하지수술환자에서 지주막하차단에 미치는 척추경막외 병용마취의 효과

윤진석,김영수,정병기,하정성,조성경 대한마취과학회 1997 Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Vol.33 No.4

Background : Combined spinal epidural anesthesia(CSE) often produces a more extensive spinal block than expected. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of CSE on subarachnoid block in patients undergoing lower extremity surgery. Methods : Thirty-three patients who undergone lower extremity surgeries were randomly allocated to three groups of 11 patients each. Using needle through needle technique, all patients received a subarachnoid injection of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine 1.6∼2.0 ml through a 25G Whitacre spinal needle. Group 1 received no extradural injection for 25min, but group 2 and 3 received extradural saline 10 ml and bupivacaine 10 ml 5min after the subarachnoid injection, respectively. Levels of sensory and motor block were assessed at 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, and 25 min after subarachnoid injection. Results : The median values of maximum sensory block level were T7 in all groups. Levels of sensory blockade and the time to onset of maximum sensory blockade were similar among the three groups There was no significant difference in the degree of motor block among three groups. Conclusions : This study suggests that extradural saline 10 ml or 0.5% bupivacaine 10 ml which injected 5min after subarachnoid injection does not significantly influence the level of subarachnoid block in lower extremity surgical patients. However, further study is required to declare the safety or optimal dose of extradural injection during CSE. (Korean J Anesthesiol 1997; 33: 686∼691)

5∼6세기 신라 사탁부 갈문왕

윤진석 대구사학회 2010 대구사학 Vol.100 No.-

Galmunwang as Captain Satak Department was passed on power even since King Nulji had proclaimed heir who was Bokho to the throne. Meanwhile he had turned out many queen consorts, and had them from Tak Department. Subsequently, he managed both systems which were Tak and Satak Department because he did not run his the department in despot of the established system. It is not succession that Jidoro Galmunwang was crowned in three years. In addition, Jijeungwang was not crowned as Maribgan like the conventional view, but rather as King of Silla he did. This understanding of Galmunwang is raised to need reviews about Marriage Principles of Silla royal in the conventional interpretation. Silla royal was married with Galmunwang family after Maribgan era. So if done right, Park Queen of Moryang department was temporarily emerged to avoid intermarriage because of King Jijeung and King Jinheung from Galmunwang family.

복강경 대장수술시 수술전 처치로 비위관 삽입은 반드시 필요한가?

윤진석,김선한,최규환,정재영,정춘식,이동근 대한외과학회 2001 대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집 Vol.2001 No.11

5세기 내물왕계 왕실의 계보 재검토-지증왕의 즉위배경과 관련하여-

윤진석 한국사학사학회 2022 韓國史學史學報 Vol.- No.46

It is necessary to analyze several issues to figure out the genealogy of the Silla royal family during the Maripgan period and the background behind the enthronement of King Jijeung including relations between King Jijeung and King Soji, whether King Galmun of Paho was Bokho or Misaheun, marital relations between King Jabi and King Soji, relations between King Galmun of Gibo and Naesuk Lee Beol-chan, and causal relations between the Sageumgap Event and King Jijeung's ascent to power. According to Samguksagi, King Jijeung and King Soji are second cousins of Jaejong relations. According to the royal history in Samgukyusa, they are an uncle and his nephew in a five-chon relation. Most of previous studies reported that they were an uncle and his nephew since King Jijeung was 24 years older than King Soji. They are, however, second cousins in the same generation of the royal family. The age gap of 24 years between them is due to the fact that King Soji was born between King Jabi that married a daughter of Misaheun in his middle forties. King Jabi and Lady Josaeng were brother and sister born in the 410s. Lady Josaeng gave birth to King Jijeung at the age of 20 or so in 437. King Jabi had King Soji in 461 in his middle or late forties. These facts offer an explanation about the age gap between the two kings. Samguksagi wrote that King Jijeung was an uncle of King Soji instead of his second cousin probably because King Soji was in the direct line of King Nulji that was the late king before King Jijeung. Samgukyusa records the history of King Jabi and his royal family, stating "The queen was a daughter of King Galmun of Paho or Mijilhee Gakgan or □□ Gakgan." Many previous studies understood that "King Galmun of Paho = Mijihee Gakgan = Miheun Gakgan" based on these records, having different opinions on whether he is Bokho or Misaheun. The opinion arguing that he was Misaheun led to a conclusion that he was King Galmun, having huge impacts on researches on King Galmun and the Bu system. However, Paho is Bokho, and Mijilhee is Misaheun. These two different lines of transmission derive from King Jabi that married a daughter of Bokho at a proper age for marriage and remarried a daughter of Misaheun in his middle or late forties. Since no Misaheun became King Galmun, previous studies that reviewed King Glamun and the Bu system based on the idea that Misaheun was King Galmun need to have a reconsideration. The queen of King Soji was Seonhye, a daughter of Naesuk Lee Beol-chan in the Enthronement of Soji Maripgan in Samguksagi and a daughter of King Galmun of Gibo in the History of the Royal Family in Samgukyusa. Many previous studies raised a possibility that Naesuk and Gibo were the same person. In addition, many interpreted that King Jijeung, a son of Gibo(Seupbo), was a brother of Lady Seonhye, a daughter of Naesuk and that King Jijeung eliminated King Soji to seize power after Lady Seonhye was sentenced to death after the Sageumgap event. Based on the dates of birth and the time of activities between King Jijeung, a son of Gibo, and Mulryeok and Geochilbu, a son and grandson of Naesuk, however, it is apparent to say that Gibo and Naesuk had an age gap of a generation or more between them. Moreover, there is a credibility issue in the transmission that Lady Seonhye was sentenced to death after the Sageumgap event in Dongsagangmok. It will be reasonable to understand that she had nothing to do with the event.

논문(論文) : 5~6세기 신라 사탁부 갈문왕

윤진석 대구사학회 2010 대구사학 Vol.100 No.-

Zn(II)porphyrin Helical Arrays: A Strategy to Overcome Conformational Heterogeneity by Host-Guest Chemistry

윤진석,Shanmugam Easwaramoorthi,김동호 대한화학회 2008 Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society Vol.29 No.1

Conformational heterogeneity of directly linked multiporphyrin arrays with larger molecular length retards their utilities in practical applications such as two-photon absorption and molecular photonic wire. In this regard, here we adopted a way to overcome the conformational heterogeneity through hydrogen bonding by selective binding of meso aryl substituents of porphyrins (host) with urea (guest) to form helical structure. Using steady-state and time-resolved spectroscopy, we observed the enhanced fluorescence quantum yield by ~1.8 to 2.4 times, enhanced anisotropy values and the disappearance of fast fluorescence decay component in the host-guest helical forms. In addition, the enhanced nonlinear optical responses of helical arrays infer the extended inter-porphyrin electronic coupling due to a significant change in dihedral angle between the neighboring porphyrin moieties. The current host-guest strategy will provide a guideline to improve the structural homogeneity of the photonic wire.

잘 싸야 건강하다

윤진석 한국화장실협회 2002 아름다운 작은공간美小空 Vol.26 No.-

카메라를 이용한 자동차 운전자의 졸음감지

윤진석,한민흥 대한산업공학회 1996 대한산업공학회 추계학술대회논문집 Vol.1996 No.10

한국고대 ‘부체제(部體制)’의 기초적 이해와 과제

윤진석 계명사학회 2010 계명사학 Vol.21 No.-

한국 고대 부체제의 형성과정과 운영방식 재검토 -部의 내부구조와 왕권과의 관계를 중심으로-

윤진석 한국고대사탐구학회 2019 한국고대사탐구 Vol.32 No.-

Those who argue for the Bu system explain that "Bu" was a half-independent unit political entity "united" based on regionalism, that kings were not transcendent men of power but the masters of Jebus or representatives of Gans, and that multiple Bus were united by the primary force of royal authority. However, the Bu where a king belonged should have higher status than the other Bus in order to break from the alliance of nations and establish the Bu system. Strictly speaking, thus, it is not proper to say that "Kings were the masters of Jebus or representatives of Gans." By revising this expression and focusing on the "authority represented by a king," one may discover some parts where the viewpoint for the Bu system theory meets the viewpoint against the theory. Regarding the patterns that multiple groups existed within a Bu and formed relations individually with a king during the same periods based on historical materials, those who argue for the Bu system also explain that each Bu was an integrated self-governing body with a head and multiple self-governing bodies(Bus within a Bu) in each Bu. A close look at historical materials, however, shows that the internal organization of each Bu did not include a hereditary head in all Bus and that there were various patterns. It was because different Bus were not founded for the same or similar chances but various ones. Bus must thus have formed various tribute relations with a king rather than uniform ones by the Bu. There were some misunderstandings about the time when the Bu system was established in Silla. Recalling that previous studies on the Bu system theory distinguished the time of the Bu system-based political management from the time when the Six Bus system was established, the investigator provided his opinions about their time and the reorganization of the Bu system. While individuals Bus in Goguryeo were in the size of an Eup and Rak state with several Eups and Raks combined together, the Six Bus in Silla were Eups and Raks that formed the Eup and Rak state Saroguk. In this sense, there is a need to review again the old viewpoint that each of Silla's Six Bus had the nature of a unit political entity. Recent opinions argue that each of Silla's Six Bus had different duties in the social division of labor earlier on and that the dense groups of tombs in north Wolseong were the cemeteries of the five Bus except for Moryang Bu. Based on these opinions, it is likely that the Six Bus formed a joint community of rulers in Wanggyeong earlier on. 部體制論 입론자는 ‘部’가 地緣을 바탕으로 ‘결속된’ 半독립적인 단위정치체이며, 왕은 초월자적인 권력자는 아니며, 諸部의 大加 또는 干들의 대표와 같은 존재였고, 복수의 부를 결속시키는 일차적인 힘은 왕의 집권력이라고 설명한다. 그러나 실상 國연맹을 탈피하고 부체제가 성립하기 위해서는 국왕이 소속한 부가 여타 諸部에 비해 높은 위상을 갖추어야 될 것이므로, 엄밀히 말해 “왕은 … 제부의 大加 또는 干들의 대표와 같은 존재였다.”는 표현은 적합하지 않다. 이 표현을 수정하고 “왕을 대표로 하는 집권력”이라는 지적에 주목하면 부체제론의 시각이 부체제 부정론의 시각과 일정 부분 맞닿아 있는 점을 발견할 수 있다. 부체제론 입론자는 사료상 동일한 시기에 한 部내에 여러 집단이 공존하고 이들이 개별적으로 국왕과 관계를 맺은 양상에 대해, 각 부가 통합적인 자치체로서, 각 部內에 1인의 長과 복수의 자치체(部內部)가 존재했다고 설명한다. 그러나 사료를 면밀히 살펴보면, 각 부의 내부구성은 모든 부에 세습되는 부장이 있었던 것이 아니라 다양한 양상으로 존재했다. 이는 각 부가 동일・유사한 계기로 성립된 것이 아니라 다양한 계기로 성립되었기 때문으로 여겨지고, 따라서 국왕과의 납공관계도 部別로 맺어진 것이 아니라 다양한 양상이었을 것으로 여겨진다. 신라 부체제의 성립시기에 대해서는 종래 일정의 오해가 있었다. 이 글에서는 부체제론의 선행연구들이 부체제적 정치운영의 이행시기와 6부체제의 성립시기를 구분하고 있음을 상기하고, 양자의 성립시기와 부체제 재편에 대한 필자의 견해를 밝혔다. 고구려의 개별 部는 각각이 여러 개의 읍락이 합쳐진 읍락국가 규모였던 데 반해, 신라 6부는 각각이 읍락국가 사로국을 형성한 읍락들이었다. 이러한 점에서, 신라 6부가 각각 단위정치체적 성격을 지니고 있었다는 종래의 시각은 재검토의 필요가 있다. 근자에 신라 6부의 각 부가 일찍부터 주된 직임을 달리하며 사회적 분업을 담당했을 것이라는 견해, 월성 북편에 밀집한 무덤군이 모량부를 제외한 5부인들의 공동묘지일 것이라는 견해 등이 나온 바 있는데, 이를 음미하면, 6부가 일찍부터 공동으로 왕경의 지배자 공동체를 형성했을 가능성이 있다.