RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        2000년 이후 한국의 5·4신문화운동 연구 동향과 향후 과제

        임상범 ( Lim Sangbum ) 한국중국학회 2017 중국학보 Vol.81 No.-

        `5·4신문화운동`은 20세기 중국을 이해하는데 필수적인 사건이자, Xijinping 시대의 중국이 자신의 미래를 둘러싸고 벌이는 논의에서 다루어지는 핵심적인 화두의 하나이다. 5·4신문화운동은 한국에서 많은 연구 성과를 거두었지만, 아직까지 한 권의 연구서도 출간되지 않았다. 본고는 2000년대에 이루어진 한국의 연구 성과를 정리했다. 1990년대에 제시된 관점과 방법론을 계승한 21세기의 연구들은 5·4운동의 민족주의적 성격과 근대화론을 결합하면서 정치적·사회적 성격의 애국운동보다 문화적·사상적 측면이 강조된 문화운동이나 계몽운동을 강조했다. 2장에서는 `민주`가 현재 중국의 과제와 관련해서 다루어졌고, `인간해방`의 문제는 여성문제와 새로운 미시사적 접근법이 주목을 받았음을 지적했다. 3장에서는 신문화운동가 이외 집단들의 국민국가 건설론, 국민국가 건설의 핵심적 요소로서 `국어`의 형성과 에스페란토어에 대한 관심을 다루었다. 또한 지역과 국제주의적 연대 문제도 연구 대상이 되었다. 4장은 진화론과 글쓰기 문제를 중심으로 한 이데올로기의 제약을 뛰어넘는 문학혁명론이 다루어졌다. 5장은 전통과 근대의 관계를 중심으로 한 `근대화론`에 대해 신문화운동가뿐만 아니라 보수주의자와 기독교 세력의 주장까지 연구 범위를 넓혔다. The May Fourth Movement is an important event that, understanding of which is required for studying 20th century China. Further, this topic is a major one in discussion on the future of Xijinping-era China. While researches on May Fourth Movement yielded many success in South Korea, there has been no published book on the subject matter. This article categorized the accomplishments that occurred in 2000s South Korea on this subject. The researches in the 21st century, while inheriting the methodologies and perspectives from the trends of the 90s, emphasize political, social aspects of the culture and the enlightenment movement by merging the nationalist characteristics and theories of modernity. In the chapter 2, on one hand democracy is examined with the current state of China in mind, on the other hand human liberation is examined in the eyes of women`s rights movement and latest micro-historic approaches. The chapter 3 takes a look at formation of a nation state theorized by groups other than New Culture revolutionists, and the formation of `national language` as a major element in building a nation state. Interests in Esperanto spiked during this period. Also, international collaboration of this era is examined. In the chapter 4, the theory on cultural revolution is proposed as a means to transcend ideological limits caused by evolution and the issues of critical writing. Finally in the chapter 5, as to the respect of the theories of modernization that center on the relationship between traditions and modernity, the article expands the research onto conservatives and Christian perspectives, not just on those of New Culture revolutionists.

      • KCI등재

        ‘통식교육’을 통한 문명대국 중국 만들기

        임상범 ( Lim Sangbum ) 대구사학회 2016 대구사학 Vol.124 No.-

        본고는 현재 중국에서 추진하고 있는 일련의 대학교육개혁 가운데에 ‘통식교육(general education)’에 주목하였다. 중국은 최근 공공교육의 균형 발전, 산학협력, 창의인재 배양 능력 제고, 학습형 사회 건설, 세계 일류대학 건설 등을 그 내용으로 한 대학교육의 개혁안을 추진하고 있다. 이러한 ‘十三五’ 규획의 고등교육개혁 방안은 우리나라의 대학교육 개혁안과 상당히 흡사하다. 그러나 필자는 한국의 개혁안에 없는 하나의 중요한 화두가 중국의 개혁 방안에 있다고 생각한다. 그것은 시진핑 체제에서 본격적으로 내세우고 있는 ‘중국몽’과 ‘문명의 건설’과 관련된다. 중국정부는 최근 대학 당국들에게 중국이 주도하는 세계를 이끌 새로운 중국적이면서도 세계적인 인문적 가치 혹은 이론을 정립할 것을 요구하고 있다. 중국 지도층은 그러한 인문학적 가치 혹은 이론이 새로운 시대정신이 되고, 그 정신의 영향 아래에서 사회과학ㆍ자연과학ㆍ응용과학 등 각종 학문이 새로운 발전 방향을 제시하면, 중국이 전세계의 문명을 새로운 방향으로 이끌어갈 수 있다고 생각하고 있다. 이때 중국에서는 ‘통식교육’을 바탕으로 한 세계일류대학 양성이 ‘문명’ 건설의 핵심을 담당할 고등교육개혁의 핵심 방안의 하나로 부각되었다. 통식교육론자들은 ‘통식교육’의 핵심적인 목표로 중국문화의 주체성 의식을 수립하며 중국문명의 맥락인 ‘군자’를 양성하는 것이며, 그것을 실현하기 위한 중국적 방법의 하나로 ‘기숙형 서원’을 제시하고 있다. 그들의 이러한 노력은 최근 중국에서 강력히 제시하고 있는 ‘중국모델’을 교육에 적용하는 것처럼 보여 흥미롭다. This article focuses on ``general education,`` which is one of many college education reform methods currently promoted in China. China``s 13th Five-Year planning includes a plan to reform higher education, which is quite similar to the reform of college education in Republic of Korea, except that the Chinese plan has one important discourse lacking in the Korean plan. This discourse is closely related to ``China Dream`` and Civilization construction which are promoted by the Xi Jinping system. The Chinese government is demanding a formation of humanistic theory or value system that is not only Chinese in nature but also can be applied worldwide. The social leaders in China think that, if such humanistic value system settles down as the new zeitgeist, China will be able to lead the civilizations all over the world in a new direction. A specific method for this is the aforementioned ``general education,`` which aims to install identity of the Chinese culture within society and train modern Confucian "gentlemen" who are traditional backbones of Chinese civilization. The plan proposes ``dormitory-style academies 書院`` as a Chinese way to realize its goals. These attempts are interesting because it appears that the government is attempting to apply the recently promoted ``Chinese model`` to its education system. (Sungshin University / limsb1919@gmail.com)

      • KCI등재

        민두기 사학의 일면

        임상범(Lim Sangbum) 동양사학회 2009 東洋史學硏究 Vol.107 No.-

        Research of late professor Mintuki represents where the Chinese Historian community in South Korea stands now. Mintugi's unique perspective was for a long time considered as the only possible way of studying Chinese History in South Korea. As perusing his life-long work of criticism on Chinese History which is seldom mentioned in current Korean intellectual community, I recognized the needs of seeing his researches in the context of Korean intellectual history, and the possibilities of applying the discourse of Chinese history to such a process. In order for this, I looked at the formation and advance of Mintukian History in the context of South Korean modern history, so as to understand the structure of his discourse of Chinese History. Mintuki lived through the latter half of the 20th century when Republic of Korea was founded and competed with North Korea to boast its superiority. Of course, he had compassion for humanity when he chose History as his profession, and his compassion surfaced as an interest in life of peoples. At the same time, he was liberal in a rather traditional sense, focusing on objective and positive methodologies. Nevertheless, in contemporary society where globalization is forced onto people, I think we need to view History from a different perspective than his. That is, to see how an abstract idea of a modern nation materialized in local everyday communities, and to see how marginalized communities and their constituents reacted to the external force -- what the modern nation meant to individuals who had to be liberated and respected. This repositioning of perspectives is to be done in the view of resistance and diversity.

      • KCI등재

        사학부(史學部) : 대국굴기의 미래, 제국 중국?

        임상범 ( Sangbum Lim ) 한국중국학회 2015 중국학보 Vol.71 No.-

        The question about the future of China has a serious meaning in contemporary South Korea, because it is suspected that the achievement-oriented South Korean society will praise the exceptionality of Chinese Model and that the new ``Universal Values`` of China may interfere with the way of South Koreans`` lives. Therefore, the author thinks that even if China does not become the only global superpower, the frightening regional-power characteristics of ``Imperial China`` could be a threat to South Koreans`` lives. The author recognizes the necessity to put the contemporary China into perspective with the keyword ``empire,`` and to do this, the author looks into how the objective of the Chinese government and its intellectuals has progressed from ``Peaceful Rise`` to ``the Rise of the Great Powers`` and then to ``Chinese Dream.`` The author sees this progress as part of making ``Imperial China.`` The author focuses on the feelings and thoughts of the Chinese people themselves on the concept of an empire. More specifically, the author correlates ``Chinese Dream,`` the ideology promulgated by Xi Jinping, and the keyword ``empire,`` which some scholars are bringing up, to examine the contemporary Chinese reality.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        당대 중국 문화의 상품화와 ‘80허우’

        林相範(Lim Sangbum) 중국근현대사학회 2014 중국근현대사연구 Vol.62 No.-

        China has finally realized its ‘peaceful rise.’ Now, rather than just a rise to one of many great powers, China wants to become an empire, and that means China wants to build a cultural soft power as well. Here, I intend to look at the correlation between ongoing commercialization of culture in China and ‘Balinghou’, the group that will lead the nation in its near future. In the era of commercialization that accompanied neoliberalizaton, the ‘Balinghou’ share a certain social experience in the commercialization of culture. Xiao Shenyang, an Er-ren Zhuan actor, represents the ‘Balinghou’ experience. With help from his mentor Zhao Benshan, he created a TV show for CCTV, ‘Chunwan’, which depicts everyday life of the mass in a medium of culutural and yet commercial product. Also, a TV Producer Zhao Baogang depicted the life and emotions of ‘Balinghou’ in the ‘Fendou’. However, he is criticized that his depiction focuses on few-and-far-between well off, middle class ‘Balinghou’ people rather than on sober reality that most ‘Balinghou’ people face. Han Han started as a fiction writer crtically praised for writing stories that depict real lives of the ‘Balinghou’. Later, he emerged as a public intellectual by being a cyber pundit. However, even his emergence is sometimes criticized as a commercialization of cultural criticism, to meet the market"s demand in it. Currently, nothing in China can avoid consideration of commercialization, but that does not mean there is any accompanied progress of either modern individiualism or modern liberty. This phenomenon is a result of mixture between the traditional Chinese society and spread of socialism within. And such a phenomenon is, de facto, the Chinese socialism.

      • KCI등재

        20세기 후반기 한국에서의 5ㆍ4운동 연구사

        林相範(Lim Sangbum) 중국근현대사학회 2014 중국근현대사연구 Vol.64 No.-

        This article organizes various researches on May Fourth Movement done in South Korea in th 20th century, and prepares for publishing the research on May Fourth Movement. Until early 1980s, South Korea could not achieve innovative research accomplishments because of the anti-Communist ideology, the Positivist research approaches, and the lack of primary sources. By the mid-1980s, up and rising researchers began working on research subjects and methodologies according to the needs of the Korean society, and research with purely academic purposes and revolutionary perspectives proceeded. As a result, in the mid-1990s, based on the achievement of the previous researches, independent researches were conducted; these researches were introduction of a multitude of new ideologies, and improved research subjects on Literature Revolution, the formation of a nation state, reflection on Modernity, and concern on writings. The next article on May Fourth Movement done in the 21st century’s fields of modern Chinese history and modern Chinese literature will examine how the aforementioned researches advanced so far and ponder on how the research perspectives and content should be based on our lives.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼