RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    GeoGebra를 활용한 귀납활동이 초등수학영재의 증명능력 및 증명학습태도에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of Inductive A ctivities U sing GeoGebra on the Proof A bilities and A ttitudes of Mathematically Gifted Elementary Students

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99801440

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study was expected to yield the meaningful conclusions from the experimental group who took lessons based on inductive activities using GeoGebra at the beginning of proof learning and the comparison one who took traditional expository lessons based on deductive activities. The purpose of this study is to give some helpful suggestions for teaching proof to mathematically gifted elementary students. To attain the purpose, two research questions are established as follows. 1. Is there a significant difference in proof abilities between the experimental group who took inductive lessons using GeoGebra and comparison one who took traditional expository lessons? 2. Is there a significant difference in proof attitudes between the experimental group who took inductive lessons using GeoGebra and comparison one who took traditional expository lessons? To solve the above two research questions, they were divided into two groups, an experimental group of 10 students and a comparison group of 10 students, considering the results of gift and aptitude test, and the computer literacy among 20 elementary students that took lessons at some education institute for the gifted students located in K province after being selected in the mathematics. Special lesson based on the researcher`s own lesson plan was treated to the experimental group while explanation-centered class based on the usual 8th grader`s textbook was put into the comparison one. Four kinds of tests were used such as previous proof ability test, previous proof attitude test, subsequent proof ability test, and subsequent proof attitude test. One questionnaire survey was used only for experimental group. In the case of attitude toward proof test, the score of questions was calculated by 5-point Likert scale, and in the case of proof ability test was calculated by proper rating standard. The analysis of materials were performed with t-test using the SPSS V.18 statistical program. The following results have been drawn. First, experimental group who took proof lessons of inductive activities using GeoGebra as precedent activity before proving had better achievement in proof ability than the comparison group who took traditional proof lessons. Second, experimental group who took proof lessons of inductive activities using GeoGebra as precedent activity before proving had better achievement in the belief and attitude toward proof than the comparison group who took traditional proof lessons. Third, the survey about ``the effect of inductive activities using GeoGebra on the proof`` shows that 100% of the students said that the activities were helpful for proof learning and that 60% of the reasons were ``because GeoGebra can help verify processes visually``. That means it gives positive effects on proof learning that students research constant character and make proposition by themselves justifying assumption and conclusion by changing figures through the function of estimation and drag in investigative software GeoGebra. In conclusion, this study may provide helpful suggestions in improving geometry education, through leading students to learn positive and active proof, connecting the learning processes such as induction based on activity using GeoGebra, simple deduction from induction(i.e. creating a proposition to distinguish between assumptions and conclusions), and formal deduction(i.e. proving).
    번역하기

    This study was expected to yield the meaningful conclusions from the experimental group who took lessons based on inductive activities using GeoGebra at the beginning of proof learning and the comparison one who took traditional expository lessons bas...

    This study was expected to yield the meaningful conclusions from the experimental group who took lessons based on inductive activities using GeoGebra at the beginning of proof learning and the comparison one who took traditional expository lessons based on deductive activities. The purpose of this study is to give some helpful suggestions for teaching proof to mathematically gifted elementary students. To attain the purpose, two research questions are established as follows. 1. Is there a significant difference in proof abilities between the experimental group who took inductive lessons using GeoGebra and comparison one who took traditional expository lessons? 2. Is there a significant difference in proof attitudes between the experimental group who took inductive lessons using GeoGebra and comparison one who took traditional expository lessons? To solve the above two research questions, they were divided into two groups, an experimental group of 10 students and a comparison group of 10 students, considering the results of gift and aptitude test, and the computer literacy among 20 elementary students that took lessons at some education institute for the gifted students located in K province after being selected in the mathematics. Special lesson based on the researcher`s own lesson plan was treated to the experimental group while explanation-centered class based on the usual 8th grader`s textbook was put into the comparison one. Four kinds of tests were used such as previous proof ability test, previous proof attitude test, subsequent proof ability test, and subsequent proof attitude test. One questionnaire survey was used only for experimental group. In the case of attitude toward proof test, the score of questions was calculated by 5-point Likert scale, and in the case of proof ability test was calculated by proper rating standard. The analysis of materials were performed with t-test using the SPSS V.18 statistical program. The following results have been drawn. First, experimental group who took proof lessons of inductive activities using GeoGebra as precedent activity before proving had better achievement in proof ability than the comparison group who took traditional proof lessons. Second, experimental group who took proof lessons of inductive activities using GeoGebra as precedent activity before proving had better achievement in the belief and attitude toward proof than the comparison group who took traditional proof lessons. Third, the survey about ``the effect of inductive activities using GeoGebra on the proof`` shows that 100% of the students said that the activities were helpful for proof learning and that 60% of the reasons were ``because GeoGebra can help verify processes visually``. That means it gives positive effects on proof learning that students research constant character and make proposition by themselves justifying assumption and conclusion by changing figures through the function of estimation and drag in investigative software GeoGebra. In conclusion, this study may provide helpful suggestions in improving geometry education, through leading students to learn positive and active proof, connecting the learning processes such as induction based on activity using GeoGebra, simple deduction from induction(i.e. creating a proposition to distinguish between assumptions and conclusions), and formal deduction(i.e. proving).

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 우정호, "학교 수학의 교육적 기초" 서울대학교 출판부 1998

    2 류성림, "피아제의 균형화 모델에 의한 증명의 지도 방법 탐색" 韓國敎員大學校 大學院 1998

    3 이헌수, "테크놀로지를 활용한 수학 영재교육" 전남대학교 대학원 2011

    4 조완영, "탐구형 기하 소프트웨어를 활용한 중학교 2학년 학생의 증명활동에 관한 사례연구" 한국교원대학교 대학원 2000

    5 권성룡, "초등학생의 수학적 정당화에 관한 연구" 한국수학교육학회 7 (7): 85-99, 2003

    6 김정하, "초등학생의 수학적 정당화에 관한 연구" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2010

    7 송상헌, "초등학교 6학년 수학영재들의 기하 과제 증명 능력에 관한 사례 분석" 대한수학교육학회 16 (16): 327-344, 2006

    8 허지연, "초등 수학 영재들이 보이는 정당화의 유형 사례 분석 : 도형 분할 과제를 중심으로" 경인교육대학교 2006

    9 최경식, "지오지브라와 함께하는 수학탐구1" 퍼플 2012

    10 한혜숙, "증명학습에 대한 학생들의 성향과 GSP를 활용한 증명학습" 한국학교수학회 11 (11): 299-314, 2008

    1 우정호, "학교 수학의 교육적 기초" 서울대학교 출판부 1998

    2 류성림, "피아제의 균형화 모델에 의한 증명의 지도 방법 탐색" 韓國敎員大學校 大學院 1998

    3 이헌수, "테크놀로지를 활용한 수학 영재교육" 전남대학교 대학원 2011

    4 조완영, "탐구형 기하 소프트웨어를 활용한 중학교 2학년 학생의 증명활동에 관한 사례연구" 한국교원대학교 대학원 2000

    5 권성룡, "초등학생의 수학적 정당화에 관한 연구" 한국수학교육학회 7 (7): 85-99, 2003

    6 김정하, "초등학생의 수학적 정당화에 관한 연구" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2010

    7 송상헌, "초등학교 6학년 수학영재들의 기하 과제 증명 능력에 관한 사례 분석" 대한수학교육학회 16 (16): 327-344, 2006

    8 허지연, "초등 수학 영재들이 보이는 정당화의 유형 사례 분석 : 도형 분할 과제를 중심으로" 경인교육대학교 2006

    9 최경식, "지오지브라와 함께하는 수학탐구1" 퍼플 2012

    10 한혜숙, "증명학습에 대한 학생들의 성향과 GSP를 활용한 증명학습" 한국학교수학회 11 (11): 299-314, 2008

    11 박인희, "증명이전의 귀납활동이 증명능력 및 증명학습태도에 미치는 영향 : 중학교 2학년 기하단원에서" 한국교원대학교 교육대학원 2005

    12 류희찬, "증명의 필요성 이해와 탐구형기하 소프트웨어의 활용" 9 (9): 419-438, 1999

    13 나귀수, "증명의 본질과 지도 실제의 분석 : 중학교 기하 단원을 중심으로" 서울大學校 大學院 1998

    14 서동엽, "증명의 구성요소 분석 및 학습지도방향 탐색 : 중학교 수학을 중심으로" 서울대학교 1999

    15 우정호, "증명 지도의 재음미" 4 (4): 3-24, 1994

    16 柳成林, "중학생의 幾何 證明 能力과 誤謬에 대한 연구" 韓國敎員大學校 大學院 1994

    17 김흥기, "중학교 수학에서 증명지도에 관한 연구" 한국수학교육학회 37 (37): 55-72, 1998

    18 장혜진, "중학교 도형수업에서 GeoGebra 활용의 효과에 관한 연구" 국민대학교 2012

    19 이용민, "중학교 기학영역 증명지도에 있어서 분석-종합적 증명 방법에 관한 연구 : 중학교 2학년을 중심으로" 한국교원대학교 교육대학원 2000

    20 박미덕, "중학교 2학년 기하영역 증명지도에 있어서 소집단 협동학습의 효과: 증명능력과 비판적 사고력을 중심으로" 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 2003

    21 신동선, "수학교육과 컴퓨터" 경문사 1999

    22 우정호, "수학 학습-지도 원리와 방법" 서울대학교 출판부 2000

    23 나귀수, "수학 영재 학생들의 발견과 증명에 대한 연구" 대한수학교육학회 21 (21): 105-120, 2011

    24 NCTM, "수학 교육과정과 평가의 새로운 방향" 경문사 1992

    25 NCTM, "수학 교육과정과 평가의 새로운 방향" 경문사 1992

    26 Connel, M. L, "Technology in constructivist mathematics classrooms" 17 (17): 311-338, 1998

    27 Marrades, R, "Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment" 44 : 87-125, 2000

    28 Lee, K. H, "Mathematically gifted students' geometrical reasoning and informal proof" 13 : 241-248, 2005

    29 Simon, M, "Justification in the mathematics classroom : A study of prospective elementary teachers" 15 : 3-31, 1996

    30 Chazan, D, "High school geometry students' justification for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof" 24 : 359-387, 1993

    31 Sriraman, B, "Gifted ninth grader's notion of proof : Investigating parallels in approaches of mathematically gifted students and professional mathematicians" 27 (27): 267-292, 2004

    32 정권철, "GSP를 활용한 도형의 교수-학습자료 연구 : 8학년 도형 단원" 창원대학교 교육대학원 2002

    33 Scher, D, "Folded paper, dynamic geometry and proof : A three-tier approach to the conics" 89 (89): 188-193, 1996

    34 Thompson, D. R, "Assessing reasoning and proof in high school, In Assessment in the mathematics classroom, 1993 Yearbook" NCTM 167-176, 1993

    35 Galindo, E, "Assess in justification and proof in geometry classes taught using dynamic software" 91 (91): 76-81, 1998

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.06 1.06 1.04
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.9 0.85 1.285 0.27
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼