http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : ( Sainz De Baranda P. ) (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Differences Between Winning and Losing Teams in Youth Basketball Games (14-16 Years Old)
( Ortega E. ),( Cardenas D. ),( Sainz De Baranda P. ),( Palao J. M. ) 한국스포츠정책과학원(구 한국스포츠개발원) 2006 International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences Vol.18 No.2
Match analysis is common in performance sport to guide training and competition. However, it is not as common at the youth level. Most studies about match analysis have studied the variables of technique and tactics in relation to final actions of a team`s ball possession. However, a few studies have analyzed participation variables of technique and tactics. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in final and participatory actions of technique and tactics in relation to winning and losing teams, ball possession, and type of attack phase in youth basketball games. The sample consisted of 184 male players from 16 teams with an average age of 15.6 ± 0.2 years. The twenty-four games were analyzed from the men`s under-16 finals of the Championship of Andalusia (Spain). The variables studied were: game result (win or loss), variables related to type of ball possession, and variables related to pattern of play. Two groups of three observers were utilized (one group observed terminal events of each possession and the other observed possession time and pattern of play). The minimum inter-observer correlation was 0.94. The results found significant differences between winning and losing teams in the following variables: winning teams had higher values than losing teams in the following variables: 2-point field goals made, free throws made, dribbling opposed, time of movement, dribble time, use of screens, fast breaks, attack phases from 1-5 seconds, attack phases in which 2 players participated, and attack phases in which 5 players participated. The results showed that the winning teams have patterns of play that use less dribbling, in general, and less dribbling with displacement, in particular; and they used fast attack phases (1-5 s) in which two players participate. Winning patterns of play were those that used either fast breaks or a long attack phase in which all players participated.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
