http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
범죄자를 상담하는 보호관찰상담사의 심리적 경험에 대한 현상학적 연구
김나진 ( Najin Kim ),김영자 ( Youngja Kim ),라수현 ( Soonhyun La ) 사단법인 아시아문화학술원 2021 인문사회 21 Vol.12 No.1
본 연구는 보호관찰상담사가 보호관찰소에서 범죄자를 상담하면서 겪는 심리적 경험을 탐색하고자 하였으며, 보호관찰상담사는 범죄자들의 어떤 부분에 초점을 두고 그들을 대하는지, 보호관찰대상자들이 범죄자라는 사실이 그들을 상담하는데 어떤 영향을 미쳤는지를 밝히고자 하였다. 이를 현상학적 연구방법을 통해 현장에서 경험하는 보호관찰상담사의 심리적 경험을 드러내고자 하였다. 결과분석에서 도출된 넓은 의미의 주제는 총 4개로 첫 번째 의미는 ‘일반인과 다른 사람들’, 두 번째 의미는 ‘범죄자이기 때문에’, 세 번째 의미는 ‘상담사 이전에 인간으로서’, 네 번째 의미는 ‘새로운 시각으로 보게 됨’으로 나타났다. 전체적인 상위주제와 하위주제로는 범죄자에게 갖게 되는 부정적인 인식들과 그로 인해 온전하게 믿지 못하는 상담사의 갈등과 한계로 딜레마에 빠졌던 상담사가 자기를 성찰하고 범죄자를 하나의 존재로 바라보게 되었다. 이러한 결과를 토대로 범죄자들의 재범을 예방하고, 그들이 사회에서 건강한 삶을 사는데 도움을 주기 위한 방법으로 보호관찰상담사에게 필요한 인식과 태도, 상담개입 방향에 대해 제시하였다. The study focused on finding what a probation counselor experience in counseling a criminal in a probation office, and aimed to reveal what the probation counselors focus on the criminal, and how the fact that the counselee is a criminal affected the counseling. Using a phenomenological research method, four broad themes were deducted analyzing the results; the first was ‘People different from the ordinary people’, the second was ‘Since the counselee is a criminal’, the third was ‘As a human before being a counselor’, and the fourth was ‘Have come to see from a new perspective’. The general topic and sub-topic were about the negative recognition to criminals, the following conflict and limitation of a counselor, being unable to solely trust, and about the process to look back upon self in order to perform the role as a counselor and becoming able to see a criminal as one being. Based on these results, I presented the needed recognition and attitude of a probation counselor to prevent recidivism and help the counselee live a healthy life in the society, and the counseling intervention plan.
표준화 환자를 이용한 임상수행능력평가시험 (CPX)에서 교수와 표준화 환자의 평가 결과 비교
권복규(Ivo Kwon),김나진(Najin Kim),이순남(Soon Nam Lee),어은경(Eunkyung Eo),박혜숙(Hyesook Park),이동현(Dong Hyeon Lee),박미혜(Mi Hae Park),오지영(Jee-Young Oh),한재진(Jae Jin Han),허정원(Jung-Won Huh),유경하(Kyung Ha Ryu) 한국의학교육학회 2005 Korean journal of medical education Vol.17 No.2
Purpose: To compare the evaluation results of faculties to those of Standardized Patients (SP) participating in a Clinical Performance Examination (CPX) administered at Ewha Womans University College of Medicine. Methods: The CPX was taken by 77 fourth year medical students. Cases and checklist were developed by the medical school consortium in capital area. Six cases were used and 24 SPs participated and evaluated the students’ performances. The whole session was recorded on videotapes so that 6 medical school faculties could analyze and evaluate the students performances as well. The results were compared and analyzed by SPSS package. Results: The agreement between the faculties and the SPs was relatively good (r=0.79), but not good enough. In every case, SPs gave higher marks than did the faculties. Clear disease entity cases like hepatitis and anemia showed better agreement than obscure clinical contexts such as bad news delivery . Better agreement was seen in the items of physical exam category (r=0.91), but the agreement was very poor in the items of doctor-patient (Dr-Pt) relationship category (r=0.54). The construction of checklist and the character of each evaluation item should influence the differences. Conclusion: More detailed guidelines and clear/specific evaluating items are necessary to improve the agreement rate. In certain categories like physical exam and brief history taking, the SP s evaluation can replace the faculties , but for complex contexts like Dr-Pt relationship.