http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
元弘淵 江陵大學統一問題硏究所 1984 統一問題硏究 Vol.1 No.-
Yul-gok(1536-1584) was one of the figures who were remarkable for philosophy, ethics, education and politics in the Yi dynasty of 16 century. He was a scholar who succeeded to human nature philosophy in Confucianism and made development of its scholastic theory. His basic thought in education and politics is sincerity. It is the way of Heaven in Nature. And it also means the good nature toward rightness in human mature as complex concept of reason, intelligence and conscience. Therefore the aim of his education lies in cultiviation of ethical education which made people exercise a good nature positively. Such an education is to develop a fine character. And besides, it aims at cultivating men of sincerity who contribute greatly to socialization of nation in such a way as to make it morerightous and ethical. So Yul-gok thinks that the aim of politics is to make people rich, that is, to give them good with sincerity. He says that he who is responsible for politics should have fine character and treat his people with sincerity as parents do their own children. So people in the folling generations ofter call him 'governing by philosophers' thinkers. To be short, the close examination of his thought for ethical education reveals that a man of fine character should be responsible for politics and that he denys governmental authority of the sovereign over the people who is short of sincerity even if he has a succession to the throne.
朴喆煥 江陵大學統一問題硏究所 1984 統一問題硏究 Vol.1 No.-
The problem of resources Nationalism is one of the new concept. It has been so specialized and complex that it will necessarily have rules that differ from those on their sectors in the critical survey of the new international Economic Order. Let's see the kernel of Natural resources Nationalism from U.N. Resolution. For forming the concept of nationalism U. N. deligates argued many times by the report on the Natural Resources Permanent Sovereignty. For study of resources nationalism, the implication in international law should be concerned but it will be more efficient to search the scope in the field of economic part which biased the new international economic order. So I would like to consider the resources nationalism as an economic problem. by the name of "Natural resources Permanent Sovereignty." In accordance with that idea, I concentrate upon the subject in detail by tracing the process of Natural Resources Permanent Sovereignty.