http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김희재(Kim, Hee-Jae),김현숙(Kim, Hyun-Suk) 동북아시아문화학회 2012 동북아 문화연구 Vol.1 No.33
This paper explores the national identity and the attitudes towards immigrants among Korean and Japanese university students(below, KUS, JUS). In order to this research, we used cross-national comparable data from Korea and Japan researched at the institute for social Science Research in PNU. and analyzed by factor analysis, t-test. The results are as follows. First, the national identity was examined by national attachment, national pride, qualification of nation. In the national attachment and the national pride, JUS was generally higher than KUS. And the qualification of nation of KUS divided by two factors, that is, civic and ethnic factor, whereas that of JUS had not divide. But there seemed that KUS had strong civic identity and JUS had strong ethnic identity. Second, the attitudes towards immigrants was examined by social distance, attitudes about multicultural society, perceived threat. In the social distance, KUS were generally similar JUS, but JUS were more acceptable than KUS for international marriage. In the attitudes about multicultural society, KUS were very similar JUS, but KUS recognized positively and JUS recognized negatively. In the perceived threat, KUS concerned than JUS about taking jobs away from immigrants, damage of lineage and culture, and JUS concerned than KUS about increase of social problems related immigrants. In the attitudes of multicultural policy, KUS were more higher than JUS to support foreign school, wheres JUS were higher than KUS to qualify foreigners as voter.
김희재,김현숙 동북아시아문화학회 2012 동북아 문화연구 Vol.1 No.33
<P> This paper explores the national identity and the attitudes towards immigrants among Korean and Japanese university students(below, KUS, JUS). In order to this research, we used cross-national comparable data from Korea and Japan researched at the institute for social Science Research in PNU. and analyzed by factor analysis, t-test. The results are as follows. First, the national identity was examined by national attachment, national pride, qualification of nation. In the national attachment and the national pride, JUS was generally higher than KUS. And the qualification of nation of KUS divided by two factors, that is, civic and ethnic factor, whereas that of JUS had not divide. But there seemed that KUS had strong civic identity and JUS had strong ethnic identity. Second, the attitudes towards immigrants was examined by social distance, attitudes about multicultural society, perceived threat. In the social distance, KUS were generally similar JUS, but JUS were more acceptable than KUS for international marriage. In the attitudes about multicultural society, KUS were very similar JUS, but KUS recognized positively and JUS recognized negatively. In the perceived threat, KUS concerned than JUS about taking jobs away from immigrants, damage of lineage and culture, and JUS concerned than KUS about increase of social problems related immigrants. In the attitudes of multicultural policy, KUS were more higher than JUS to support foreign school, wheres JUS were higher than KUS to qualify foreigners as voter.</P>
대구와 경북 지역 청소년의 국민정체성과 다문화수용성 비교 연구
백승대(Baek, Seung-Dae),안태준(An, Tae-Jun) 한국지역사회학회 2013 지역사회연구 Vol.21 No.3
This study analyzed the national identity and multicultural receptivity for Daegu"s and Gyeongbuk"s adolescents(below, DA and GA), focusing on the differences between DA and GA. We used cross-regional survey data from Daegu and Gyeongbuk regions. The collected data were analyzed by the factor analysis and t-test. The results are as follows. First, the national identity was examined from the points of such view as the qualification of nationhood, national attachment and national pride. In the qualification of nationhood, DA and GA are the same. Both DA and GA had strong civic identity. DA was generally higher than GA in national attachment and national pride. Second, the multicultural receptivity was examined from such three aspects as the attitude about multicultural society, perceived threats and the opinions on multicultural policies. In the attitude about multicultural society, there were significant differences between DA and GA; DA showed more negative attitude than GA. In perceived threats, GA are more concerned than DA. However, there were no significant differences between DA and GA in their opinions on multicultural policies.