http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 발행기관 : 한국생성문법학회 (검색결과 1,341 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
박소영(Park, So-Young) 한국생성문법학회 2018 생성문법연구 Vol.28 No.2
This paper argues that Korean has genuine clausal comparatives which involve degree operator movement. Kim and Sells (2010) contends that Korean has no clausal comparatives, and that apparent Korean clausal comparatives are in fact phrasal comparatives, which can be analyzed as having relative clause structure (i.e. a relative clause analysis, See Sudo (2015) for a similar analysis of Japanese clausal comparatives.). This paper demonstrates that the relative clause analysis like Kim and Sells (2010) and Sudo (2015) is not sufficient for explaining Korean clausal comparatives. A variety of novel evidence is addressed, coming from the grammaticality of clausal comparatives that must refer to human nouns, the absence of internally-headed relative clauses in comparative context, the availability of singular or plural postpositional phrases combined with pota than , negative island effects, and scope ambiguities. This discussion leads to the conclusion that Korean comparatives allow semantic interpretation of 2-place -er (i.e. degree comparison), along with 3-place -er (i.e. individual comparison) for phrasal comparatives, which, in turn, implies that the parametric variation account suggested by Beck et al. (2004) is too strong for Korean comparatives.
-
-
-
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
