http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 權赫秀(Quan He-Xiu) (검색결과 5 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
權赫秀(Quan, He-Xiu) 백산학회 2003 白山學報 Vol.- No.67
Korea was Confronted with crisis in the wake of open door policy in the last stage of 19th century. In these circumstances, many Koreans staged various movements in fields of politics, economics, Social and cultural parts. We called it as enlightenment drives. The enlightenment movement demanded the reform history education. Therefor the government Publised the history textbook, and the traditional history was changed its character as new history. In the wake of modern history’s development, korean history including Shin, Chae-Ho began to Study the ancient history. In their Studies we wold find lost past specially old chosun and Koguryo Jong, In-Bo was noted Patriotic and nationalism-minded historian. He looked for the Korean spirit as Shin, Chae-Ho and studied the Wang-Ge-To monument. These nationalist historians denied Japanese Flum keyism, they finded our spirit and identity. Ahm, Jae-Hong, noted nationalist historian Claimed the Korean Studies. Leading positivism-minded historian including Lee, Byong-Do, kim, Sang-Ki and Lee, Sang-Baek established the Jin-Dan Society in 1934. This is the starting point to modern history. On the Other hand, a group of materialists including Paik, Nanm-Hoon, Kim, Seok-Hyong, Park, Si-Hyong and Jon, Seok-Dam introduced the marxim in Korea. After 1945, they played an important roles in North Korea.
-
權赫秀(Quan He-xiu) 한국학중앙연구원 2000 장서각 Vol.- No.4
I found Ochonggyoung-Honchakron(吳淸卿獻策論, Wuqingqing-Xiancelun) in Changso-gak(藏書閣) of the Academy of Korean Studies, and also carried on the earliest study on it. I got three conclusions through my study: First, Ochonggyoung-Honchakron is a book suggesting policies to King of Chosen(朝鮮), Kojong(高宗) by Wu Ta-ch'eng(吳大?), the representative of Qing Government(淸政府) before his returning in February. 2nd 1885. It was suggested individually on the surface by Wu Ta-ch'eng and Xu Chang(續昌) the vice-representative, in fact, it was acted according to the secret instruction by the Qing Government. Secondly, Wu Ta-ch'eng was the official of the famous Purist Party(淸流黨, Qingliu-dang) in the Late Qing(晩淸), he was responsible for dealing the business for Li Hung-Chang(李鴻章) before Kapsin Coup d'? · tat(甲申政變). After Kapsin Coup d'? · tat, he and Xu Chang were ordered to lead Qing military(淸軍) to Korea by the Qing Government. During his stay in Korea, his main duty is to investigate the true story of Kapsin Coup d'? · tat, to negotiate with Korean government, and also to negotiate with Japanese government for peaceful settlement of the problems raising from Kapsin Coup d'? · tat and strengthening Qing's influence in Korea. Thirdly, Ochonggyoung-Honchakron includes 6 policy suggestions all concerned with the domestic affairs like politics, economics and military. Even though there is never more special new things in it, it shows the intervention policy in Korean domestic affairs by Qing Government. I found six copies of Ochonggyoung-Honchakron in Changso-gak of Academy of Korean Studies and other libraries(奎章閣&國立中央圖書館), but which have not been made public and studied yet. I think it can be considered as an important historical materials for studying the Korean modern history and the modern relationship between Korea and China.
-
근대이래 중한(中韓)양국의 상호인식 -황염배(黃炎培)의 『조선(朝鮮)』과 이시영(李始榮)의 『감시만어(感時漫語)』를 중심으로
권혁수 ( He Xiu Quan ) 연세대학교 사회과학연구소 2007 社會科學論集 Vol.38 No.1
Korea(朝鮮) was published by Huang Yan-pei(黃炎培) in September, 1929 who is a famous educator and politician. The works is the most detailed and all-sided one in introducing the basic condition of Korea, but its record and comment was untrue and distored for Korea which was dominated by Japan, because it depended on the help of Japanese colonization government. Accordingly, Lee Si-young(李始榮) who was a leading member of Korea temporary government and struggling against Japan in China wrote a works, Gam-si-man-euh(感時漫語) which criticized and retorted Huang Yan-pei`s false recognition and record for history, culture and actuality of Korea. It was related to positive recognition and understanding between two nations and peoples of China and Korea in modern time, and had bad affection for modern historical relationship between two nations.
-
-
RISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
