RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 酪農經營의 韓日間 比較 分析

        權五鈺 영남대학교 자원문제연구소 1984 資源問題硏究 Vol.3 No.-

        The dairy farming condition of Korea is generally similar to that of Japan. However, there are significant differences in the productive efficiency and technical status of dairlring between the two countries. This analysis finds out the reasons that cause the differences in milk production cost and milk production. Thus it will offer basic informations to improve dairy form management. 1. Considering the average farming size, milk production per cow, labor requirement per hand, and composition of head size, the overall situation of Korean dairy farming management in 1980 was very similar to that of Japan in early 1970's. 2. Low rate of interest in Japan enables capital-intensive dairy management especially in farm building and machinery, where as Korean situation of dairying shows labor-intensive operation because of wage level. 3. The income per labor day of Japanese dairy operation in capital-intensive mangement is much higher than that of Korea, Moreover, Japan also shows faverable result in general productivity (return per cow) including capital efficiency. 4. In Japan, culled-meat/milk price ratio is higher than Korea that makes it relatively easier to replace cows according to production and shorten the productive year, and this seems to be an important factor to increase the rate of culled dairy meat in total meat supply.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        쇠고기 브랜드육에 대한 소비자 반응과 브랜드화 정착방안

        권오옥,김성웅 한국농업정책학회 2005 농업경영정책연구 Vol.32 No.1

        The purpose of this study is to suggest a plan for brand beef priority by researching and analyzing customers` reflection on brand beef mainly with questionnaire with 500 of consumers living in the Capital Territory, South Korea. The results of this research can be summarized as follows; first, on recognition rate of brand beef, 57.6% of the total respondents answered that they had never heard about it, while 41.7% of them answered they had heard. Second, on taste and quality of the brand beef, `good` was 20.2%, `bad` was 0.6%, and `not clear` and no answer were the others. Third, for their reliability of the consumers who recognize brand beef, `rely` was 26% and `not rely` was 15%. Fourth, according to the research on `Will you purchase the beef brand in the future?` if the quality and safety are secured even though the price is high, 60.8% answered `I will purchase,` and 26.8% answered `I will not purchase.` Stable settlement can be expected when we increase belief by raising quality and safety, and increase recognition of beef brand by effective advertisement for low income and low educational level as well as securing fixed consuming bracket through more active marketing strategy for the high income and high educational level.

      • 농촌 활성화를 위한 그린투어리즘 추진방안

        권오옥,김천성 한국협동조합학회 2002 韓國協同組合硏究 Vol.20 No.2

        This research adopted green tourism as a device to find out a way out of the hard situation of agriculture and agrarian reality, Through green tourism it will provide a new space of rest and recreation to the urban citizens. To the rural area it will provide opportunities of revenue by selling agricultural produce, processed speciality, and food with tourism, thus promote activation of rural area. The main subject of green tourism is how to preserve the natural environment while increasing farm revenue, and maintain the community of the tourists, and keeping clean environment. For the successful promotion of green tourism, the establishment of management ideology is important. First, to whom, what, and how will it be provided? Second, select the sites by evaluating the resources of the agriculture and the farm. Third, establish long-term and short-term investment plans. Fourth, set up integral marketing strategies. The best advertisement could be obtained by the tourists. Fifth, the farmers in the area should take the initiatives and work for the benefits of the community

      • KCI등재
      • 畜産物 生産費 計算의 理論的 考察

        權五鈺 건국대학교 1988 論文集 Vol.27 No.2

        With the increase of the national income and its population, livestock production demand whose elastic value is quite high, increases rapidly and is expected to keep on growing. In the early 1980's, we experience the shortage of beef. With the increase of cattle we this time have surplus of its supply, and this results in the fall of cattle price and livestock household has a hard time in operation. It seems the most important subject is to reduce the production cost and improve the ways of operation to relieve the price of unstable livestock and to raise the international competition with the recent demand. The livestock production cost refers to the total amount that covers feed, veterinary and medicine, supplies for other resources, labor and capital interest The condition on the production cost accounting is as follows : 1. It should be shown in money value. 2. It should be used to make the planned production. 3. It should be spent on the normal activities of production. One classifies the production cost into several different cost items, and then computes all of the items in the accounting, the consisted factors of the cost is divided on its nature of cost. Since the production cost accounting is a kind of object accounting, all the production cost resulted in the operation should be added on the production of accounting object, milk, beef cattle, hog, broiler and egg. In the livestock production cost accounting, one also classifies its goods and services with the substantial livestock production and calls it costs for the reader's easy understanding. To classify in detail is to see what kinds of economic values are consumed, and this contributes to easy computation.

      • 韓牛肥育經營의 收益性에 관한 硏究

        權五鈺 건국대학교 1978 論文集 Vol.7 No.1

        The recent increase of the G.N.P. for the Koreans has the necessity of the increased beef production. The Korean cattle, which were raised as draft cattle for the past 1,500 years, must be raised to meet the beef demand. This necessitates changes in the rattle raising for drafting into beef-production, and also over-all changes in the cattle raising. This study was carried to investigate both the status and the profitability of fattening management of the Korean cattle on the basis of the samples selected carefully. Theresults of this study can be summarized as follows: 1.The regional distribution of Korean cattle is 20% in Kyungbug, 16.4% in Kyung-nam, 11.6% in Choong-nam, 13.2% in Chun-nam, 10.8% in Kyung-gi, and 9.5% in Kang-won. 2.The total meat production shows a 528% increase in the last 15 years. But the supply of meat does not chow a similliar increase. An efficient supply-erasure is critically needed to get rid of the gab between the supply and the demand. 3.The most common combination of enterprises was the farming system with cattle fattening and cropping. Eleven farms among the sample farms have the same type of enterprise. 4.In school career and age of farmers, about 50% of the total farmers was primary school graduates, only 2 per cent of the farmers was from college graduates. Age of the farmers of the sampled farms was 26 up to 68. 5. Most of farmers have less than five years of experience in feeding Korean cattle for beef production. 6.Eleven farms had less than five head, five farms to the head size of 10-20, and 4 farms to 30 head or more. 7.The size of building for five head size group was about 10.7 pyong (2.3 pyong/head). The size with 10-20 head was 33.2 pyong(2.3 pyong/head) and the size with 30 head or more was 132 pyong (2.2 pyong/head). 8.Days of labor used per farm and hours of labor used per head proved to be 59.1 days and 345.7 hours respectively. The hours of family labor among them was 170.2 hours on the average, 165.2 hours which accounts for 48% of total labor was supplied by hired labor. The capital investment per farm was 11,448,000 wan, however, the one per head 669,000 won. The capital investment consisted of the investment (44.5%) for animal (31.8%) for land (12.5%) for buildings, (9.0%) for current assets and (2.2%) for equipment machinery. 10.The average acrage of pasture land per farm was 0.1 Chung be and the acrage of feed crop land per farm was 0.24 chung bo 11.It was shown that the average in-put per farm was 51,174kg in T.D.N. while the average in-put per head was 1,475kg in T.D.N. 12.The proportions of concentrate and roughages to total feed were 41% and 59% respectively, while 6.52kg of T.D.N. was feed on the average a day and 8.12kg of T.D.N. was used for 1kg of weight gain. 13.An average live weight gain and the value of gain per head were 85.25kg and 109,996 won during the fattening period. While daily weight gain and the value per head reached to 0.78kg and 1,003 won. 14.The gross income is made up of receipts from gains (96.2%) and by-products (3.8%), where the gross income per farm wart in average 4,346,480 won and the gross income per head was 254,180 won on the average. 15.However, operational expenditures per farm was 3,154,260 won, the expenditures per head were 184,459 won on the average. Of expenditures, the feed cost, shown 74% of total cost, was very high. 16.The production cost per farm among them was 4,376,161 won and the cost per head reached to 255,916 won. 17.On the other hand, the average income per farm was 1,292,628 won, and 83,398 won was the income per head. 18.It was found that only the farms with herd size of 30 head of more could find their net returns of 9,610 won. 19.The average net returns to a family labor proved to be around 475,748 won, in case of (a) and 428,407 won in case of (b). While the average net returns to a family per day were 1,367 won in (a) and 1,263 won in (b). 20.The returns to owned capital was 614,607 won in (a) and 638,498 won in (b). But the average returns to 100 won of owned capital was 3.1 wan in (a) and 5.4 won in (b). 21.Income ratio per farm wart high as 29.7% and the employment ratio of hired laborer was around 6.3% profit rate proved to be 11.3% in the sampled farms.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼