http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
韓國의 法律救助制度에 관한 硏究 : 日本의 法律扶助制度와의 比較法的 考察 The Comparative Approach to the Japanese System
鄭在吉 전북대학교 법학연구소 1991 法學硏究 Vol.18 No.-
The Legal Aid Cooperation in Korea has established on September 1987. The Legal Aid Cooperation, as a sole and national organization in Korean initiated the system of advance payment of trial cost for the poor. The Legal Aid Association from Japan was prior to the Legal Aid Cooperation . The Role and Function of two organization is same. But in Japan the Legal Aid Law yet don't establish. The Comparative study on the Legal Aid System between Korea and Japan was written because our system, came from Japan. The citizens have the right of the approach to Justice. But actually the poor can't approach to Justice because they have no money and not enough to knowlege about legal system. Government has the duty to aid the poor in the court with the methods the legal service policy. The contents of this dissertation are followings: Chapter Ⅰ. Introduction Chapter Ⅱ. THe legal aid system in Japan 1. History (1) Pre-1945 (2) 1945_the establishment of the Association (3) Development of the Legal Aid Association 2. Organization of the Legal Aid Association 3. Activities of the Legal Aid Association (1) Legal aid activity (2) Free legal advice Service (3) Other service by the Association 4. Finances of the Legal Aid Association (1) Budgeting of funds (2) Necessary amount to undertake activities 5. Activities of the Legal Aid Association in 1989. (1) General Part (2) Special Part 6. Legislation of the Legal Aid Law (1) Legislation on the establishment of the Association (2) Legislation on 1980s Chapter Ⅲ. The legal aid system in Korea 1. The establishment of the Legal Aid Cooperation 2. Organization of the Legal Aid Cooperation 3. Objects and Process of Legal aid 4. Activities of the Legal Aid Cooperation in 1989. 5. Direction of amendment about the Legal Aid Law Chapter Ⅳ. Several suggestions for the improvement of legal aid system 1. Priority of the policy of judicial welfare and enlargement of budget 2. Variety of subjects in free legal service 3. Choice to the principle of the pre=location of first free legal service Chapter Ⅴ. Conclusion