http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
오늘 본 자료
-
역사문화학회 소식(2016.6.1.~2016.12.31.) 외
-
Monitoring the Dissemination of an Educational Protocol on Pediatric Asthma in Family Practice: A Test of Associations Between Dissemination Variables
-
중수소 기반 전자소재산업 연구 동향
-
Failure Mode Characterization of Composite Materials for Weight Reduction of Railway Vehicles
-
잔여지 수용 결정요인에 관한 연구
-
기계학습을 이용한 고분자 복합수지의 물성 예측 정확도 향상을 위한 연구
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 이나가 시게미(Inaga Shigemi) (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
이나가 시게미(Inaga Shigemi),이미림(번역자) 한국미술연구소 2004 美術史論壇 Vol.- No.18
How did Westerners conceive and fancy Japanese art and its history? And, how did the Japanese react to Western representations of Japanese art? These are the questions to which this paper tries to provide some answers by framing an analysis in an historical perspective. The pioneering investigations into Japanese art and its history began in the second half of the nineteenth century. In the first phase of Western attempts at interpreting Japanese art the Japonisant-Impressionistic view was predominant (1880-1900). While many French Japonisant critics praised Hokusai as standing on the highest peak of Japanese art history, main stream Anglo-Saxon connoisseurs refused to agree with the French and put more emphasis on ink painters like Sesshu, as the incarnation of Japanese Quatrocento. This was faithful to the Anglo-American predilection to the Italian Renaissance. From the fm de siecle, the decorative aspects of Japanese art came into the Westem focus in the vogue of Art nouveau, but these impressionistic or/and decorative interpretations were rejected by Japanes authorities which consciously emphasized classical aspects of Japanese Art, The first official version of Japanese art history, L' Histoire de I' art du Japon was published first in French translation at the occasion of the Parisian World Fair in 1900. In this book, as well as in the accompanying exhibition, the Buddhist antiquities were conspicuously put to the fore so as to convince Western observers of the presence of the heretofore unrevealed treasures of Oriental art as specimens which could stand in rivalry with Greco-Roman masterpieces. While the Japanese tried to boast of their millenarian aesthetic tradition, the japonisrne fever faded out rapidly in the Occident. At the turn of the twentieth century, European taste took a keener interest in the Expressionistic and mystical aspects of Orienal art. This tendency and preference for medieval Zen Buddhism, which was mainly concocted in the Gem1aI1 speaking world, is still dominant today. In the 1920s, under a cosmopolitan climate, many Western intellectuals (like Romain Roland or Herman Hesse) experienced an "awakening" to the Orient, which included China and India, and attempts were made to establish A History of World Art in which the Orient was supposed to occupy an equal position (Henri Focillon or Rene Grousset). Almost simultaneously, some Asian scholars remarked on the similarities between Expressionist art theory and Oriental tradition, which resulted in the nationalistic reaction that can be characterized as the "return to the Orient" by the Asiatics in the 1930s. When Spengler s "Decline of the West" appears, it served as a rallying cry for Asia -centnc ideologies that sought to formulate their own "Oriental aesthetics" as an antithesis to Westem aesthetics (feng Zikai, Kinbara Shogo etc} By chronologically tracing these transitions in Western aesthetic appreciations of Japanese art and the Oriental reactions to them, the paper tries to critically clarity the cultural as well as the political background which brought about controversies and vicissitudes in value judgments on things Oriental.
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
