http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
북한 테러지원국 해제 이후 북핵 전망 및 우리의 대응방향
임채홍 원광대학교 2008 圓光軍事論壇 Vol.- No.4
NK's nuclear issue has double-faceted nature, e.g., an international or a regional issue related to nuclear proliferation and a domestic issue to pose security threat to the Korean peninsula. Recently, disablement process as regards the NK's nuclear facilities has resumed soon after the US State Department announced to remove NK from the list of state sponsors of terrorism. But considering a variety of future issues challenging SK & the US, it is merely a signal that the controversial long journey would begin before long. After terminating disablement, NK will try not to implement or to defer its further obligation if possible on the basis of typical salami tactics making use of forced insistence, unreasonable interpretation, blackmail, etc. It is since NK's nuclear program and its possession of nuclear weapons are useful vehicle of the last resort for its regime survival and sustainability. Reviewing the process of the six party talks, it could be said that there was not much solid ties and concerted cooperation among five parties except NK thanks to national security interests of individual country. In this context; SK should bear in mind following response measures in order to achieve NK's denuclearization successfully through the six party talks on the basis of the CVID(comprehensive, verifiable, irreversible dismantlement) principle. First, SK should continue to maintain six party talks having been lasted so far since 2003, and develop it to more substantive negotiations. Second, SK needs to highlight the role of China and Russia to create nuclear weapons-free NK. particularly through China's intensive pressure to NK. Third, SK ought to continue to attach importance to the CVID principle vis-a-vis NK's nuclear program and nuclear weapons involving the UEP(uranium enrichment program). Fifth, SK should strengthen ROK-US allied relations to stabilize possible military tension between the two Koreas, simultaneously cooperating with the next US government to place NK's nuke issue in the priority. Lastly, SK needs to prudently take into account the alternative plan to provide thermal power plants or whatsoever to NK in lieu of the LWR(Light Water Reactor) to block even the least feasibility able to produce plutonium. In conclusion, It would be essential for the five parties except NK to move forward to the same direction so as to establish denuclearized NK, taking advantage of aforementioned various strategic measures, and further to make NK be a responsible state of the international community, at the earliest date, complying with international nonproliferation norms, NPT and IAEA safeguards.
PEMFC의 효율적 시뮬레이션을 위한 Matlab/Simulink와 PSIM기반의 Co-Simulation
임채홍,이우택 국립7개대학공동논문집간행위원회 2005 공업기술연구 Vol.5 No.-
Fuel Cell system is expected to use widely in the near future. Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell(PEMFC) system is broadly investigated due to low operating temperature and fast start up characteristics. To shorten the time and effort putting into development, the simulation procedure is needed, For Simulating Fuel Cell system, specified tools are necessary because Fuel Cell system consists of control system, power generation system and power conversion system. Matlab/Simulink is useful to simulate Fuel Cell's control algorithm and V-I characteristics. PSIM is useful to simulate Fuel Cell system's power conversions. This paper, focuses on Co-Simulation of PEMFC system using Matlab/Sumulink and PSIM. Co-Simulation is an effective method to simulate PEMFC's complicated characteristics.
혁신클러스터(Innovation Cluster)의 연계협력 분석: 경기도 미니테크노파크(MTP) 연계협력사업을 중심으로
임채홍,최승범,홍성만 경인행정학회 2007 한국정책연구 Vol.7 No.1
본 연구에서는 경기도 미니테크노파크 연계협력사업의 중심으로 혁신클러스터의 연계협력의 요소를 규명하고 그 활성화수준을 살펴보았다. 경기도의 혁신클러스터 연계협력 사업은 비록 시작된 지 얼마 되지 않았지만 인식조사결과를 토대로 볼 때, 비교적 연계협력의 활성화 정도는 적정수준이상을 유지하고 있는 것으로 파악되었다. 5대 미니TP별 참여기업의 집적도 또한 모바일 TP를 제외하면 60%이상을 유지하고 있어 특화수준도 비교적 높은 것으로 평가할 수 있다. 그러나 연계협력에의 장애요인도 현실적으로 많이 존재하고 있으며, 사업에 참여하고 있는 기업 중에서 불만족을 나타내는 기업도 있다는 점을 고려할 때 향후 혁신클러스터의 활성화를 제고시키는 방향으로 정책적으로 집중할 필요가 있는 것으로 판단된다.