http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
최근 치과용 지르코니아 CAD/CAM 수복물의 임상적 고찰
이해형(Lee Hae-Hyoung) 대한치과의사협회 2011 대한치과의사협회지 Vol.49 No.5
Currently there is no dental ceramic material can be used in all dental situations need to be restored. However, in view of recent clinical reports, the most viable alternative is zirconia ceramic. Clinical success of dental zirconia restorations strongly depends on proper selection of materials, accurate laboratory procedure and final cementation, which can be achievable with the correct understanding of zirconia. As dental materials, zirconia ceramics have a very bright future, because they are being used increasingly in the anterior region as implant fixtures, as well a s crown and bridge restorations and implant abutments. Many dental ceramics showing poor clinical performance have been gone from the dental market. However in terms of outstanding mechanical properties and esthetic nature, new dental materials can replace zirconia ceramics will not be available in the foreseeable future.
IPS Empress 도재관의 파절강도 : 하악 제2소구치에서 교합면 두께와 축면 경사도에 따른 영향
김희진,이해형,남영성,동진근,Kim Hee-Jin,Lee Hae-Hyoung,Nam Young-Sung,Dong Jin-Keun 대한치과보철학회 2002 대한치과보철학회지 Vol.40 No.5
The purpose of this study was compare the fracture strength of the IPS Empress ceramic crown according to the occlusal depth (1.5mm, 2.0mm, 2.5mm) and axial inclination ($4^{\circ},\;8^{\circ},\;12^{\circ}$) of the lower second premolar. After 10 metal dies were made for each group, the IPS Empress ceramic crowns were fabricated and cemented with resin cement. The cemented crowns were mounted on the testing jig with inclination of 30 degrees and the universal testing machine was used to measure the fracture strength. The results of this study were as follows : 1. The fracture strength of the ceramic crown with 2.5mm depth and $12^{\circ}$ inclination was the highest (1284 N). Crowns of 1.5mm depth and $8^{\circ}$ inclination had the lowest strength (951 N). 2. There were no significant differences in the fracture strength by axial inclination of the same occlusal depth group. 3. Most fracture lines began at the loading area and extended through proximal surface perpendicular to the margin, irrespective of occlusal depth.
지르코니아-전장도재 계면의 전단결합강도에 대한 ZirLiner<sup>®</sup> 적용과 분사처리의 영향에 관한 연구
신영호,이유나,이해형,동진근,오상천,Shin, Young-Ho,Lee, Yu-Na,Lee, Hae-Hyoung,Dong, Jin-Keun,Oh, Sang-Chun 대한턱관절교합학회 2008 구강회복응용과학지 Vol.24 No.1
이 연구의 목적은 지르코니아 도재 표면의 전단 결합 강도에서 $ZirLiner^{(R)}$와 블라스팅 처리의 적용 효과를 평가하기 위한 것이다. 60개의 무색의 지르코니아 판과 30개의 색이 있는 지르코니아 판이 규격화되고 연마, 글래스블라스팅, 알루미나블라스팅, 그리고 zirliner 같은 블라스팅 처리를 적용시키는 것에 따라 10개씩 9개의 그룹으로 나누어졌다. 시편을 고정대에 위치하고 만능시험기로 전단력을 측정하였다. 파절된 견본의 파절 표면은 SEM으로 검사되었다. 각 군별 시편을 통계처리하여 그 결과를 비교하였다. The purpose of this study was to evaluate effect of application of $ZirLiner^{(R)}$ and blasting treatments on shear bond strength of zirconia-veneered porcelain interface. 60 uncolored zirconia plates and 30 colored zirconia plates were fabricated and divided into nine groups of 10 according to blasting treatment such as as-ground, glass blasting and alumina blasting and zirliner application. Veneering porcelains were built up over the center of the treated zirconia ceramic surface using jig and fired according to the manufacturers' instructions. Each specimen was completely embedded in acrylic resin. The specimens were placed in a mounting jig and subjected to shear force by a universal testing machine. Load was applied at a crosshead speed of 0.5㎜/min until failure. Average shear strengths were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance and one-way analysis of variance and the Duncan's post-hoc test. The fracture surfaces of the failed specimens were examined by SEM. The obtained results were as follows: 1. Depending on surface treatment by blasting, the degree of roughness is revealed in the order of Glass-blasted, As-ground, and Alumnia-blasted. The roughness average of uncolored and colored zirconia ceramic were not significantly different from blasting treatments. 2. In uncolored zirconia ceramic, the shear bond strength were not significantly different from blasting treatments. However, the shear bond strength were significantly different from Zirliner application. 3. Used ZirLiner, mean shear bond strength of colored zirconia was lower than uncolored zirconia. Especially, mean shear bond strength of colored zirconia was quite low with alumina-blasting treatment. 4. SEM analysis showed that veneered porcelain failed in zirconia ceramic interface and there was no cohesive failure.