요골원위부 골절의 부정유합후에 발생한 수지 굴건의 마멸성 파열

김광열,고상훈,김형천,정경칠,강재도,임문섭 대한골절학회 1997 대한골절학회지 Vol.10 No.4

There are a few of reports of delayed rupture of flexor tendon around the wrist and hand by attrition. Only 4 cases of delayed flexor tendon rupture of finger except rupture of flexor pollicis longus after Colles' fracture were reported until now. Several causes of the delayed rupture of the tendon around the wrist and hand were reported by many authors. Colles' fracture is one of the cause of the attritional rupture. But the frequency of the attritional rupture of the flexor tendon was only one-third of the extensor tendons. Furthermore, flexor tendons of the finger were less commonly affected than that of the thumb by their anatomical features. We would like to report a very rare case of delayed rupture of flexor digitorum profundus on 73 year old male patient by attrition on the bony spur which was formed by malunion of distal radial fracture about 10 years ago. They were treated by direct repair for ring finger and free tendon graft with flexor digitorum sublimis of middle finger for little finger. After 1 year follow up, range of motion and flexion power were recovered to nearly normal.

자유기고논문 : "구원의 서정" 논의와 "그리스도와의 연합" 교리

김광열 한국복음주의조직신학회 2003 조직신학연구 Vol.2 No.-

레이저―프리즈마 상호작용 및 수송방정식에 대한 통일된 동적연구

金光烈 한국외국어대학교 1987 한국외국어대학교 논문집 Vol.20 No.1

레이저―프리즈마의 위상경사 폰데로모티브 현상에 대한 고전적 연구

金光烈 한국외국어대학교 1990 한국외국어대학교 논문집 Vol.23 No.1

J. Wesley의 생애와 그의 완전성화 교리(Ⅰ)

김광열 신학지남사 1994 신학지남 Vol.61 No.2

교회부흥과 “총체적” 회개

김광열 개혁신학회 2007 개혁논총 Vol.7 No.-

Recently Korean church has paid attention on "The Revival of Church". Regarding the subject of chruch revival, there has been a common factor in almost every discussions: That is repentance. Today, however, repentance is understood simply as a "talk" business rather than actual "returning" to God's way of life. The biblical point that the true repentance must include both can be more clearly explained by the perspective of "Holistic Gospel", which explains the gospel message from the Kingdom perspective. For example, according to E.P.Clowney, evangelism is to be understood as "Kingdom Evangelism". Thus, we may say that the biblical repentance is to be explained as "holistic repentance". At the beginning of christian life, the believer begins the "holistic repentance". He begins to return to the holy way of living in every realm of his life according to the gospel message. That "returning" is not to be done simply in the area of "talk", but in every aspect of life including spiritual, social, economical realm, etc. And as he tries to live the life of the kingdom of God on earth, he needs to continue to do such a "returning" from his old way of living to new one in Christ. For the real revival of church always goes together with such "holistic" repentance.

전력 퓨우즈

김광열 대한전기협회 1986 대한전기협회지 Vol.- No.119

1923년 일본 관동대지진 시 학살된 한인과 중국인에 대한 사후조치

김광열 동북아역사재단 2015 東北亞歷史論叢 Vol.- No.48

This paper considers the roles which the Japanese state played in the massacres after the Great Kanto Earthquake in 1923, and probes into the truth and the compensation of victims by examining in four ways the post-earthquake management for Koreans and Chinese murdered following the earthquake. Did the state grasp that Koreans had been massacred, and what legal actions were taken against the assailants? What actions did the Japanese Government General, the colonial government in Korea, take after the earthquake with regard to victims? How did the Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea in Shanghai respond to the massacres that occurred after the earthquake? And how did the Chinese government in Beijing cope with the massacre of Chinese after the earthquake? The conditions of the judicial agencies in Japan for the punishment of assailants revealed the absurdly lenient judgment in comparison with the willful murders. The massacre of Koreans after the earthquake were not accidental murders but premeditated crimes perpetrated in public space. Nevertheless, only a few assailants were found guilty, and they received minimal legal punishment. The Japanese colonial government in Korea, as the organization of colonial administration, took charge of self-defense. Through the press packet that the colonial Japanese government sent to the Japanese government in 1924, we can find that it already had chosen 830 Korean victims, and presented condolence money of 200 yen per person, for a total of 166,000 yen. This paper examines the response of the Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea in Shanghai and Korean society in foreign lands through the Dongnip sinmun , a newspaper published by the provisional government in Shanghai. From this, it was found that the Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea received information regarding the massacre of Koreans after the earthquake in many ways. The provisional government and Korean society in Shanghai responded in various ways, for example, sending a written protest to Japan and holding a memorial service for Korean victims and a general meeting to register the protest of Korean society, when they learned of the massacre of many Koreans after the earthquake. This collective protest movement could not be seen in other regions at the time. There were many differences between the response of the Beijing government and the Japanese government toward the massacre of Chinese. In China, the anger of Japanese became excited after October 1923, when many Chinese who witnessed the massacre of Chinese or were wounded by the military, police, and civil militia in Tokyo and Yokohama returned home through Shanghai harbor. As the diplomatic service of the Beijing government demanded compensation and reprimanded the Japanese government for this matter, the Japanese government could not help responding according to diplomatic rules. At that time, as the Chinese had an effective government, there were many differences in post-earthquake management from Koreans who did not have a government. 이 글은 1923년 일본의 관동대지진 시에 학살된 한인과 중국인에 대한 사후조치를 학살가해자의 처벌, 조선총독부, 대한민국임시정부, 중국 베이징 정부의차원에서 각각 검토함으로써, 학살사건에 대한 국가의 역할을 재고하고자 하는 것이다. 일본 사법기관의 학살 가해자들에 대한 처벌 상황을 살펴보면 그들의 고의적인 살인 행위에 대해 결과는 지나치게 관대했다. 관동대지진 시의 한인 학살은 우발적인 살인이 아니라 많은 사람들이 지켜보는 가운데 공공장소에서 무자비하게 살인이 자행된 것이다. 그럼에도 불구하고 최종 판결은 당시의 동정론을 배경으로 극히 소수의 가해자에게 법정 최저의 형량이 내려졌다. 조선총독부는 식민지 통치기관으로서 자기방어적인 사후조치를 취한 것이확인되었다. 총독부가 1924년에 일본 정부로 송부한 홍보용 자료를 통해, 총독부 당국은 이미 한인 사망자 830명을 선정해 1인당 200엔, 총 16만 6,000엔의조위금을 교부한 사실을 확인했다. 상하이에 있던 대한민국임시정부의 기관지 역할을 했던 『독립신문』을 통해 학살사건에 대한 임시정부와 한인 교민단의 대응은 어떠했는지를 검토해보았다. 임시정부는 한인 학살에 관해 여러 방면에서 정보를 얻고 있었던 것이확인된다. 임시정부와 상하이 민단은 관동대지진 중에 다수의 한인들이 학살당했다는 소식을 접하고 대일 항의서를 송부했고, 교민대회와 피살동포 추도회를 개최하는 등 가능한의 의사 표시를 했다. 당시 이 사건에 대해 한인이 집단적으로 항의 행동을 한 것은 다른 지역에서는 볼 수 없었다. 중국인 학살에 관한 중국 베이징 정부의 대응은 한인의 경우와는 많이 달랐다. 1923년 10월부터 도쿄나 요코하마에서 군경 및 자경단에게 중국인들이학살당한 사실을 목도했거나 부상당한 중국인들 다수가 선박 편으로 상하이항을 통해 귀국한 후, 중국 내에 분노한 대일 여론이 고조되었다. 베이징 정부 외교부는 대일 질책과 보상 요구를 했고, 일본 정부는 외교적인 관례에 따라 대응을 하지 않을 수가 없었다. 당시 중국은 국력이 약했지만, 실질적으로 정부가 존재했기 때문에, 중국인 학살 피해에 대해 외교적 노력을 할 수 있었다.

이제 금융인도 새로운 각오가 필요하다

김광열 한국마케팅연구원 1993 마케팅 Vol.27 No.3

아시아태평양전쟁 말기 일본의 군수동원법제 정비와 조선인 동원의 강화-군수지정회사 노무동원 연구의 시론-

김광열,이연식 한일민족문제학회 2022 한일민족문제연구 Vol.42 No.-

This paper studied on the legislation process for national mobilization of the company and laborers, especially focused on Munitions Companies Act(Gunjukaishaho), and its legal operations both in japan and Korea, which led to intensive mobilization of colonial Koreans. The results of studies are as follows. 1. Legislative process - The concept of national mobilization originated from the Munitions Industry Mobilization Law in 1918, which was made after the model of German wartime mobilization system, and was actualized by legislation of National Mobilization Law in 1938 just after the Sino-Japanese War, finally reinforced by the legislation of the Munitions Companies Act in October of 1943, which was made for the reverse the tide in the Pacific war by producing munitions including air fighters in a high speed, which led to more intensive mobilization of women and adolescents as well as japanese men. 2. Logistics mobilization in colonial Korea - The Japanese Government General in korea initiated a logistic mobilization policy in October of 1944, which was similar to Munitions Companies Act in Japan, which was the result of the enormous pressure from the japanese government, munitions corporate group(Zaibatsu), and military powers. This was the very crucial trigger to intensify the nation-wide forced mobilization(Choyo) 3. Influence on korean mobilization - After the introduction of Munitions Companies Act in korea, koreans mobilized into munitions company in north area of korean peninsula and japanese islands increased in a high speed, which brought about under population in south korea. Nevertheless, The Japanese Government General in korea mobilized more koreans including women and adolescents in the name of Jyosei Kinro Teishintai or Kinrohokokutai to fill up the labor shortage in japan. The mobilized koreans were put mainly into japanese munitions companies, which were granted a number of favors for their pains and cooperations. That is the reason why the japanese munitions companies as well as japanese government won’t be free from the responsibility and compensation for mobilized koreans.