RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI우수등재
      • SCOPUSKCI등재
      • KCI등재

        정책인식프레이밍 관점에서 새만금 사례와 동강댐 사례의 갈등 비교연구

        안혜원(Hye-Won Ahn),박대운(Dae-Woon Park),김학돈(Hak-Don Kim) 한국콘텐츠학회 2009 한국콘텐츠학회논문지 Vol.9 No.3

        오늘날 사회적 다양성이 높아짐에 따라 정책결정을 둘러싼 정부간, 사회집단 간 갈등 역시 증가하고 있으며, 이러한 갈등은 사회발전을 저해하는 요소일 뿐만 아니라 이를 해결하는 과정에서 발생하는 사회적 비용이 매우 크다는 점에서 문제를 발생하고 있다. 따라서 사회적 갈등을 최소화하고 합리적인 의사결정을 도출해낼 수 있는 어떤 의사결정 조정기제가 필요하다고 할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 새만금 간척사업 사례와 영월댐 사례의 비교를 통하여 갈등의 원인과 관련하여 각 이해당사자들의 별도 인식 프레이밍이 상호 어떻게 형성, 대립되고 조정되는지, 그리고 이 과정이 어떻게 갈등에 영향을 미치는지 알아보고자 한다. As social diversity is increased recently, conflict between government and non-government organizations is also being increased. This conflict disturbs social development and also social cost to solve the conflict is very high. Therefore, it is necessary to set up a mediation organization which can draw reasonable decision making while minimizing social conflict. In this study, we compares Samangeum reclamation project and Youngweol dam case to find out how their recognition framings are formed, confronted, or adjusted and also how the process affects their conflict.

      • 政策硏究의 意義와 課題

        朴大雲 건국대학교 1978 論文集 Vol.8 No.1

        This thesis is concerned with political, economic and social factors which policy studies comes to the front today and considers various theories about policy studies. Public policies have made the issue with the following : 1) necessity of an advanced special knowledge according to the pluralism of modern society and the diversification of social and economic systems. 2) crucial demand of a synthesis about special knowledges in accordance with their extension. 3) development of decision-making theory in the field of social sciences and their application to the public sector. Public studies was not a matter of concern untill H. Lasswell named one of his own papers 'policy sciences'. Policy sciences in the initial stage did not get its achievement because behavioral science which policy sciences was dependent upon did not examine closely the relation between institution and enviornment and the interrelation among institutions. PPBS and public economics are concerned with public studies but the former does not confirm the positive analysis sociologically and politically, the latter is limited with the study of separate subjects. Both are lacking in the recognition how the factors of political system are connected with the qualitive and quantitative of public policy as an output. Traditional political process theory does not deal with the substance and value of public policy although it examines the political function of social groups through political dynamics of reciprocal conflict and negotiation among the groups. The factors that determine the content and effect of public policy are not always political variables composing of political system, but various social, economic and cultural variables outside the political system al·e related with them. In this sense policy analysis demands an interdisciplinary of sciences. It is important in policy studies to make it clear how these various variables are acknowledged in politics and treated through political process. So it is necessary to review the significance of political process on the side of public policy studies.

      • 行政學의 科學性과 價値問題에 관한 考察

        朴大雲 건국대학교 1977 論文集 Vol.6 No.1

        This thesis studies the value problem and crisis of identity in public administration of which the claim to independence is criticized by other disciplines, especially, political science. Although the value problem and the scope of public administration are intimately associated, premises make them logically seperate. Public administration could bring value controversies to a settlement only through scientific methodology with respect to value judgements which any social science confronts with. The inquiry into essential character of public administrative phenomenon may identify public administration as a general academic discipline so long as it is divided from political and management phenomenon. What is the definition of public administration? What is the nature of it9 subject matter? Public administrative action as a social behaviour is a cooperative human action designed to maximize the realization of goals. "Public" nature of administration, however, faces with the problem of clarifying how public administrative action can be differentiated from political and management action. Goals of public administration deduce "public" nature which is deductive from the concept of public interest. In this context the definition of public administration is "the process of policy-making and policy-executing to formulate and realize goals of public interest."

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼