http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
여객자동차터미널의 장애물 없는 생활환경 인증 평가에 관한 연구
강병근 ( Byoung-keun Kang ),강태성 ( Tae-sung Kang ),김상운 ( Sang-woon Kim ),이주형 ( Joo-hyung Lee ) 한국의료복지건축학회(구 한국의료복지시설학회) 2016 의료·복지 건축 Vol.22 No.2
Purpose: Caring for weak person in society, which increases the population of the elderly and people with disabilities is essential. By increasing along with the increase of the use of passenger facilities for travelers and pedestrian is increasing the demand for convenient and secure facilities for everyone. The emerging importance of the passenger-related facilities, but a representative study of the bus terminal facilities is lacking. Bus terminals are the most popular passenger facility. Thus, the bus terminal can be conveniently used by anyone in everyday life, however, the applied elements considering the use of the transportation Poor are not sufficient. Methods: This study was conducted to evaluate BF certification standards targeting bus terminals across the country to determine the availability of the transportation Poor in bus terminal. Result: As a result of the bus Terminal possibility BF certified it appeared to be very low. Also, items received the lowest rating of each item was evaluated in the informative facilities and items. Bus terminal is a facility used by the unspecified individuals, the proportion of first-time user is high, but there is a lack of consideration for the transportation Poor bus terminals. Implications: In the future, this study can guide the next research on the application of BF certification standards in bus terminal. Further studies can be presented to the improvement of the BF certification indicator in bus terminal.
시각장애인 점자블록의 현황조사 및 실효성 분석에 관한 연구
강병근(Kang Byoung-Keun),성기창(Seong Ki-Chang),박광재(Park Kwang-Jae),윤영삼(Yun Young-Sam),김은경(Kim Eun-Kyoung) 대한건축학회 2007 대한건축학회논문집 Vol.23 No.11
Although the『The Law Related to Guarantee of Promoting Convenience for Handicapped, Elderly and Pregnant Women』 enacted in 1997 has become effective to install raised blocks which is convenient facility for blind people at sidewalks and buildings, the reality is that there's a serious need of groundwork research such as the analysis of its usage because its actual usage is low, there are many instances of installing wrong convenient facilities that aren't helpful in promoting convenience of disabled and many wasteful factors exist such as the low investment effect compared to expenses. Also, the reality is that the raised block itself made for the blind becomes a hindering factor for non-disabled or other types of handicapped people and its effectiveness hasn't been verified even for blind people. Therefore, we are at a point where its accurate verification and considerations have to be accomplished. Although the raised blocks aren't very effective and suitable for blind people to walk independently in present circumstances for installation, the installation is necessary for few users who are in desperate need while the "the principle of securing safe areas" and "warning-centered installation method" would have to be improved progressively in order to add safety and effectiveness to the installation site and the method.
장애인 자립생활센터의 서비스 프로그램과 공간구성에 관한 연구
강병근(Kang Byoung-Keun),김상운(Kim Sang-Woon),윤영삼(Yun Young-Sam),정은영(Jung Eun-Young) 대한건축학회 2008 대한건축학회논문집 Vol.24 No.9
The purpose of this study is to offer the basic information that will be needed when center for independent living for disabled people are built. In order to make it clear, analysis surveys have been taken, such as space composition, and area distribution. Some other programs form the center that's already operating as a model. The results of the study follow in short form: 1) Support of independent living, experience and education programs has been operating, and they have been doing in limited space by space management mainly. 2) It has been operating without considering systematic construction's design, so there is a quite shortage of space. It turned out that they would need the passage to use a wheelchair, and consider a business room and a toilet. 3) Form what we survey, they would probably need a consultation room and education room, and have to consider a service room for volunteers. 4) They have been designed to function on a small scale, a medium scale and large scale depending on the need, but first of all a small scale example will be provided.
강병근(KANG Pyoungkeun) 대한국제법학회 2015 國際法學會論叢 Vol.60 No.2
최근 한일 양국은 과거사를 둘러싸고 갈등 관계에 있다. 특히 1965년 청구권 및 경제협력 협정의 해석에 대해서 한일양국의 입장이 판이하다. 이러한 차이의 근원은 일제의 한반도 지배에 대한 입장 차이에 있을 것이다. 일본은 미크로네시아와 함께 한국을 일본에서 ‘분리된 지역’으로 여기고 있다. 이들 분리된 지역에 대해서 일본은 한국과 전쟁관계에 있지 않았기에 한국에 대한 전후처리는 경제적 협력과 정치적 타결 방식으로 접근 하였다. 그러면서도 일본은 전후처리와 관련한 모든 문제와 ‘청구권’은 1965년 청구권 및 경제협력 협정에 의하여 ‘법적으로’ 모두 해결되었다는 입장을 고수하고 있다. 한일 양국이 자신들의 문제를 법률적인 면에서 해결했을 지라도 일본 한반도 지배로 인하여 피해를 당한 개인들은 자신들의 피해에 대해서 구제받지 못한 상태이다. 이들 개인의 청구권이 1965년 청구권 및 경제협력 협정으로 모두 해결되었는지에 대해서 한국의 헌법재판소나 대법원은 1965년 청구권 및 경제협력 협정으로 불법행위에 근거한 개인의 청구권이 소멸되지 않았다는 입장이다. 이러한 한국 사법 기관의 판결에 반대하는 견해 중 일부는 1965년 청구권 및 경제협력 협정에 관한 한일 양국의 추후실행을 중요하게 다루고 있다. 조약 해석 수단으로서 추후실행으로 인한 문제는 현재 ILC 의제 중의 하나이다. 현재까지 진행된 ILC의 작업은 1965년 청구권 및 경제협력 협정의 추후실행이 있는지 여부, 있다면 그 내용은 무엇인지에 대해서 많은 도움이 된다. 이에 비추어 보건대, 1965년 청구권 및 경제협력 협정의 청구권에 불법행위에 근거한 손해배상 청구권을 포함시키는 한국 측의 추후실행은 없다. 1965년 청구권의 성격은 재산 및 채권적 청구권, 그리고 한일 양국의 경제협력에 관한 사항을 다루는 조약이기에, 이 조약에서 군대위안부 또는 강제징용으로 인한 손해배상 청구권이 해결되었다고 볼 수 없을 것이 분명하다. Korea is conflict with Japan over the nature of the Japanese colonial subjugation of Korean Peninsula. The positions of Korea and Japan are far apart from each other because they have different approaches to the interpretation of the Agreement on the Settlement of Problem concerning Property an Claims and the Economic Cooperation between the Republic of Korea and Japan, 1965(hereinafter referred to as “The 1965 Agreement”) Japan has categorized Korea and Micronesia as countries which were separated from the metropolitan territory of Japan since 1945. Japan has approached the issues of post-war settlement with Korea from the point of political and economic views, basing itself on the position that Korea had not been at war with Japan. But, Japan contents that all the post-war issues have been completely and finally settled by The 1965 Agreement. Although Korea and Japan may have settled their post-war issues bilaterally, individuals harmed by Japanese colonial subjugation of Korean Peninsula have yet to be remedied. Legally, Korea and Japan are at loggerheads over the dispute whether individual claims have all been settled by The 1965 Agreement. Recently, the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Korea have decided in favour of the positions of the petitioners and the plaintiffs that their claims have not been settled by The 1965 Agreement. Some commentators are very critical about the judgments of the Korean judiciary by arguing that those acts should be addressed in light of subsequent practice as a means of the interpretation of The 1965 Agreement. The International Law Commission(hereinafter referred to as “the ILC”) is now delving into the issue of subsequent practice as an interpretative means of a treaty. It is fair to say the there are no such things to be considered as subsequent practice on the Korean side which satisfy the threshold requirements to be met in light of the discussions of the ILC. Therefore, no claims arising out of sexual slavery or conscription of Korean workers amounting to forced labor may be settled by The 1965 Agreement whose main object is to deal with issues relating to properties and claims, and the economic cooperation between Korea and Japan.