http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
최기용(Choi, Kiyong) 한국생성문법학회 2020 생성문법연구 Vol.30 No.3
It has been observed that there are two variants of sikhi- causatives in Korean: argument adding and argument non-adding. In this squib, we claim that sikhi- in the two variants share the following two properties: (i) they assign a Causer theta-role, and (ii) they require a result event as their complement. This claim is supported by a passive analysis of the argument non-adding variant, for which we present three pieces of evidence. Finally, we present a GB-style implementation of the passive analysis based on Choi (2009, 2017, 2018a, b).
최준수(Tchoe, Joon Soo) 한국생성문법학회 2018 생성문법연구 Vol.28 No.1
This paper explores the derivation of the constructions known as direct passives, indirect (or adverse) passives and causatives in Korean. In the literature, there are two major points generally accepted: 1) Korean has passive and causative morphemes, 2) these morphemes are syntactic functional categories which decides the Voice or Causativity of the construction. But I will provide a different analysis by arguing three points: 1) so-called passive and causative morphemes are not syntactic functional categories. 2) they combine, in a highly unpredictable way, with a predicate in the Lexicon but not in narrow syntactic components. 3) the function of these morphemes is to produce a lexically derived predicate through the modification of the argument structure or through the change of the Ɵ-role assigned to an external argument. In other words, I will put forward the hypothesis that Korean passive and causative predicates are lexically derived and that this language has no syntactic Voice and Causativity distinction. In the passage, we will see, as a by-product, that there is no inchoative construction in Korean.