http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Strip Casting 법으로 제조된 304 Stainless Steel 의 응고 미세조직
김재중,표성규,김낙준 대한금속재료학회(대한금속학회) 1999 대한금속·재료학회지 Vol.37 No.10
A study has been made of the effects of strip casting process variables on the microstructure of strip cast SUS 304 stainless steel. The main impetus for the present investigation is to suggest the optimum process variables for the strip casting of SUS 304 stainless steel based on the systematic studies of microstructural evolution. Results slow that there is a variation of microstructure through the thickness of strip. Along the surface of strip, the microstructure consists of fine dendrite and cellular structure, and there is also a formation of α' martensite and mechanical twin due to the deformation by roll contact. On the other hand, microstructure in the middle of strip consists of equiaxed grains due to slow solidification rate and recalescence. One of the most important finding is that there is a depletion of Mn in the interdendrite region and the presence of amorphous Si-rich particle.
한국과 중국 법원의 위법수집증거배제법칙 적용에 관한 비교법적 검토
김재중,진가 한양법학회 2019 漢陽法學 Vol.30 No.2
The evidence collected based on the illegal procedure is referred to as “improperly or illegally obtained evidence” and the issue of Exclusionary Rule of the Illegally Obtained Evidence is about whether such evidence is accepted or not. In accordance with common law of the United States, the Exclusionary Rule of the Illegally Obtained Evidence denies the evidence and secondary evidence obtained from the illegal investigation to prevent such evidence from utilized as the evidence of guilt. This study reviews on how Exclusionary Rule of the Illegally Obtained Evidence is applied on courts of South Korea and China, find issues to be addressed in china, and find improvement measures. The conclusions are as follows. First, Chinese court should make a legal organization by introducing investigation without physical detention, right to remain silent, warrant system, and participation of attorney during questioning of suspect to create the environment where Exclusionary Rule of the Illegally Obtained Evidence can be applied. Secondly, it’s hard to understand and identify the position of Supreme People’s Court toward Exclusionary Rule of the Illegally Obtained Evidence. Thus, there should be further researches on judicial precedents and establish unified precedent system in Supreme Court and local courts to acknowledge the legal binding force of the precedent from the local court in the similar case. Based on such legal binding force, Exclusionary Rule of the Illegally Obtained Evidence will be rooted well. Third, Exclusionary Rule of the Illegally Obtained Evidence is limitedly applied on serious crimes such as murder, injury, rape, or drug in China. Thus, Exclusionary Rule of the Illegally Obtained Evidence should be applied on the minor crimes to guarantee the human rights of the defendant. Fourth, the admissibility of evidence is limited based on the Exclusionary Rule of the Illegally Obtained Evidence. Since the exclusionary rule is applied on verbal evidence, the detailed application scope and criteria should be suggested on non-verbal evidence. Fifth, Exclusionary Rule of the Illegally Obtained Evidence is merely a compelled confession rule in China. Thus, Confession Requiring Corroborating Evidence should be introduced together to protect the defendant in the forced confession by the investigative institute.