RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재후보

        Regionalism, Alliance, and Domestic Politics: The Benelux Model and Northeast Asian Cooperation

        Kent E. Calder 통일연구원 2006 International journal of korean unification studie Vol.15 No.1

        Most of the literature in International Relations stresses the central role of large states in international affairs. Yet smaller states too can at times play a role more than commensurate with their economic and geo.political scale. This paper explores the potentially important role of smaller states in regional economic integration, explicating the historical role of Benelux in European integration, and extrapolating implications for Northeast Asia. Particular attention is given to the prospectively important role of Korea, and of what the Benelux precedent suggests about what that Korean role in Northeast Asian regional integration processes might prospectively be. The comparative analysis devotes special attention to the incentive structure of key sub.national interests, and to how their aggregation through democratic political processes in turn affects broader regional integration prospects. Most of the literature in International Relations stresses the central role of large states in international affairs. Yet smaller states too can at times play a role more than commensurate with their economic and geo.political scale. This paper explores the potentially important role of smaller states in regional economic integration, explicating the historical role of Benelux in European integration, and extrapolating implications for Northeast Asia. Particular attention is given to the prospectively important role of Korea, and of what the Benelux precedent suggests about what that Korean role in Northeast Asian regional integration processes might prospectively be. The comparative analysis devotes special attention to the incentive structure of key sub.national interests, and to how their aggregation through democratic political processes in turn affects broader regional integration prospects.

      • SSCISCOPUSKCI등재

        The Outlier Alliance: US-Japan Security Ties in Comparative Perspective

        ( Kent E Calder ) 한국국방연구원 2003 The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis Vol.15 No.2

        This paper examines the US-Japan bilateral security alliance in comparative perspective in an effort to identify distinctive structural features and evolutionary trends. The policy objective is to understand the prospective cohesion of the alliance relationship between these two political/economic powers, which between them generate over 46 percent of global GDP and account for nearly 50 percent of the world`s military expenditure. A comparison is made with the contemporary US-Japan alliance and other security alliances in the Pacific and the rest of the industrialized world. Comparisons are made within three basic dimensions: (A) Patterns of security cooperation; (B) Political-economic linkages within bilateral alliance-related relationships; and (C) Asymmetries in security and economic spheres. The final section of the paper asks: "Why?"-after identifying the underlying causal dynamics that have forged the current US-Japan alliance, it enquires what these imply for that partnership`s future operation. It concludes that future consolidation is likely, with broad geo-political consequences that urgently need further exploration.

      • SSCISCOPUSKCI등재

        70 Years after WW2: The Dynamics of the Northeast Asian Security Environment : Remembering from Afar: The United States and the Seventieth Anniversary of Peace in the Pacific

        ( Kent E. Calder ) 한국국방연구원 2015 The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis Vol.27 No.2

        The United States shares with many Pacific powers both relief that the world returned to peace, after the greatest conflagration in world history, and pride in its role in the subsequent transformation of world affairs. Human rights and human dignity strike a deep chord with Americans. Distinct from Asian nations on whose soil the war was largely fought, however, the United States is more detached, in general, from wartime bitterness, and places priority on forward-looking, multi-tiered institution-building across Northeast Asia. Stable relations of mutual respect among the United States and its two major regional allies, the Republic of Korea and Japan, are a special priority, with broader regional confidence-building also considered important.

      • KCI우수등재
      • KCI등재

        Renaissance of the Rimlands: How Eurasia’s Transformation at Sea Re-Shapes Geopolitics on Land

        Kent E. Calder 고려대학교 일민국제관계연구원 2023 국제관계연구 Vol.28 No.2

        The functional role of Eurasia’s surrounding sea lanes has changed substantially over the past three decades, with broader implications on land for the continent’s role in world affairs. Until recent decades largely a venue for local trading, since the early 1990s the Indian Ocean and surrounding bodies of water have become arenas for intense, large-scale trans-continental commerce, as the economies of the rimlands have expanded. Energy, industrial raw materials, and food products have flowed to Northeast Asia and Europe, balanced by industrial exports. The expansion of commodity trade has much further to go, especially in the South and Southeast Asian rimlands of the Indian Ocean, as both energy and food consumption expand from their still-low per capita base in these heavily populated nations. Three other dimensions of transformation complement the expansion of commodity trade and manufactured exports. Beneath the seas, raw material extraction is rising, even as the information revolution transforms Eurasia’s oceans, through the rapid expansion of undersea fiber-optic cables, and sub-surface military technology advances. Global warming is also making Arctic transport and resource development, long rendered impractical by climate, increasingly feasible. These multiple maritime transformations all have geopolitical implications on land. In the aggregate, the changes benefit China and Russia, rendering their prospective partnership of enhanced global strategic value. The embedded strengths of the industrial democracies, however, remain formidable, especially in the technological realm, leveraged by their market orientation. The changing geopolitics of Eurasia’s waterways thus intensifies challenges to the industrial democracies, increasing the future importance of multilateral collaboration, although whether these marginal changes in capacity will provoke thorough going systemic transformation still remains unlikely.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼