우 Valsalva동에서 기시한 좌주관상동맥 기형과 합병된 동맥관개존증 1예

주형준 ( Hyung Joon Joo ),홍순준 ( Soon Jun Hong ),김진석 ( Jin Seok Kim ),박희남 ( Hui Nam Pak ),심완주 ( Wan Joo Shim ),신승용 ( Seung Yong Shin ),임도선 ( Do Sun Lim ) 대한내과학회 2008 대한내과학회지 Vol.74 No.2

선천성 관상동맥기형은 관상동맥조형술을 시행한 환자에서 약 0.5%로 발견되는 드문 질환이다. 하지만 주변구조물 및 주행경로에 따라 무증상에서 급사 및 심근 허혈등 다양한 임상경과를 나타낼 수 있다. 저자들은 이전에 동맥관개 존증으로 수술한 환자로 흉통을 호소하여 시행한 관상동맥 조형술에서 좌주관상동맥이 대동맥의 우 Valsalva동에서 우 관상동맥과 함께 기시하여, 정상보다 훨씬 긴 주행을 보이는 특이한 경우를 발견하여 보고하는 바이다. The finding of a left main coronary artery arising from the right sinus of Valsalva is a rare congenital anomaly. The clinical course of patients with a congenital anomaly of the coronary artery may be compromised depending on its anatomic relationship with adjunctive structures. Some anomalous origins of the left main coronary arteries arising from right aortic sinus of Valsalva have been associated with angina pectoris and sudden death, especially if their pathways are between the pulmonary artery and the aorta. We report a rare case with a combined congenital anomalous origin of the left main coronary artery arising with the right coronary artery simultaneously from the right aortic sinus of Valsalva in a patient with a patent ductus arteriosus. The left main coronary artery was extremely long because its pathway went in front of the pulmonary artery. There was no evidence of artherosclerosis or dynamic stenosis on the angiogram. (Korean J Med 74:188-191, 2008)

대형할인매장의 서비스 품질 측정 지표 연구

주형준 ( Hyung Joon Joo ),조재립 ( Jai Rip Cho ) 한국품질경영학회 2009 한국품질경영학회 학술대회 Vol.2009 No.2

1930년대 초 남경정부의 금본위제 도입 시도와 그 의미

朱螢俊(Joo, Hyung-Joon) 동양사학회 2021 東洋史學硏究 Vol.155 No.-

This paper is a study on the attempts to introduce the gold standard system during the Nanjing Government. From February 1, 1930 to August 19, 1948, the Nanjing Government implemented a system to collect tariffs in gold units. And through this, it was possible to keep the tax revenue relatively stable during the period when the monetary value was unstable. In the previous study, the influence of the Kemmerer Committee was posited by paying attention to the commonalities between “孫” and “海關金單位” in the monetary reform proposal submitted by the Committee. However, the tendency to approach it from a financial perspective was remarkable, and no concrete analysis was conducted on the nature of currency reform. In 1928, the Nanjing Government set the introduction of the gold standard as the final stage of monetary reform, and decided to implement “廢兩改元” as a preparatory stage. The reform policy decided at the 1928 Conference, despite differences in scope and degree, yielded a certain degree of achievement. However, in matters related to monetary reform, it is recognized that “廢兩改元” could not be initiated until 1933, when certain external conditions were established, while it was not implemented due to an unstable government. However, in the context of the collapse of the international gold block, “廢兩改元” could not be a preparatory stage for the introduction of the gold standard determined in 1928. Previous studies only mentioned that this could not be carried out in the aftermath of the Great Economic Depression, but there was no specific analysis on the issue of the introduction of the gold standard. This paper attempted to analyze this issue in reviewing the establishment and activities of the Kemmerer Committee. The monetary reform policy decided at the 1928 Conference led to a contact with Edwin Walter Kemmerer, a global gold standard money reform expert, in August 1928. The Kemmerer Committee, formed in February 1929, submitted proposals for monetary reform, “Project of Law for the Gradual Introduction of a Gold Standard Currency System in China together with a Report in Support thereof” and “Report on Project of Law for Placing Customs Duties on Imports rom abroad upon a Gold Basis”. This paper analyzed the topical reform of the gold standard through these reform proposals that were not noticed in previous studies. This analysis can explain the process of the Nanjing government"s monetary reform, which has not been clearly explained from the 1928 Conference to the 1933 “廢兩改元”. And through this, it will contribute to reviewing the policy continuity of the Nanjing government"s currency reform history.

청말(清末) 금융위기(金融危機)와 해관은호(海關銀號)의 도산(倒産) -천진(天津)의 진해관(津海關)을 중심으로-

朱螢俊 ( Joo¸ Hyung Joon ) 중국사학회 2022 中國史硏究 Vol.- No.136

This study analyzed the process that the financial market crisis in the late Qing Dynasty threatened the stability of customs administration through the Jin Haiguan (津海關, a customs office) in Tianjin, China. The proxy tax collection structure of customs in the Qing Dynasty was a device to manage the costs and risks produced in the procedure of administration by the tax collection authorities. The tax collection contractors were guaranteed the right to operate customs duties in return for participating in the tax collection business. After the disintegration of the Canton system, the Qing Dynasty installed Customs banks, superseding the Hong merchants who were in charge of the tax collection contracting business during the early period. The tax collection was delegated to operators selected by the Superintendents. The late tax collection contracting business was led by Qianzhuang and Yin hao (錢莊, 銀號, traditional Chinese banking institutions), which were engaged in the conventional financial industry. As the Customs banks profited from loans and receipts based on the right to operate tax revenue, the financial market conditions significantly affected their profitability. The two financial crises in Tianjin in the 1900s distinctly implicated the adverse imp act of market changes on the stability of the Customs banks’ ta x collection structure. The first was damage to the Customs banks due to the deterioration of currency quality. As a result of the tax collection contractors taking on the risk of customs administration, the Qing Dynasty maintained stable tax revenue, while the profitability of the Customs banks was inevitably degraded. The second was the prospect of bankruptcy as the financial environment was aggravated. The Customs banks’ stability and profitability through managing considerable quantities of tax revenue through financial activities were destined to suffer a severe blow when market liquidity was restricted. The first crisis succeeded in early settlement through the active intervention of the Qing Dynasty. The local authorities normalized the currency quality, and the market immediately stabilized. However, the second crisis rendered the Qing dynasty unable to address due to the aftermath of the revolution, precipitating the collapse of the financial market in Tianjin. According to the nature of the financial market in the late Qing Dynasty based on the credit economy, the bankruptcies of financial institutions generated a chain reaction, and financial institutions that had direct or indirect claim-obligation relationship with a Customs bank A in Tianjin started to fail as well. Nonetheless, in the second crisis, the Qing Dynasty did not protect the Customs banks but instead reclaimed Liu Feng bank’s right to operate the Customs banks and transferred it to HSBC. Although the local government showed an active move to support the Customs banks in the unstable market situation, it was to thoroughly ensure the stability of the tax revenue administration. Under the circumstances where the possibility of A’s bankruptcy increased, the tax collection authority decided to replace the tax collection contractors rather than bear the risk. It was a typical coping mechanism of the bureaucracy, which prioritized the stability of customs administration.