http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
연구개발서비스기업의 효율성, 생산성 및 생산성변화 결정요인 분석
황경연 ( Kyung-yun Hwang ) 한국생산성학회 2018 生産性論集 Vol.32 No.4
This study assessed the efficiency and productivity of R&D service firms using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Sequential Malmquist Productivity Index (SMPI), while analyzing the factors that affect the productivity change of R&D service firms using the panel regression model. This study selected labor, capital, tangible assets and total assets as input variables, whereas, sales and operating profit where used as output variables for DEA and SMPI. Also, in this research, intangible assets, industrial property rights, capital adequacy ratio, in-addition to selling and administrative expenses were considered as factors influencing the productivity change of R&D service firms, based on existing empirical studies. In the empirical analysis, data on 66 R&D service firms from the last three years (2015 to 2017) were used. Results showed that CCR efficiency was 0.529, 0.474, and, 0.481, in 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively, while BCC efficiency, in R&D service firms, was 0.599, 0.551 and 0.548 in 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Even though, productivity, technology and scale efficiency increased by 6.0%, 15.4% and 2.1%, respectively, technical efficiency and pure technical efficiency decreased by 8.1%, and 10.1%, respectively in the same period. Panel regression analysis showed that intangible assets and industrial property rights had a positive effect on productivity change, while capital adequacy ratio, and selling and administrative expenses had a negative effect on productivity change. Finally, industrial property rights had a positive impact on efficiency change, whereas, capital adequacy ratio had a negative impact on efficiency change. Also, intangible assets, and selling and administrative expenses had no significant effect on efficiency change in R&D service firms. The results of this study will contribute to improve the efficiency and productivity of R&D service firms in practice. In addition, this study provides policy implications for the government to grow R&D service firms.
기업의 자원과 성과간의 관계에서 제품 및 공정혁신능력과 기술사업화역량의 역할 분석
황경연(Kyung-Yun Hwang),성을현(Eul-Hyun Sung) 한국기술혁신학회 2016 기술혁신학회지 Vol.19 No.1
본 연구는 기업의 보유 자원과 성과간의 관계에서 제품 및 공정혁신능력과 기술사업화역량의 역할을 분석하는데 목적을 두고 있다. 본 연구는 이를 위해 자원준거관점과 혁신 및 기술사업화 관련 실증연구에 기초하여 연구모형을 설정하고, 설문조사를 통해 수집된 대덕연구개발특구내 109개 기업 자료를 활용하여 검정하였다. PLS-SEM을 활용한 실증분석에서 기업의 인적 자원과 무형 자원은 제품혁신 능력과 공정혁신능력에 유의적인 정의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나 기업의 유형자원은 제품혁신 능력과 공정혁신능력에 유의적인 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 기업의 제품혁신능력과 공정혁신능력은 기술사업화역량에 유의적인 정의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나 기업성과에는 직접적으로 유의적인 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났고, 기업의 기술사업화역량은 기업성과에 유의적인 정의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 혁신능력을 제품혁신능력과 공정혁신능력으로 구분하고, 이러한 혁신능력이 기술사업화역량에 미치는 영향을 분석했다는 점에서 차별화된 연구이다. This study assesses the structure relationships between resource, product and process innovation capability, technology commercialization competence and performance of firms in Daedeok Innopolis. In particular, this study attempts to analyze technology commercialization competence that may be influenced by product and process capabilities. The development of the research model is based on the literature of resource-based view and the empirical studies of technology commercialization competence. The survey of 109 firms was conducted from January 5, 2015 through February 4, 2015. We investigate the role of a firm’s technology commercialization competence in determining its performance by performing Partial Least Squares analysis. The results indicate that a firm’s human resources and intangible resources lead to a higher level of its product and process innovation capabilities. This study, however, finds that a firm’s tangible resources do not have significant effects on its product and process innovation capabilities. And the study finds evidence that firm’s product and process capabilities have positive effects on its technology commercialization competence. The study also finds that a firm’s technology commercialization competence is a driving force behind its performance, showing that its technology commercialization competence positively involves its performance. In addition the study finds that technology commercialization competence mediates the relationship between a firm’s innovation capability and performance, indicating that the technology commercialization used as mediating variable positively affects its innovation performance.
공공연구기관의 연구자 특성 및 협력시스템 적합성이 관계의 질 및 협력성공가능성에 미치는 영향 : 산연협력을 중심으로
황경연(Kyung-Yun Hwang) 한국무역연구원 2021 무역연구 Vol.17 No.6
Purpose This study aims to analyze the net effect and interaction effect of researcher characteristics, cooperation system suitability, and relationship quality on the success possibility of I-PRIs cooperation in Industry-Public Research Institutes (I-PRIs) cooperation. Design/Methodology/Approach Based on the existing literature, we explored researcher characteristics that are expected to affect the success possibility of I-PRIs cooperation. A relationship that affects the success possibility of I-PRIs cooperation by combining researcher characteristics, cooperation system suitability, and relationship quality was established as a conceptual research model. To analyze this, we conducted a survey targeting researchers with experience in I-PRIs cooperation in Daedeok Innopolis. PLS and fsQCA were used for data analysis. Findings From the results of PLS analysis, we found that technology commercialization capability and relationship quality enhance the success possibility of I-PRIs cooperation. In the fsQCA results, Solution 1 showed that the success possibility of I-PRIs cooperation was high if high technology commercialization orientation, high innovation orientation, and high relationship quality exist. Solution 2 showed that the success possibility of I-PRIs cooperation was high if high technology commercialization capability, high technology commercialization orientation, high cooperation system suitability, and high relationship quality exist. Research Implications This study contributed academically in that it revealed the relationship that influenced the success possibility of I-PRIs cooperation by combining researcher characteristics, cooperation system suitability, and relationship quality.