http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Diplomatic War: Inter-Korean Relations in the 1970s
( Ria Chae ) 서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원 2014 Seoul journal of Korean studies Vol.27 No.2
The period of the 1970s was a turning point in relations between North and South Korea. This was the time of the first peaceful negotiations between the two governments but also the time of one of the worst security crises since the Korean War. Despite the importance of examining this period to understand the dynamics of inter-Korean relations in general and of the effect of Sino-American rapprochement in particular, the relations between North and South Korea in the 1970s have rarely become an object of academic inquiry. The existing studies mostly cover only the period of the early 1970s and are limited in focus to either a particular actor(s) or to certain aspects of foreign relations of the two regimes that they investigate. This analysis demonstrates that the transformation from bilateral dialogue to crisis on the Korean Peninsula in the mid- 1970s developed through the gradual escalation of tensions and was the consequence of both the diplomatic and the military policies pursued by the two regimes. As such, the security crisis was closely connected to the diplomatic competition that the two Koreas engaged in on a global scale, and, particularly, at the United Nations (UN), where the security and legitimacy interests of North and South Korea overlapped and collided. I suggest the concept of a “diplomatic war” to highlight the unique characteristics of inter-Korean relations in the early to mid-1970s―the intensity of the competition and the coordination and interrelatedness between the security and legitimacy agendas of the two regimes.
국가주의 철학의 발생과 세부 이행: 안호상의 철학을 중심으로
박민철 ( Park Min-cheol ),채리아 ( Chae Ria ) 한국철학사상연구회 2021 시대와 철학 Vol.32 No.1
한반도의 국가주의 발생과 세부 이행은 서구와 구분되는 특성을 갖는다. 이를테면 서구의 그것과 다른 한반도 국가주의의 독특성은 특정 상대에 대한 극한의 적대감을 자기재생산의 메커니즘으로 삼고 있는 ‘분단국가주의’라는 현재 모습이다. 이러한 한반도 국가주의의 발생과 이행을 대표하는 인물이 바로 안호상이다. 안호상의 사유는 반동적인 국가주의 철학에 가까웠다. 그는 개인보다 전체로서 국가를 앞세우는 이데올로기와 세부 논리 구상에 자신의 철학함을 집중시켰다. 여기서 강조되고 주입되었던 것은 식민주의적 전체주의, 가족주의, 반공주의 등의 가치지향들이었다. 본 연구는 이러한 점에 주목하면서 안호상의 철학적 기획이 초창기인 일제강점기에는 ‘전체’를 강조하는 식민주의적 전체주의와 전체주의적 국가주의로부터 출발하였으며, 나아가 해방 이후에는 ‘독재’를 정당화하는 가족주의적인 국가관으로 이행했음을 사상사적으로 추적하였다. 나아가 한국전쟁 이후에 안호상의 철학은 마침내 반공주의적 국가주의로 수렴되면서 한반도 국가주의의 현재 모습을 완성하였음을 비판적으로 고찰하였다. 마지막으로 본 연구는 안호상 철학과 대비될 수 있는 혁명적 ‘탈식민주의 철학’의 발굴 및 이와 연관된 연구를 제안하였다. The occurrence and detailed development of nationalism on the Korean Peninsula are different from those of the West. For example, the distinctive characteristic of Korean nationalism is shown in the present “divided nationalism,” which uses extreme hostility toward a specific target as a mechanism of self-reproduction. The person who comes across at this point is An Ho-sang. His thoughts were close to reactionary nationalistic philosophy. He concentrated his philosophy on the ideology and detailed logic that put the state as a whole before the individual, which emphasized and implanted value orientations such as colonial totalitarianism, familialism, and anti-communism. Against the backdrop, this study traced An’s philosophical planning from the viewpoint of the history of thought and confirmed that it had started with colonial totalitarianism and totalitarian nationalism that emphasized “the whole” during the Japanese occupation period and then developed into a familialistic view of state that justified “dictatorship” after liberation. Furthermore, this study critically reviewed that his philosophy had finally converged to anti-communist nationalism after the Korean War, completing the current state of nationalism on the Korean Peninsula. Finally, this study discovered revolutionary “post-colonial philosophy” that could be contrasted with An’s philosophy and proposed related research.