중국학계가 보는 한반도 남북학계의 고구려연구(1)

權赫秀(Quan, He-Xiu) 백산학회 2003 白山學報 Vol.- No.67

Korea was Confronted with crisis in the wake of open door policy in the last stage of 19th century. In these circumstances, many Koreans staged various movements in fields of politics, economics, Social and cultural parts. We called it as enlightenment drives. The enlightenment movement demanded the reform history education. Therefor the government Publised the history textbook, and the traditional history was changed its character as new history. In the wake of modern history’s development, korean history including Shin, Chae-Ho began to Study the ancient history. In their Studies we wold find lost past specially old chosun and Koguryo Jong, In-Bo was noted Patriotic and nationalism-minded historian. He looked for the Korean spirit as Shin, Chae-Ho and studied the Wang-Ge-To monument. These nationalist historians denied Japanese Flum keyism, they finded our spirit and identity. Ahm, Jae-Hong, noted nationalist historian Claimed the Korean Studies. Leading positivism-minded historian including Lee, Byong-Do, kim, Sang-Ki and Lee, Sang-Baek established the Jin-Dan Society in 1934. This is the starting point to modern history. On the Other hand, a group of materialists including Paik, Nanm-Hoon, Kim, Seok-Hyong, Park, Si-Hyong and Jon, Seok-Dam introduced the marxim in Korea. After 1945, they played an important roles in North Korea.

The Chinese Press’ Reporting and Commentary on Imperial Japan’s Forced Annexation of the Taehan Empire

Quan Hexiu(權赫秀) 고려대학교 한국사연구소 2011 International Journal of Korean History Vol.16 No.2

1910년 일제의 한국강제병합 당시 중국 언론은 그와 관련된 보도와 논평을 대량 발표하면서 일본을 제외하고 한국병합 문제를 가장 폭넓고 깊이 있게 관심해 온 외국 언론이라고 할 수 있는데 본고의 고찰을 통해 대체로 다음과 같은 세 가지 결론을 얻을 수 있다. 첫째, 당시 중국 언론은 한국병합에 관한 직접적인 소식원을 갖지 못하였으며 또한 일제당국에 의한 철저한 보도통제로 말미암아 한국병합관련 보도와 논평의 정확성 면에 있어서 상당한 문제점을 보였지만 일제의 한국강제병합이 사실상 “병탄”이라는 식민 침략적 본질 및 그와 관련된 일본의 침략본성을 정확하게 지적하였고 결과적으로 한국병합 당시 가장 동정적인 시각과 입장에서 가장 많은 보도와 논평을 발표한 외국 언론이라고 할 수 있다. 둘째, 당시 중국 언론의 한국병합관련 보도와 논평은 무엇보다도 조선왕조 및 대한제국의 “망국”을 슬퍼하고 동정하는 기조와 더불어 그와 관련된 일본의 침략 근성 및 중국에 대한 침략위협을 크게 강조하였는데 심지어 일본정부의 외교적 항의까지 불러일으킬 정도였다. 그 중 일본유학중인 한국학생이 청나라 해군고찰 대신에게 한국의 구원을 요청하는 서신 및 한국병합을 애통해 하는 마음에서 3일 동안의 공동행동을 실시한다는 미국 내 중국인 단체의 통전내용은 모두 중국 언론의 보도에 의해 새롭게 알려진 중요한 역사적 사실이다. 셋째로 당시 중국 언론은 한국의 “망국”교훈을 다양한 시각으로 분석하면서 아울러 청정부의 정치개혁 및 중국국민의 각성을 적극 촉구하였는데 여기서 한국역사와 문화 특히 한중 두 나라 전통적 역사관계에 대한 중국 중심주의적 시각 등 많은 문제점을 노출하기도 하였다. The Chinese press released a large volume of reports and commentaries pertaining to the Japanese annexation of Korea in 1910. The Chinese press at the time can be regarded as having been the foreign press that, outside of Japan, dealt with the annexation of Korea in the broadest and profoundest manner. Based on the analysis of this article, the following three conclusions can be reached. First, the Chinese press at the time did not have any direct sources of information related to the annexation of Korea. Furthermore, clear problems were evident in terms of the precision of their reporting and commentaries related to the annexation of Korea, a situation that was caused in large part by the thorough control exercised by the Japanese authorities. Nevertheless, they saliently understood the colonial nature of this exercise by stating that the forced annexation of Korea was in fact the ‘absorption’ of its territory undertaken as part of Japan’s territorial ambitions. Consequently, the Chinese press should be perceived as the foreign press that released the most sympathetic reports and commentaries on the annexation. Secondly, along with laments and showing sympathy for the “national collapse” of the Chos?n dynasty and the Taehan Empire, the Chinese press’ reports and commentaries on the annexation of Korea greatly emphasized the expansionist nature of Japan and the threat it posed to China. Their reports and commentaries were deemed to be so problematic for Japan that they caused a diplomatic row with the Japanese government. In this regard, a letter written by a Korean student in Japan to a Chinese naval minister and a telegram from a Chinese organization in the United States stating that they had mourned the passage of Korea for three days, both of which were subsequently published in Chinese newspapers, can be considered as important materials that shed some light on the perceptions and responses of the Chinese press and society to the Japanese annexation of Korea. Thirdly, the Chinese press analyzed the lessons of the “national collapse” of Korea from various vantage points and urged the Qing government to undertake necessary political reforms and the Chinese people to awaken to the dangers that confronted them. During this process, many problems such as the Sinocentric view of Korean history and culture, in particular as pertained to the traditional historical relationship between the two countries, were exposed.

『吳淸卿獻策論』을 통해 본 淸政府의 對朝鮮 干涉政策

權赫秀(Quan He-xiu) 한국학중앙연구원 2000 장서각 Vol.- No.4

I found Ochonggyoung-Honchakron(吳淸卿獻策論, Wuqingqing-Xiancelun) in Changso-gak(藏書閣) of the Academy of Korean Studies, and also carried on the earliest study on it. I got three conclusions through my study: First, Ochonggyoung-Honchakron is a book suggesting policies to King of Chosen(朝鮮), Kojong(高宗) by Wu Ta-ch'eng(吳大?), the representative of Qing Government(淸政府) before his returning in February. 2nd 1885. It was suggested individually on the surface by Wu Ta-ch'eng and Xu Chang(續昌) the vice-representative, in fact, it was acted according to the secret instruction by the Qing Government. Secondly, Wu Ta-ch'eng was the official of the famous Purist Party(淸流黨, Qingliu-dang) in the Late Qing(晩淸), he was responsible for dealing the business for Li Hung-Chang(李鴻章) before Kapsin Coup d'? · tat(甲申政變). After Kapsin Coup d'? · tat, he and Xu Chang were ordered to lead Qing military(淸軍) to Korea by the Qing Government. During his stay in Korea, his main duty is to investigate the true story of Kapsin Coup d'? · tat, to negotiate with Korean government, and also to negotiate with Japanese government for peaceful settlement of the problems raising from Kapsin Coup d'? · tat and strengthening Qing's influence in Korea. Thirdly, Ochonggyoung-Honchakron includes 6 policy suggestions all concerned with the domestic affairs like politics, economics and military. Even though there is never more special new things in it, it shows the intervention policy in Korean domestic affairs by Qing Government. I found six copies of Ochonggyoung-Honchakron in Changso-gak of Academy of Korean Studies and other libraries(奎章閣&國立中央圖書館), but which have not been made public and studied yet. I think it can be considered as an important historical materials for studying the Korean modern history and the modern relationship between Korea and China.

근대이래 중한(中韓)양국의 상호인식 -황염배(黃炎培)의 『조선(朝鮮)』과 이시영(李始榮)의 『감시만어(感時漫語)』를 중심으로

권혁수 ( He Xiu Quan ) 연세대학교 사회과학연구소 2007 社會科學論集 Vol.38 No.1

Korea(朝鮮) was published by Huang Yan-pei(黃炎培) in September, 1929 who is a famous educator and politician. The works is the most detailed and all-sided one in introducing the basic condition of Korea, but its record and comment was untrue and distored for Korea which was dominated by Japan, because it depended on the help of Japanese colonization government. Accordingly, Lee Si-young(李始榮) who was a leading member of Korea temporary government and struggling against Japan in China wrote a works, Gam-si-man-euh(感時漫語) which criticized and retorted Huang Yan-pei`s false recognition and record for history, culture and actuality of Korea. It was related to positive recognition and understanding between two nations and peoples of China and Korea in modern time, and had bad affection for modern historical relationship between two nations.

金玉均과 中國

權赫秀(Quan He-Xiu) 한국학중앙연구원 2000 한국학 Vol.23 No.3

한중관계의 근대적 전환과정에서 나타난 비밀 외교채널 : 李鴻章과 李裕元의 往復書信을 중심으로

권혁수 한양대학교 한국학연구소 2003 韓國學論集 Vol.37 No.-