http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
서동석 ( Suh Dong-suk ) 대한영어영문학회 2002 영어영문학연구 Vol.28 No.1
Emerson is a practical as well as an idealistic man. His main concern is to duly keep the trembling balance between the poles of life: the real and the ideal, man and nature, matter and mind, East and West and so on. He tries to harmonize these bipolarities and incarnate the dualistic unity in his life and literature. His neutrality is a result of his unyielding effort to obtain objective truthfulness. Many critics say that after his son Waldo’s death early in 1842, his cosmic optimism was severly changed. Strictly speaking, however, as the characteristics of his bipolar thought, the scepticism inherent in his optimism emerged and thus the trembling balance of both was kept. Through his spiritual metamorphoses, he pursues the harmony and balance of the extremes. Although he is often blamed for showing inconsistency, his “double consciousness” is a key “to the old knots of fate.” Truth exists, not in the isolated vacuum, but in the associated and harmonized whole of individual and bipolar facts. Consequently, it is in the “middle region,” both receiving and transcending contradiction of bipolarity. Since his second mental crisis, Confucianism has become a guide for his philosophy of living. His double consciousness is similar to Confucian wisdom of the Golden Mean. He says, “Life is not a dialectics.” Accordingly, “the noblest theory of life” cannot explain its total meaning. “The true art of life” is, then, “to skate well” amid two ways of life: reception and transcendence, progression and regression. In this sense, his “stupendous antagonism” against fate as a “tyrannous circumstance” leads to a need for his creative metamorphosis, for a new order of life. His antagonism, as Lopez points out, needs “the continual interplay of both positive and negative powers,” and naturally it brings about his “inconsistency.” As Feidelson notes, however, this inconsistency is “the source of his power.” Emerson argues that our “anchorage is quicksand.” Just as nature has a fluid tendency, so our life has a “onward trick,” and we need “change of objects.” In this respect, “the transcendentalism of common life” is a living attitude and philosophy, in search of a “new center.” The self-reliance is acquired through the incessant pursuit of neutrality. < Seonam University >
우리나라 제조업의 생산적효율성 결정요인 분석 -무역자유화 기간을 중심으로-
서동석 ( Dong Suk Suh ) 기술경영경제학회 1995 Journal of Technology Innovation Vol.3 No.1
본 연구는 한국 제조업의 기업별 <패널>자료를 이용하여 확률적 생산함수를 추정한 다음, 우리나라의 주종 수출산업인 섬유산업과 전자산업의 기술적 효율성이 1980년대에 하락한 이유를 규명하기 위하여 동쪽산업내의 각 기업들의 기술적 효율성의 결정요인을 계량분석을 통해 분석하였다. 성장산업인 전자산업과 사양산업인 섬유산업의 산업내 (intra-industry) 기술적 효율성의 결정요인은 相異하였다. 성장산업인 전자산업의 경우, 상대적인 기업의 크기와 노동비용의 상대적 크기는 기술적 효율성과 각각 正의 관계를 보이고 있는 데 비해, 사양산업인 섬유산업의 경우, 총 매출액에서 수출이 차지하는 비중과 기술적 호율성은 正의 관계를 보인 데 反해, 총 생산비에서 노동비용이 차지하는 비중은 기술적 효율성과 負의 관계를 보였다. 즉 1980년대 섬유산업의 기술적 효율성이 하락한 중요한 요인은 동 산업의 수출부진과 상대적인 노동비용의 상승을 들 수 있으며, 성장산업인 전자산업의 경우는 일부 대기업의 집중도 심화가 동 산업의 평균적 기술적 효율성의 하락요인이 되었음을 알 수 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 경쟁의 촉진과 기업 집중도의 완화가 기술적 효율성을 향상시키는 데 중요하다는 점을 보여주고 있다.