http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
선박용 Bilge water 처리 장치의 압력용기에 대한 구조 건전성 평가
김은빈,정지호 한국생산제조학회 2024 한국생산제조학회지 Vol.33 No.1
This paper presents the structural integrity evaluation of a pressure vessel for a bilge water treatment device for ships. The device incorporates a nano-micro filter, a cutting-edge technology replacing conventional filters. This filter is expected to reduce the oil content in the bilge water to less than 5 ppm. A stress analysis was conducted by considering the increased back pressure applied to the pressure vessel owing to the implementation of the new filter. The structural integrity of the device, which is crucial for its safe and effective operation, and its performance were evaluated using a numerical analysis based on the ASME code. All the stress classification lines satisfied the criteria specified by the ASME code, ensuring the structural soundness of the pressure vessel. This study contributes significantly to the ongoing global efforts to prevent marine pollution by effectively treating bilge water onboard ships.
김은빈,하충룡 한국무역학회 2019 貿易學會誌 Vol.44 No.6
Under the Manufacturing Liability Act, consumers want to be protected from manufacturers by mitigating burden of proof as an important target to be protected. However, due to the complexity of the product, it is very difficult for consumers to prove defects from the manufacturing defect. This situation has led to a major revision of the Manufacturing Liability Act, which mitigates the burden of proof of consumers by applying fruitless liability. The Manufacturing Liability Act is comparable to the U.S., which has strong consumer rights and is protected by the Manufacturing Liability Act. The burden of proof can be regarded as the most necessary content for consumers within the manufacturing product liability law when responding to manufacturing defects. The U.S. intends to provide implications for achieving consumer protection in Korea's Manufacturing Liability Act by imitating the U.S. based on the burden of proof. Case comparison regarding burden of proof can be conducted based on various criteria, including criteria for each product and key features for determining the importance of the manufacturing product liability law. The Act on the Responsibility of Korean Manufacturing Products for the Protection of Consumers was developed based on the assessment criteria, and a remedy was proposed to protect consumers who suffered from manufacturing defects.
물품계약위반시 합리적인 기간 내의 부적합통지의무에 관한 연구
김은빈 한국중재학회 2022 중재연구 Vol.32 No.4
According to the CISG, there are no special regulations for a reasonable period of time among the obligations to notify the contractual suitability of the goods. As a result, many disputes arise in 'notification within a reasonable period' despite being the most important treaty in practice in defining the obligation to notify nonconformities according to the suitability of goods for each case. Regarding the interpretation of Article 39 of the CISG, various judgments and arbitration decisions are being made in each country for a reasonable period to notify that the goods are not suitable for the contract.There are criticisms that these various views are too harsh on the buyer in the buyer's obligation to notify.It is important to create a unified principle because courts or arbitration agencies of the Contracting States of this Convention interpret in various ways the reasonable period of violation of the contract of goods stipulated in the Convention. Since most of the international commodity trading transactions around the world are regulated by the CISG, it is necessary to analyze and interpret cases in which this Convention is applied in court or arbitral tribunal of each country to derive a unified principle. CISG에 따르면, 물품의 계약적합성의 통지의무 중 합리적인 기간에 있어 특별한 규정을 두고 있지 않다. 그 결과 물품적합성에 따른 부적합 통지의무를 각 사건마다 규정하는 데 있어 실무상 가장 중요한 조약임에도 불구하고 ‘합리적인 기간 내의 통지’에서 많은 분쟁이 발생한다. CISG 제 39조의 해석과 관련하여, 물품이 계약에 부적합하다는 점을 통지할 수 있는 합리적인 기간에 대하여 각 국에서 다양한 판결과 중재결정들이 나오고 있다. 이러한 다양한 견해는 매수인의 의무 중 통지의무에 있어서 매수인에게 지나치게 가혹하다는 비판이 있다. 본 협약 체약국의 법원들이나 중재기관이 협약에 규정된 물품계약위반의 합리적인 기간에 대해 다양하게 해석하고 있기 때문에 이 문제에 대한 통일적인 원리를 만들어 나가는 일이 중요하다. 또한 전 세계의 국제물품매매 거래의 대부분이 CISG에 의하여 규율되고 있으므로 각 국의 법원판결이나 중재판정에서 본 협약이 적용되고 있는 사례를 분석하고 해석하여 통일된 원리를 도출해 낼 필요가 있다.