological and semantic components and thereafter cease to be accessible to further syntactic operations. At this point, the nominative object within the VP cannot move to the subject position. However, the dative argument does not trigger the intervention effect in the so-called typical unaccusative construction. Also in the passive construction, the complement can undergo movement to the subject position across the dative argument. At this point, the vP is not a phase because it is unaccusative by virtue of having no thematic external argument (e.g., no agent, no experiencer). When the syntactic derivation proceeds by merging the resulting vP with T, the VP-dative argument or nominative complement can undergo movement to Spec-TP for an EPP reason; hence, no intervention effect.

Milestone for Null Pronominalization in the Ciman-Construction: A Reply to An (2013)

이두원 한국언어학회 2013 언어 Vol.38 No.3

The marker nun attached to the relevant nominal in the subsequent clause of the ciman construction is not a plain topic one, but rather a contrastive topic one (Lee 2013a). This induces its contrastive counterpart to be retrieved out of the preceding clause. If the counterpart is identified and may be syntactically independent of its following nominal, the next step is that the nun-marked remnant allows null pronominalization. Beyond the multiple case marking construction (i.e., MCM) context, this may even be extended to the non-MCM context. The nominative- or accusative-marked genuine possessor or the adjunct, which can be replaced by the genitive-marked element, acts separately from its immediately following nominal in the sentence-level context, which induces the nun-marked remnant in the second clause to allow null pronominalization. This is also what the nun-marked goal in the subsequent clause of the ciman construction allowing the double accusative construction shows. As a result, the null pronominalization of the Minor Argument (i.e., null pronominalization of sonkalak-ul 'finger-ACC' in Tom-uy sonkalak-ul 'Tom-GEN finger-ACC' which is Minor Argument Pronominalization (i.e., MAP) in An's (2012a) term) in the MCM context and the other null pronominalization in the non-MCM context are both the same null argument phenomenon even though the former is involved in the nun-marked remnant's ownership of the Minor Argument.

Negative Imperatives Revisited

이두원 한국언어학회 2014 언어 Vol.39 No.1

At PF, when the merger of the morphological features takes place in Korean, the negative imperatives are ungrammatical, if negation blocks the [imp] feature in C from merging with the verb. Short/long form Neg (hereafter, SFN/LFN) is a head of NegP between vP and TP and mal 'don't' in negative imperatives is a lexical spell-out of a combination of Neg and [Imp-Op] in C. Hence, while mal-negative imperatives are possible, short/long form negative imperatives are not. SFN is a syntactic construction, not a prefix attachment. In this vein, the SFN imperative of the morphological causative construction is ungrammatical. When negative prefixes such as pwul, pi, and mi are attached to a predicate, imperatives can be formed with the predicate because there is no functional head Neg which blocks the [Imp] feature in C from merging with the verb. These suppletive forms such as molu(-ta) 'not know' and eps(-ta) 'not exist' behave like other regular short-form syntactic negations (Chung 2007b). This is why the imperatives of suppletive negations are ungrammatical.

Multiple Case Marking and Null Argument Phenomena

이두원 한국언어학회 2012 언어 Vol.37 No.3

This paper deals critically with An's (2012) argument that the second clause (i.e. target clause) of a sentence is derived from the multiple case marking (MCM) construction via null pronominalization (i.e. pro) of the second nominative phrase with the optional introduction of a relevant discourse particle such as the topic marker -nun. This paper identifies the following by examining some empirical phenomena involved in this argument. First, though the genitive construction in the first clause allows MCM counterparts, the target clause does not always permit null pronominalization. Second, only when the genuine grammatical subject or object in the target clause is selected by its predicate, it can undergo null pronominalization. At this point, body-part or kinship expressions are a typical example which can be represented as pro. Third, the target clause may or may not be equivalent to the MCM counterpart when it involves pro. Finally, the genuine grammatical subject or object in question necessarily shows up as a null argument when the target clause involves null pronominalization, regardless of whether one or more genitive elements appear in the genitive construction in the antecedent clause.

기업의 대 (對) 지역사회 관계와 쟁점관리에 관한 연구

이두원 한국PR학회 1997 PR연구 Vol.1 No.1

N/A

Compatibility of Give and Cwuta with the Gradable Adverb : Abstract Direct Objects

이두원 忠州大學校 2007 한국교통대학교 논문집 Vol.42 No.-

While the factor of the accomplishment-denoting VP is the verbs such as ka- or o-, that of the accomplishment-denoting cwuta predicate is the abstract direct object. The dative verbs such as give and cwuta modifiable by the gradable adverb gradually or cemcem are accomplishment verbs in the sense that the adverb is compatible with events that give rise to an interpretation that involves a series of subintervals at the aspectual temporal level. In this paper, it is argued that the endpoint of the event in the dative construction is the goal.

英語의 結束理論에 關한 考察

李斗源 成均館大學校 大學院 1989 首善論集 Vol.14 No.1

再重疊

李斗院 忠州大學校 1995 한국교통대학교 논문집 Vol.30 No.1

.