Cause Analysis and Countermeasures for Industrial CRISIS in Three Northeastern Provinces of CHINA

Kang Ho-gu,Monthinee Teeramungcalanon J-INSTITUTE 2017 International Journal of Crisis & Safety Vol.2 No.1

Recently, as the Chinese economy has focused on the decline in economic growth rate, economic restructuring, and assimilation of demand stimulus policies, the burden of maintaining the growth rate of the Chinese economy is increasing. Previously, the three northeastern provinces of CHINA once led the growth due to the rich the nat-ural resources and the Chinese government s policy support, but, after the reform and opening up, the three northeastern provinces have been falling rapidly in the comparative advantage or the share of GDP and stagnat-ing in comparison with other regions. In particular, after CHINA entered the New Normal in 2014, the Chinese government implemented supply-side reforms completely, and put the focus of this reform on overcapacity of heavy industry and reform of state-owned enterprises. As a result, the economic growth of the three northeastern provinces, where heavy industries and state-owned enterprises accounted for a large portion of the economy, has been falling, and this trend is becoming more serious. Based on the economic situation of the three northeastern provinces in 2016, this report analyzes the three aspects of industrial structure, corporate governance structure, and elemental resources, and chooses the three major causes of the economic CRISIS in the three northeastern provinces. First, there is a single industrial struc-ture. Among the regional GDP, heavy industries, that is, the resource-intensive industries, account for a large portion of industry, and the development of technology-intensive industries is far behind. Second, the proportion of state-owned enterprises is very high. In other words, the structural problem of a company directly affects production efficiency. Third, the outflow of human resources is very serious. Due to various problems such as low-level industrial structure, lack of policy support, lack of enterprise innovation environment, etc. of the three north-eastern provinces, high-quality human resources have escaped to other cities to find a better opportunity, which has hampered the development of high-tech industries in the region and further slowed down the advanced industrial structure. The analysis concludes that the three northeastern provinces should undergo fundamental reforms in terms of industrial structure and corporate governance structure, under the background of the strengthening of CHI-NA s supply-side reforms. First, in the aspect of industrial structure, the industrial structure should be diversified and the industrial structure should be upgraded. And, through improving the corporate governance structure, the efficiency of the local economy should be improved by converting the less efficient state economy into a more efficient private economy. It is necessary to establish local preference policies that can attract core human re-sources while solving the problems of industrial structure and corporate governance structure.

韩国企业对中国东北三省直接投资研究

李?花(Li Lian-hua) 한국국제회계학회 2007 국제회계연구 Vol.0 No.18

The three northeastern provinces of China include Heilongjiang, Jilin and Liaoning province. The total land area is 8.2% of the whole country; the population is 8.4% of the whole country. In 2006, the GDP amount of the three northeastern provinces is 9.4% of the whole country, increasing 13.6% averagely. The increasing velocity is higher than the whole country velocity which is 10.7%. Although the three northeastern provinces of China were the main heavy-industry bases of China during China was founded early and did a great deal of contribution to the Chinese economy, the economy of the three northeastern provinces developed slowly, reform was backwater, opening degree was low after reform and opening began. At the same time, the northeast area lagged far behind the Yangtze River Delta, the Pearl River Delta, the peripheral zone of Bohai Sea and other regions in attracting and utilizing foreign capital. Therefore, the Chinese government puts forward the strategy on revitalizing the northeast old industrial base in 2003, starting pushing forward construction of the northeast economy strongly. As a national policy, the strategy on revitalizing the northeast old industrial base provides new opportunity for expanding opening and attracting foreign capital. Korea is one of the main objects that northeast area attracts foreign capital according to the factors of geography position, resources etc. Korean enterprises' investment to northeast area has a further declining trend in recent years, which is caused by the factors such as the low degree of marketization and limited market capacity of the three northeastern provinces, as well as the strategic changes from cost-orientation to market-orientation made by Korean enterprises concerning their direct investment in China. The author thinks that Korean enterprises should conquer above reasons and exploit the opportunity that the Chinese government revitalizes the northeast old industrial base. Especially, they should invest the industries which have obvious comparative advantage, such as automobile manufacture, raw material, deep processing of agricultural products, and cross-boarder tourism etc. The investment is a kind of strategic choice of double victories no matter to Korean enterprises or revitalizing and development of the northeast economy.

중국지역의 물류효율성 정태적⋅동태적 변화분석 -동북3성을 중심으로-

고정오 한중사회과학학회 2021 한중사회과학연구 Vol.19 No.2

The purpose of this study is to analyze static and dynamic efficiency of the logistics efficiency of the 3 Northeast Provinces of China, based on the DEA(CRS, VRS) and DEA Window model over 9 years(2012-2020). In the analysis of the efficiency, the transportation distance, the number of employees working environments of shipping, rail and road, and the new fixed assets investment in of logistics industry were used as an input variables, while output variables included the amount of traffic in shipping, rail and road. The empirical results show the following findings. First, static efficiency results indicated that Liaoning, Jilin and Heilongjiang regions are inefficiency of logistics in 2019. Especially, these(jilin, heirongjiang) regions were scored below average VRS efficiency in China. Second, the research reveals that beginning in 2012, logistics efficiency of 3 Northeast Provinces of China have a tendency to improve between 2012 and 2019, as based on dynamic efficiency analysis. However, these regions show that the efficiency level was generally lower than the other areas. Third, it was analyzed that the three northeastern provinces had many things to improve due to their low logistics efficiency. Therefore, it is necessary to sign partnerships in the logistics market through joint cooperation, not competition with the three northeastern regions, and seek cooperation in various fields. 본 연구의 목적은 DEA(CRS, VRS)와 DEA/WINDOW를 이용하여 2012년부터 2020년까지 중국 동북3성의 물류효율성을 정태적, 동태적으로 분석하는 것이다. 이를 위해 투입변수로는 운송거리, 철도-도로-해운종사자 수, 물류산업 고정자산 신규투자액을, 산출변수로는 철도, 도로, 해운과 같은 물류 수단별 운송량의 총계를 이용하였다. 연구결과, 첫째 정태적 효율성 분석결과, 2020년(2019년기준) 요녕, 길림 그리고 흑룡강의 물류효율성은 모두 비효율적인 것으로 나타났으며, 특히 VRS 기준 하에서 길림과 흑룡강 지역의 효율성은 전국 평균 미만으로 나타났다. 둘째, 동태적 효율성 분석결과, 2012년부터 2019년까지 동북3성 지역은 지속적으로 효율성이 다소 개선되는 경향을 보이고는 있으나, 여전히 타 지역에 비해 효율성 수준이 전반적으로 낮은 경향을 보이는 것으로 분석되었다.

중국 東北3省지역의 농업여건과 薯類作物 생산 현황

金崇烈,金正幹 북방농업연구소 2016 北方農業硏究 Vol.39 No.1

Approximate situation of potato industry was investigated for three northeastern provinces(Heilongjian, Jilin and Liaoning) in China. Chinese agricultural statistics for potato crops include potato and sweet potato. The acreage and production for only potato appears to cover approximately 60%. According to agricultural statistics of Jilin province, the acreage for only potato is estimated to be 91%(67,000ha) of total potato crops acreage of 74,000ha. In the ratio of only potato acreage compared to total potato one, Heilongjian province is the highest and the lowest result was observed in Liaoning province. The acreage, production and yield of potato have consistent increased since 1990 in China. The acreage of potato increased from 2,829 thousands hectare in 1990 to 5,647 thousands hectare in 2014. Yield per hectare increase from 2,264kg in 1990 to 3,405kg in 2014. In conclusion, total potato production increased rapidly from 6,404 thousands metric tons to 19,227 thousands metric tons. Potato crops acreage and production of three northeastern provinces were 3.7% (328 thousands hectare) and 6.5%(2,171 tons) of acreage and production of China respectively. This result was higher than overall average of China, that is 3.3% for Heilongjian, 1.7% for Jilin and 1.5% for Liaoning. The main cities for production of potato crops in northeastern provinces of China is Qiqihar for Heilongjian, Changchun for Jilin and Tieling for Liaoning.

균형발전정책 추진에 따른 중국 동북3성과 한국의 경제협력 강화방안

송용호(SONG Yong Ho) 신아시아연구소(구 신아세아질서연구회) 2013 신아세아 Vol.20 No.1

중국 정부는 “12.5규획”시기부터 국부(國富)를 위한 경제성장 보다는 민부(民富)를 위한 경제발전을 중시하는 ‘균형발전’을 중점 정책으로 채택하게 되었다. 이에 따라 동북3성의 각 지방 정부들도 발전방식의 전환과 내수시장의 확대를 핵심목표로 적극적인 경제개발 전략을 수립하여 추진하고 있다. 따라서 향후 중국 정부의 균형발전정책에 부응하고 한ㆍ중 경제협력의 질적 향상을 위해 동북3성 각 정부의 지역개발 사업에 적극 협력하면서 효율적 산업협력과 내수시장 마케팅을 강화하는 전략의 수립이 반드시 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 중국의 균형발전정책 실시라는 새로운 환경변화에 순응하는 한국과 중국 동북3성의 경제협력의 방안으로 내수시장 접근성 제고를 위한 전략적 마케팅의 강화, 기술무역의 활성화, 동북3성 지역개발사업에 적극 참여, 투자의 지역, 업종, 방식, 규모의 다양화, 동북3성을 경유한 북한과의 경제교류 확대, 중국 동북3성 기업의 대한국 투자 유도 및 경영컨설팅 실시, 종합적 인재양성 시스템의 운영과 활성화 등의 방안을 제시하였다. From the 12th Five-Year Plan period, the Chinese government determined to reform the economic development policies gradually from emphasizing on the economic growth of the ''wealthy nation" to emphasizing on achieving balanced development of "rich people"(balance and allocation). The local governments of the three northeastern provinces have established and actively promoted the economic development strategies of changing development patterns and expanding domestic demands. To adapt to the Chinese government's balanced development policies and comprehensively improve South Korea and China's economic cooperation. it is necessary to actively participate in the regional development strategies advocated by the Chinese northeastern provinces' governments and to establish the efficient industrial collaboration and strengthened domestic demands marketing strategies. To conform to the environmental changes brought by the implementation of the balanced development strategy, this paper proposes the following countermeasure to strengthen South Korea and northeast China's economic cooperation. including : (1) Strengthen the strategic marketing to improve the proximity of domestic market; (2) Activate the technology trade; (3) Actively participate in the three northeastern provinces' regional development strategies; (4) Diversify investment area. field, form and scale; (5) Expand economic cooperation with North Korea through the Chinese northeastern regions; (6) Actively introduce Northeastern Chinese enterprises to invest in Korean investment and activate enterprise management consulting activities; and (7) Establish and operate a comprehensive personnel training system.

중국 동북지역 사회관리 정책에서 나타나는 당·정 주도성

백승욱 ( Baek Seung-wook ),김판수 ( Kim Pan-su ),정규식 ( Jeong Kyu-sik ) 현대중국학회 2017 現代中國硏究 Vol.19 No.2

동북지역 사회조직이 사회관리에 대한 참여에서 주로 채택하는 것은 ‘합작모델’이다. 동북지역의 사회관리 정책이 사구차원에서 수행되면서 나타나는 주요한 특징은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 사회조직에 의한 서비스구매가 형식적으로 이루어지더라도 경쟁력 있는 사회조직들이 거의 없기 때문에, 구매는 경쟁적 입찰이라기보다 수의계약에 가까운 방식으로 특정 사회조직에 혜택을 집중시킨다. 둘째, 사회조직의 저발전 때문에 지방정부와 지방정부의 후원을 받는 반(半)-관 사회조직 사이의 긴밀한 협조관계가 수립되기 쉽다. 셋째, 단위체제의 역할은 약화되었지만, 동북지역의 사회관리와 사회조직 운영의 배경에는 여전히 단위체제의 특성이 온존하고 있다. 넷째, 위에서 아래로의 관리가 실질적으로 강조되다 보니, 현실적으로 남는 것은 격자망화에 기반한 통제에 집중되는 경향이 있다. Northeastern Provinces in China are catching up with ‘advanced models’ of social management(or social governance) in Southern Provinces. In Northeastern provinces, one of the most prominent characteristics of social government policies is witnessed in their cooperative model. Northeastern provinces display their important characteristics in social management policies as follows: 1) owing to few independent social organizations, targeted model social organizations are easily selected as suppliers for social services; 2) semi-governmental organizations are established as official ‘NGOs’ suit for government standard; 3) continuing legacy of work unit system is still found in these area; 4) ‘Grid management’ technic is widely introduced to control the society.

중국 동북진흥계획이 한국에 미치는 영향: 창지투개발계획을 중심으로

김주삼 ( Joo Sam Kim ) 조선대학교 동북아연구소(구 통일문제연구소) 2010 동북아연구 Vol.25 No.1

2009년말 기준으로 중국의 수출규모는 세계 1위로 올라선 데 이어 올해 상반기에는 중국의 GDP가 세계 2위를 차지하게 되면서 중국은 이제 세계에서 미국과 G2의 위치와 역할을 차지하게 되었다. 중국은 1978년 덩샤오핑이 표방한 개혁개방노선을 추진한 지 30년을 지나오면서 연해지역개발에 성공한 데 이어, 최근에는 그동안 낙후지역이었던 동북3성지역개발에 박차를 가하고 있다. 2009년 11월 18일 중국 국무원은 두만강유역개발개방선도구: 창-지-투를 중심으로(이하 ``창지투개발계획``)을 중앙정부차원에서 국가전략사업으로 선정하고 비준하였다. 창지투개발계획은 1차적으로 중국 동북지역의 개발사업의 성격임에도 불구하고, 국내적 성격을 벗어나 주변국인 북한, 러시아, 몽골, 한국, 일본과 직접적으로 연결될 수 밖에 없는 국제적 성격을 동시에 갖고 있다는 점에서 매우 복잡하고 예민한 개발계획이라고 분석된다. 하지만 중·북·러는 창지투의 핵심국가로 분류되며, 한·몽·일은 창지투개발계획에 있어서 배후국가들이라고 그 성격을 규정할 수 있다. 중국동북진흥계획은 1992년에 유엔의 UNDP가 두만강유역공동개발계획을 제안하였으나, 관련국들의 참여와 투자유치 부진 및 국제적 문제로 별다른 성과를 거두지 못하였다. 따라서 이러한 과거사례에 비추어 볼 때, 창지투개발계획은 향후 성공여부와 국내외에 미치는 영향력 및 그 파급효과는 어느 정도가 될 것인가는 매우 중요한 관심사안일 수밖에 없다. 창지투개발계획에 대해서 한국은 향후 어떠한 대책을 강구해 나가야 할 것인가는 매우 중요한 의제가 될 것이다. In late 2009, China`s exports were ranked as first in the world and in the first half of this year, its GDP was ranked second in the world. Therefore, China has achieved the position and role of G2 just behing the United States. As China has successfully developed its coastal waters for 30 years since its Economic Reform in the People`s Republic of China, led by Deng Xiaoping, that started in 1978, it has spurred development of the three northeastern Chinese provinces. On November 18, 2009, the government of China designated the Changchun-Jilin-Tumen Development Plan as a national strategic project and ratified it. Analysis of the plan shows that it is very complicated and sensitive in that it cannot help but be related with North Korea, Russia, Mongolia, South Korea, and Japan although its focus is on the northeast provinces of China. However, China, North Korea and Russia are classified as central nations to the development plan, and South Korea, Mongolia, and Japan are included to a lesser extent. The United Nations Development Programme suggested a joint development plan for the Tumen River Basin in 1992, but no special results have been achieved due to international problems such as the poor participation of relevant nations and low investment. Therefore, in considering the past case, the Changchun-Jilin-Tumen Development Plan is very important in respect to its future success and its influence on national and international conditions. What measures South Korea should take in respect to the development plan of China will be a very important issue.

조선족, 탈북자 그리고 한중관계

정천구(Chun-koo Jeong) 한국통일전략학회 2006 통일전략 Vol.6 No.1

본 연구는 한중관계에서 주요 외교쟁점이 되어 온 중국조선족 문제와 탈북자문제를 한중 양국의 기본입장의 차이와 쟁점을 탐구하고 한국의 민족정책의 관점에서 문제점과 과제를 제시하고 있다. 재중한인으로서 조선족은 민족의 다양성을 인정하는 바탕위에서 하나의 중화민족을 추구하는 중국의 소수민족 정책 아래서 민족은 조선족이지만 국적은 중화인민공화국의 공민으로서의 정체성을 견지하고 있다. 한국은 한중 수교 후 문민정부의 신 교포정책을 거쳐 국민의 정부의 재외동포법 제정으로 재미, 재일한인과 더불어 조선족을 새로운 한국민족정책의 적용대상으로 포함시키려 시도하였다. 그러나 이러한 시도는 중국의 반대와 우리정부의 실무적 편의주의로 실패하였고 조선족을 재외동포법의 적용대상에서 배제시킴으로써 조선족 정책에 많은 문제점을 제기하였다. 북한의 기근과 정치적 압제로 인하여 발생한 탈북자는 주로 중국의 동북3성에 10만 명 이상이 거주하면서 어느 나라의 법적 보호도 받지 못하고 극심한 인권사각지대에 살고 있다. 중국은 북한과의 협정에 따라 이들을 불법월경자로 체포, 북한으로 송환하고 있다. 대한민국의 법체계로 볼 때 이들은 탈북과 동시에 정지되었던 대한민국 국민으로서의 자격이 회복되어 대한민국은 이들을 보호할 의무가 있다. 한국은 탈북자를 난민으로 보고 이들의 강제송환에 대하여 중국에 항의하고 이들의 보호를 위해 노력해 왔다. 중국은 이 문제가 국제적 이슈가 되는 것을 방지할 목적으로 문제가 발생하면 신속하게 추방하여 한국행을 돕고 있으나 이들을 불법월경자로 보는 기본 입장은 변하지 않고 있다. 조선족과 탈북자 문제의 효과적인 해결을 위해서는 먼저 재외동포를 한민족네트워크에 포용할 수 있는 확고한 민족정책의 수립이 전제되어야 하고 이 문제를 동족의 삶의 질 개선과 인권신장이라는 민족적 목표에서 접근해야 하며 대북포용정책과의 과도한 연계정책을 지양하여 독자적 문제로 취급해야 할 것이다. This study is to analyse major issues on Korean Chinese and North Korean Defectors between Korea and China. I will focus first on the differences of the two countries' basic positions on the issues and then try to discuss ways how to deal with the problems in view of Korea's policy on oversea's Korean Diaspora community. In the China's minority policy, Korean Chinese is one of the fifty five minority nationalities in China, whose identity is Korean as well as Chinese citizen. After long period of neglect, Republic of Korea began to try to include Korean Chinese into the overseas Korean National community enacting an overseas Koreans act. This effort, however, was blocked by China and opposition from working level Korean officials. As a result Korean Chinese are excluded from the benefit of the new overseas Korean Act and it has raised a serious problems to the Korea's policy on the Korean Chinese community in China. More than a hundred of thousands North Korean defectors have been staying in Chinese Northeastern three provinces. They defected from North Korea escaping from hunger and political oppression there. They sustain their lives in a foreign soil with bad human rights conditions without any protection from any national government. China continue to repatriate them to North Korea when its officials capture them as illegal border transgression according to the agreements with the North Korea. In the Korean law system, the North Korean defectors automatically restore their citizenship of the Republic of Korea when they defect from North Korea. So, Korean Government begin to have its duty to protect them as its citizens. Korean government sees the defectors as international refugees, protests to Chinese government whenever the latter repulsory repatriate the defectors and strives to protect them. The Chinese counterpart hasn't change its original position that the North Korean defectors are illegals. Whenever there is a sign that any defector incident turns out to be a serious international human right issue, Chinese government takes a pragmatic decision to expel them quickly to a third country thereby help them to decide their final destination. In order to solve the Korean Chinese issues as well as the North Korean defector issue properly, ROK government should first setup a sound and firm overseas Korean policy which enables overseas Koreans including Korean Chinese in China incorporate into a grand overseas Korean community. It is also advisable that the government approaches the two issues in view of the improvement of quality of life and human rights of our brethren around the world independently from its too inclusive North Korean engagement policy.

지속 가능한 신북방 정책을 위한 중국 동북3성 중심의 해상운송 여건 분석연구

최정환(Junghwan Choi),임상섭(Sangseop Lim) 한국컴퓨터정보학회 2023 韓國컴퓨터情報學會論文誌 Vol.28 No.4

중국의 동북3성(헤이룽장성, 요녕성, 지린성)은 우리나라 신북방정책의 유라시아 복합 물류망 구축을 위한 횡단열차 건설 및 북한과의 무역이 가능한 지역으로, 지리적, 지정학적 및 지경학적 중요성이 크다. 운송학적 관점에서 동북3성은 황해권 국가인 한국-중국-북한 간 해상운송이 가능한 지역이며, 복합운송의 형태로 동북3성을 거쳐 유라시아 및 유럽까지 물품 운송이 가능하다. 본 연구는 신북방정책 연계 중국 동북3성과의 협력 및 우호관계 증진을 통한 물류 거점 지역 확보 필요성을 언급하고자 한다. 특히, 본 연구는 중국 동북3성과의 교역 현황 및 해상물동량을 분석하고, 해상운송 활성화 및 물류거점 확보를 위한 정책적 제언을 하고자 한다. 정책적 제언으로 물류 허브 구축을 위한 항만 공동운영, 항만 인프라 공동건설, 해운사 공동운영을 제안하고자 하며, 문화적 협력 및 콘텐츠 개발을 통한 인적교류 확대로 한국-중국 간의 해상운송여객사업 활성화 방안을 제시하고자 한다. The Chinese three northeastern three provinces - Heilongjiang, Liaoning, and Jilin - hold significant geographical, geopolitical, and commercial importance due to their location allowing for cross-border trade and transportation with North Korea. These provinces are crucial for establishing a complex Eurasian logistics network in line with South Koreas new northern policy. The Chinese three northeastern three provinces, as this region is known, boasts excellent maritime transportation links between South Korea, China, and North Korea, making it an logistics hub for transporting goods to Eurasia and Europe through multimodal transport. This study highlights the importance of securing a logistics hub area by fostering cooperation and friendly relations with Chinas three northeastern three provinces, which are crucial to the success of the New Northern Policy. In particular, the study aims to analyze current status of trade with these region and freight volume transported by ships and recommend political advice for securing logistics hub and revitalizing maritime transport. As the policy suggestion, this study is to establish a logistics hub by implementing joint port operations, constructing port infrastructure jointly, and operating shipping companies together. Additionally, we propose ways to revitalize the maritime passenger transport business between Korea and China, which involves expanding cultural exchanges and developing content.

중국 동북3성 지역 남・북・중 삼각협력 방안-일대일로와 新북방정책 연계를 중심으로-

방성운 대한정치학회 2022 大韓政治學會報 Vol.30 No.1

Just as China promotes cooperation with neighboring countries through the One Belt and One Road Initiative, many countries in Northeast Asia are adopting national development strategies through regional cooperation. South Korea has been promoting the New Northern Policy since 2017 to secure future growth engines, stabilize the situation on the Korean Peninsula, and diversify diplomacy. And Russia is promoting a New Eastern Policy and Mongolia is promoting a The Steppe Road. There is a common point of contact in the policies of the four countries, which is the Three Northeastern Provinces of China. The Three Northeastern Provinces are regions that can be directly linked to regional development in Northeast Asia, including North Korea, and are the largest beneficiaries of peace settlement in Northeast Asia. And are strategic points necessary for the realization of new economic initiatives on the Korean Peninsula promoted by the South Korean government. This study focuses on the Three Northeastern Provinces of China for triangular cooperation between the two Koreas and China. Examine the development strategies and policy directions of the three northeastern provinces and the two Koreas, and discuss feasible cooperation in the Three Northeastern Provinces of China, which are important political and economic hubs. In the realization of the One Belt, One Road strategy and the New Northern Policy, a plan to induce North Korea's realistic participation first is proposed. And Korea and China are also proposing cooperation in areas of interest. 중국이 일대일로를 통해 주변국과 협력을 추진하는 것과 같이 동북아시아 지역의 다수 국가들도 지역협력을 통한 국가 발전 전략을 채택하고 있다. 한국은 미래 성장 동력 확보, 한반도 정세 안정, 외교 다변화를 위해 2017년부터 新북방정책을 추진하고 있고, 러시아는 新동방정책을, 몽골은 초원의 길 정책을 추진 중이다. 네 국가의 정책에서 공통적으로 포함되는 접점지역이 존재하는데 바로 동북 3성 지역이다. 동북3성은 북한을 포함한 동북아 지역의 지역개발과 직접 연계될 수 있는 지역으로 동북아 평화 정착 시 최대 수혜 지역이면서 한국정부가 추진하는 한반도 新경제구상 실현을 위해 필요한 전략적 요충지이다. 본 연구는 남・북・중 삼각협력을 위해 중국의 동북3성 지역에 주목한다. 동북3성과 남북한의 발전전략과 정책 방향을 살펴보고, 정치・경제의 중요 거점지역인 중국 동북3성에서 우선 실현가능한 협력을 논의해 보려고 한다. 그리고 일대일로 전략과 新북방정책의 실현에 있어 선이후난(先易後難)의 전략으로 북한의 현실적 참여를 우선적으로 유도할 수 있는 방안을 제시하고, 한국과 중국 역시 관심을 가지고 있는 분야에서 협력을 제안하는 것이다.