RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    (A) comparative study on the nationality laws of the Republic of Korea and Mongolia with special reference to dual nationality

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14696138

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. Graduate School, 2018

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2018

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • DDC

      340 판사항(22)

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 형태사항

      ii, 298 p. : 삽도 ; 26 cm.

    • 일반주기명

      한국외국어대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
      지도교수: Hae Cheol BYUN          
      참고문헌 : p. 154-163

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 한국외국어대학교 글로벌캠퍼스 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 한국외국어대학교 서울캠퍼스 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Today, after more than two decades of democratic development and openness, Mongolia faces new challenges, on both legal and social fronts. Since the early 1990s, about 130,000 Mongolians - 4,5 percent of the total population of the country emigrated overseas, and more than 40,000 Mongolian citizens gave up their citizenship and have become foreign nationals. The overseas Mongolian population has produced about 4,400 children, 2,000 of whom became foreign nationals, principally because Mongolia’s law does not allow dual nationality. This is a matter of concern, given the relatively small population of Mongolia, and its goals and challenges of economic development. Mongolia needs to address the issue of dual nationality at the legislative level through adjustment of the current single-citizenship legal system. First, the country clearly needs to undertake broad based study at the legislative level on possible modes of recognizing dual nationality to address the current challenge.
    This dissertation examines the concepts of nationality/citizenship in the context of general theory, as well as the grounds of occurrence of dual nationality in practice, based on experiences of dual nationality in the world. In discussing the popular modes of dual nationality, the author investigates the process, of how the phenomenon emerged as one of the trends in the migration of humans and the exchange of knowledge.
    In particular, the dissertation provides a comparative analysis of the characteristics of the nationality laws of the Republic of Korea (ROK) and Mongolia, taking a closer look at issues related to dual nationality, by analyzing it from the perspectives on legal reform, social integration and human rights. On May 4, 2010, the Republic of Korea adopted an amended Nationality Act, recognizing dual nationality on a limited basis. It was a long awaited outcome of the ROK’s economic and social development pattern, its rapid export oriented industrialization, encountered impediments magnified by the Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s. The underlying principles, that guided the ROK in its reform of the nationality concept in the context of recognizing multiple nationality were: (1) the need to raise economic competiveness through attracting foreign talent and foreign investment, (2) use a humanitarian approach based on the principles of human rights, (3) halt the overall decline of the population and the outflow of national talent abroad.
    The work also presents the ROK’s experiences in introducing dual nationality in the context of its efforts to integrate foreign residents, including ethnic Koreans and other foreign workers who came to the country through multiple employment systems and a relaxed immigration regime. The study approaches the issue as a single, yet comprehensive legal and social process, and argues that without broad-based, long term social support, the ROK’s move recognizing multiple nationality may not achieve its goals.
    As these policies were implemented, there was an overall increase of the whole spectrum of foreign residents in the country, including Koreans, either naturalized or re-instated their nationality, ethnic Koreans and foreign workers. This has formed the broadest social base, thanks to which, much of domestic “outstanding talent”, could be retained and be able to join the upper level technological jobs, much needed for country’s economic competitiveness, replacing those talents who remain emigrees due to a variety of reasons.
    The dissertation attempts to investigate a causal connection between dual nationality and the advancement of such universal values and principles as human rights, freedom, non-discrimination, social progress and democracy in general. While demonstrating the increase of dual nationality in the world in recent decades, the study argues that dual nationality does become one of the contributing factors in the shared achievements and prosperity of economies, societies and international cooperation.
    Based on its theoretical and practical findings, as well as the experiences of the ROK’s policies on multiple nationality, the study makes suggestions for the appropriate policy approach for Mongolia, and what specific measures should be taken for the future, in preparation for further steps resulting in recognizing dual nationality. However, it cautions that, regard for the national security dimension of dual nationality is imperative for a country like Mongolia, a small homogenous ethnic nation, sandwiched between giants like China and Russia.
    The study aspires that a range of critical points, raised by the Korean scholars and legal experts, on the current state of implementation of amended legislation on multiple nationality and other supporting social programs in the ROK, that would greatly contribute to Mongolia properly addressing current challenges on the front of dual nationality.
    번역하기

    Today, after more than two decades of democratic development and openness, Mongolia faces new challenges, on both legal and social fronts. Since the early 1990s, about 130,000 Mongolians - 4,5 percent of the total population of the country emigrated o...

    Today, after more than two decades of democratic development and openness, Mongolia faces new challenges, on both legal and social fronts. Since the early 1990s, about 130,000 Mongolians - 4,5 percent of the total population of the country emigrated overseas, and more than 40,000 Mongolian citizens gave up their citizenship and have become foreign nationals. The overseas Mongolian population has produced about 4,400 children, 2,000 of whom became foreign nationals, principally because Mongolia’s law does not allow dual nationality. This is a matter of concern, given the relatively small population of Mongolia, and its goals and challenges of economic development. Mongolia needs to address the issue of dual nationality at the legislative level through adjustment of the current single-citizenship legal system. First, the country clearly needs to undertake broad based study at the legislative level on possible modes of recognizing dual nationality to address the current challenge.
    This dissertation examines the concepts of nationality/citizenship in the context of general theory, as well as the grounds of occurrence of dual nationality in practice, based on experiences of dual nationality in the world. In discussing the popular modes of dual nationality, the author investigates the process, of how the phenomenon emerged as one of the trends in the migration of humans and the exchange of knowledge.
    In particular, the dissertation provides a comparative analysis of the characteristics of the nationality laws of the Republic of Korea (ROK) and Mongolia, taking a closer look at issues related to dual nationality, by analyzing it from the perspectives on legal reform, social integration and human rights. On May 4, 2010, the Republic of Korea adopted an amended Nationality Act, recognizing dual nationality on a limited basis. It was a long awaited outcome of the ROK’s economic and social development pattern, its rapid export oriented industrialization, encountered impediments magnified by the Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s. The underlying principles, that guided the ROK in its reform of the nationality concept in the context of recognizing multiple nationality were: (1) the need to raise economic competiveness through attracting foreign talent and foreign investment, (2) use a humanitarian approach based on the principles of human rights, (3) halt the overall decline of the population and the outflow of national talent abroad.
    The work also presents the ROK’s experiences in introducing dual nationality in the context of its efforts to integrate foreign residents, including ethnic Koreans and other foreign workers who came to the country through multiple employment systems and a relaxed immigration regime. The study approaches the issue as a single, yet comprehensive legal and social process, and argues that without broad-based, long term social support, the ROK’s move recognizing multiple nationality may not achieve its goals.
    As these policies were implemented, there was an overall increase of the whole spectrum of foreign residents in the country, including Koreans, either naturalized or re-instated their nationality, ethnic Koreans and foreign workers. This has formed the broadest social base, thanks to which, much of domestic “outstanding talent”, could be retained and be able to join the upper level technological jobs, much needed for country’s economic competitiveness, replacing those talents who remain emigrees due to a variety of reasons.
    The dissertation attempts to investigate a causal connection between dual nationality and the advancement of such universal values and principles as human rights, freedom, non-discrimination, social progress and democracy in general. While demonstrating the increase of dual nationality in the world in recent decades, the study argues that dual nationality does become one of the contributing factors in the shared achievements and prosperity of economies, societies and international cooperation.
    Based on its theoretical and practical findings, as well as the experiences of the ROK’s policies on multiple nationality, the study makes suggestions for the appropriate policy approach for Mongolia, and what specific measures should be taken for the future, in preparation for further steps resulting in recognizing dual nationality. However, it cautions that, regard for the national security dimension of dual nationality is imperative for a country like Mongolia, a small homogenous ethnic nation, sandwiched between giants like China and Russia.
    The study aspires that a range of critical points, raised by the Korean scholars and legal experts, on the current state of implementation of amended legislation on multiple nationality and other supporting social programs in the ROK, that would greatly contribute to Mongolia properly addressing current challenges on the front of dual nationality.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1
    • 1. Purpose of the Study 1
    • 2. Scope and Methods of the Study 6
    • CHAPTER II. THEORY AND LAW ON NATIONALITY IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA AND IN MONGOLIA 12
    • CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1
    • 1. Purpose of the Study 1
    • 2. Scope and Methods of the Study 6
    • CHAPTER II. THEORY AND LAW ON NATIONALITY IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA AND IN MONGOLIA 12
    • 1. Theory and Concept of Nationality/Citizenship in International Law 12
    • 2. Law on Nationality in the Republic of Korea 18
    • 3. Law on Nationality/Citizenship in Mongolia 27
    • 4. Conclusions 38
    • CHAPTER III. THEORY AND LAW ON DUAL/MULTIPLE NATIONALITY IN THE WORLD AND IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA 43
    • 1. Theory and Concept of Dual Nationality 43
    • 2. Dual Nationality under International Law 48
    • 3. Law and Practice of Dual Nationality in the World 53
    • 3.1. Introduction 53
    • 3.2. The United States and Canada 55
    • 3.3. Western Europe / Germany 58
    • 3.4. Central and Eastern Europe 62
    • 3.5. China and Japan 71
    • 4.The Law and Practice of Multiple Nationality in the Republic of Korea 74
    • 5. Human Rights and Democracy Dimension of Dual Nationality 82
    • 6. Some Critical Issues Regarding Dual/Multiple Nationality in the Republic of Korea 89
    • 7. Conclusions 97
    • CHAPTER IV. THE ISSUE OF THE INTRODUCTION OF DUAL NATIONALITY IN MONGOLIA 103
    • 1. Necessity of Introduction of Dual Nationality in Mongolia 103
    • 2. National Security Dimension of Dual Nationality in Mongolia 105
    • 3. Relevant Legal Issues in Mongolia 111
    • 4. Suggestions for Introduction of Dual Nationality in Mongolia 115
    • CHAPTER V. OTHER LEGAL ISSUES RELATED TO FOREIGNERS INTEGRATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA AND SOME LEGAL IMPLICATIONS FOR MONGOLIA 123
    • 1. Right of Foreigners to Political Participation in the Republic of Korea 123
    • 2. Employment Permit System – EPS for Foreign Workers in the Republic of Korea 130
    • 3. Immigration Policies of the Republic of Korea to Attract Foreign Workers 140
    • 4. Some Legal Implications for Mongolia 143
    • CHAPTER VI. CONCLUSIONS 149
    • BIBLIOGRAPHY 154
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. “다문화 사회와 국적”, 이종수, 한국헌법학회, 헌법학연구 제 6 권제 2 호, 한국헌법학회, , 2010

    2. “이중국적자의 법적문제”, 서철원, 서울국제법연구원, 서울국제법연구 제 11 권 1 호, 서울국제연구원, , 2004

    3. “이중국적의 규범적 평가”, 이철우, 법과사회이론학회, 법과사회 제 27 권,법과사회이론학회, , 2004

    4. “이중국적의 논리와 유형”, 이철우, 법과사회이론학회, 법과 사회 제 25 권, 법과사회이론학회, , 2003

    5. “국적법 어떻게 할 것인가?”, 이형모, 재외동포신문회장 토론문, 한국국회, , 2012

    6. “국적법 어떻게 할 것인가?”, 석동현, 복수국적 관련법 제도의 현황과 과제 발제문, 대 한민국국회, , 2012

    7. “독일 - 프랑스, 이중국적허용”, 박찬규, 한국민족연구원, 민족연구 제 10 권, 한국민족연구원, , 2003

    8. “이중국적의 허용의 법적 문제”, 임지봉, 세계헌법연구 제 14 권 제 3 호, 국제헌법학 회 한국학회, , 2003

    9. 「개정국적법에 대한 비판적 고찰」, 박병도, 건국대학교 법학연구소, 이호문화사, , 2011

    10. 「제 10 차개정국적법의내용및의의」, 차규근, 법률신문, http://www.lawtimes.co.kr, , 2011

    11. “대한민국 국적법의 현황과 문제점”, 최윤철, 건국대학교 법학연구소, 일감법학 제 17 권, 건국대학교법학연구 소, , 2010

    12. 한국과 몽골국적법에 관한 비교법적 연구, 수렝허럴, 광운대학교대학원 법학과, , 2010

    13. 『국제법상의 이중국적의 취급. 이중국적』, 김영석, 사람생각, , 2004

    14. 한-중국적법 비교 연구:이중국적을 중심으로, 최근형, 전남대학교 대학원, 전남대학교대학원 동아시아학협 동과정, , 2014

    15. 『이중국적: 어떻게 보아야 하나. 이중국적』, 정인섭, 사람생각, , 2004

    16. “개편된 이중국적제도에 대한 법리적 고찰”, 이상훈, 한국비교공법학회, 공법학연구 제 12 권 제 3 호, 한 국비교연구소, , 2011

    17. 감사결과보고서,「외국인출입국 등 관리실태」, 감사원, 감사원, , 2015

    18. 『한민족 네트워크 벤치마킹을 위한 화교네트워크의 의의』, 최승현, 전남대학교 세계한상문화연구단, 세계한상화상: 교류협력과 동반성장, , 2007

    19. “복수국적자에 대한 대한민국국적 박탈 규정의 위헌성 연구”, 신옥주, 한국헌법학회, 헌법학연구 제 18 권, 제 2 호 , 한국헌법학회, , 2012

    20. “복수국적 허용의 국적법 개정과 의의”, 홍익법학 제 11 권 제 2 호, 이금로, 홍익대학 교법학연구소, , 2010

    21. “국적법의 세계적 동향과 한국의 현실: 시민권정책지수에 기초하여”, 이철우, 법과사회이론학회, 법과사회 제 46 권, 법과사회이론학회, , 2014

    22. “탈국가주의, 초국가주의, 이중시민권, 그리고 한국의 복수국적 허용에 대한 논의”, 김정규, 대한정치학회, 대한정치학회보제 20 권제 1 호,대한정치학회, , 2012

    23. “중국국적법에 대한 回顧로부터 제한적 이중 국적에 대한 構想: 중국의 인재유 실과 한국의 제한적 복수국적법의 고찰로부터”, 엄해옥, 공법학연구 제 13 권제 1 호, 한국비교공법학회, , 2012

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼