RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 空中權의 理論과 그 開發運用에 관한 硏究

        孔大植 漢陽大學校 行政問題硏究所 1985 行政問題論集 Vol.6 No.-

        1. THE MEANING OF AIR AND SUBSURFACE RIGHTS The property rights individual owners hold in land are sometimes visualized as an inverted pyramid which starts at the center of the earth and extends upward through the surface boundaries of the owner's holding to the highest heavens. As this concept suggests, landed property rights can be divided into layers of rights-into air rights, surface rights, and subsurface rights. From a legal standpoint, each of these layers can be held separately form the others and each has its particular characteristics. Up until recent years, the courts of the most of nations have almost universally accepted the principle that surface owners hold all the rights to the column of airspace above their surface holdings. This doctrine has been modified to permit public use of the air for air travel. But it is still recognized that individual owners have a right to all the airspace above their land they can occupy and use. 2. AIR SPACE RIGHTS The right is to inclusive and undisturbed use and control of a designated air space within the perimeter of a started land area and within stated elevations. Such rights may be acquired for the construction of a building above the land or building of another, or for the protection of the light and air of an existing or proposed structure on an adjoining lot. The right exclusive use, control, and quiet enjoyment of air space within stated elevations over a specific parcel of land. 3. AN EXAMPLE OF AIR SPACE RIGHTS UTILIZATION One of the most dramatic examples of air space rights in the Pan Am building in New York City. The penn Central Railrood originally owned the real estate: it utilized the subsurface to run trains on the surface (plus air space just above) for Grand Central Terminal. All of the remaining air space was leased for 99 years to the company that owns the Pan Am office tower. A necessary part of the lease of the air space included “support rights,”consisting columns sunk into the ground on which the air space building rest. 4. INTRODUCTION PROBLEM OF “THE AIR SPACE RIGHTS” TO KOREA Comparing our Korean urban Cities with the cities in European country the effective land-using structures and systems were quite far behind of the later. In order to properly manage the great and complicated tasks concerning an heavy concentration of the masspopulation and the intensive phenomenon of the industrializations, we have to promote a more positive urban renewal development projects. Although urban City renewals is a primarily a public or commercial developer's business, but it is necessary for us to proceed the works mobilizing our energies and techniques under some financial restrictions and hard aspects of public policies. Therefore, the problems on the positive utilizing “Uper Space or Air Space”emerged as the great and the last decision-making catagories in order to maintain and promoting our fair urban living standards and amenities. This thesis written on the basis of such a conceptional cognizance, and has a purpose to introduce the “Air Space Rights”for our land utilizing as well as United States and Japanese practical precedents. The theories on “Air Space Rights”system has been mainly developed in the U.S.A. In order to understand the concepts of that system, we should fully discuss and analyze not only legal and institutional concepts but also economic, social background of this articles. Therefore, in order to promote the urban renewal project in a big cities more efficiently and entirely the urban development with balance and harmony, it is considered to proceed the policy to reform the various difficulties in these days. We must establish the long-term general basic plan of urban renewal projects in major cities including the “Air Space”development and amendment of the Land Public Laws. The land of south Korea is 98,966 km². Compared to this, the population is more than 41 million at the end of 1985. Therefore the density in our country is very high in comparision with other countries, and rapid demand of an effective land uses for factories, urban uses and amusing uses is expected on the industrialization, urbanzation and increases of national incomes. 5. THIS ARTICLE DIVIDED INTO FIVE CHAPTERS AS FOLLOWING Ⅰ. Preface Ⅱ. The “Air Space Rights”and its Development Problems Ⅲ. Meaning of the “Air Space Rights” Ⅳ. Practical Situation of utilization of the “Air Space Rights” Ⅴ. Conclusion.

      • KCI등재

        부동산 저당권 유동화와 평가에 관한 연구

        공대식(孔大植) 한국부동산연구원 1995 부동산연구 Vol.5 No.1

        不動産抵當權流動化를 獨逸을 비롯한 先進 각국에서 이미 定着되고 있으나 우리나라의 경우 그들과는 制度上 相異한 점이 많아 그 制度를 바로 導入 하기에는 해결해야 할 前提條件이 많다. 따라서 抵當權流動化制度를 도입하기 위해서는 우리 民法上의 抵當制度도 이에 맞도록 修止되어야 할 것이다. 즉, 抵當權을 하나의 독립한 價値權으로 確認하여 被擔保債權으로부터 分離하여 流通시킬 수 있어야 한다. 抵當權流動化制度를 도입하면 우리나라 住宅金融供給規模의 總量的 擴大로 長期産業金融 및 住宅金融政策遂行의 效率性과 長期政策金融機關의 경영면에 健全性 確保와 收益性을 제고할 수 있게 되고 일반 국민들에게도 住宅金融受惠가 쉬어지게 되고 機關投資者들에게도 投資受益增大의 機會를 提供하게 될 것이다. 본 論文은 이러한 觀點에서 각국의 抵當權流動化에 관한 立法例를 살펴보고 우리의 社會·經濟的 現實과 관련하여 抵當權流動化의 導入必要性을 강조하고 현행 民法上의 현실과 調和 속에서 立法論을 중심으로 그 方法을 제시해 보았다. 아울러 抵當證券의 評價에 있어서는 抵當持分還元法의 假定例를 들어 간략하게 설명하였다.

      • KCI등재후보
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼