http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
두용균,Du, Yong-Gyun (사)한국포장협회 2011 包裝界 Vol.221 No.-
본 원고는 한국화학물질관리협회가 지난 3월 실시한 "2011 유독물관리자 과정 교육 과정"중 발췌한 자료이다.
두용균 한국공업화학회 2015 한국공업화학회 연구논문 초록집 Vol.2015 No.1
2015년 1월 1일 시행된 화학물질 등록 및 평가 등에 관한 법률(이하 화평법)에 따라 기존과 달라진 화학물질의 평가와 유해화학물질지정체계가 시행이 되었다. 화학물질평가의 목적은 화학물질이 가지는 여러 가지 유해성·위험성을 적절히 판별하고 그 유해성에 따라 유독물질, 허가물질, 제한물질, 금지물질 등으로 지정하여 관리하는 것이다. 화평법에 대한 산업체의 올바른 이해는 신설된 화평법에 대한 정확한 대처와 법의 목적인 화학물질이 가질 수 있는 위해성으로부터 국민의 건강 및 환경보호 달성을 위해 반드시 필요하다. 화학물질은 용도, 사용량 및 독성자료 등을 통해 평가가 이루어지며, 이에 따라 유독물, 허가물질, 제한물질, 금지물질 등으로 지정되게 된다.
유독물지정제도에 대한 유해화학물질관리자 및 전문가의 인식도 분석 연구
김미나,이승길,두용균,조삼래,최재욱,Kim, Mi Na,Lee, Seung Kil,Doo, Yong Kyoon,Cho, Sam Rae,Choi, Jae-Wook 한국환경보건학회 2015 한국환경보건학회지 Vol.41 No.6
Objectives: Poisonous substances experts engage in policymaking regarding poisonous substances, whereas poisonous substances managers perform legal duties related to poisonous substances management systems at worksites. To understand and improve poisonous substances designation systems, it is necessary to distinguish the roles of these experts and managers. We further aimed to identify problems with poisonous substances appointment systems and provide basic data for their improvement by investigating the knowledge and recognition of the need for system improvement among managers and experts. Methods: To determine the $subjects^{\circ}{\emptyset}$ awareness of poisonous substances designation systems, a selfadministered questionnaire comprised of items on general characteristics and knowledge and recognition of the need for system improvement was issued. Data were analyzed via t-tests and ANOVA using SPSS v 16.0 Results: Regarding system comprehension, managers (n=213; mean 3.28, SD 0.63) significantly differed from experts (n=35; mean 4.08, SD 0.59) (P<0.001). No differences were found in recognition of need for improvement between managers (mean 3.11, SD 0.34) and experts (mean 3.24, SD 0.31). Significant differences in comprehension were found among managers by education level (P<0.05) and company size (P<0.05). Regarding industry type, comprehension was greater in the electrical/electronic and chemical/environmental industries compared to in other industries (P = 0.066). Comprehension was higher among those with five years or more of experience compared to those with less than five years. Regarding recognition of need for improvement, managers showed significant differences by company size (P<0.05). $Experts^{\circ}{\emptyset}$ comprehension showed no differences by general characteristics, while need for improvement differed according to work experience (P<0.001). Conclusion: The study found that the bigger the company size, the higher the level of comprehension by managers and the experts. In the case of both groups, where a higher comprehension of the poisonous substances designation system was evident, they recognized the necessity of its improvement.
김경희(Kyung Hee Kim),이승길(Seung Kil Lee),송대종(Dae Jong Song),김해준(Hae-Joon Kim),조삼래(Sam Rae Cho),두용균(Yong Kyoon Doo),최재욱(Jae Wook Choi) 한국위험물학회 2013 한국위험물학회지 Vol.1 No.1
The purpose of this study was to determine the difference rate of the results for classification of chemicals by the criteria of GHS between Korea and Japan. A total of 200 chemicals with same Chemical Abstractive Service (CAS) number in Korea and Japan were finally selected for comparison. In order to determine the difference rate of for classification of chemicals, we compared the results in 15 classes (13 classes for health hazard and 2 classes for environmental hazard). Moreover, we analyzed the causes for leading to the different outcomes. The overall matching rate was 55.7%. The lowest matching rates were observed in ‘single exposure (27.5%)’ and ‘repeat exposure (37.0%)’ categories among the ‘specific target organ toxicity’ hazard class. Similarly, the highest matching rates were found in “Respiratory sensitization” and “Aspiration hazard” (94.0%, 91.0% for each). This study indicates that outcomes classified and labeled by GHS among countries could be different because they have performed the classification of chemicals by their own standards and interpretation of GHS. To minimize these differences, it is necessary to establish the technical guideline including the standardization for criteria of GHS internationally, the standardization of process in determination by experts, and provision of same reference list to be used, through an international or multi-party GHS expert committee.