RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Modeling undergraduate STEM students’ satisfaction with their programs in China: an empirical study

        Zhuang Tengteng,Cheung Alan C. K.,Tam Winnie 서울대학교 교육연구소 2020 Asia Pacific Education Review Vol.21 No.2

        Several major reform areas attempted by ‘New Engineering Education’ (NEE), China’s most recent engineering education reform initiative at university level, are examined for their direct and indirect impact on Chinese STEM-major students’ satisfaction with their programs in this study. With data collected from a sample of 619 Chinese undergraduate students, the measurement and structural models both display good model fts. The structural results indicate that course satisfaction fully mediates the impact of classroom instruction method on program satisfaction, while partially mediates the impact of support from faculty members and alternative assessment methods on program satisfaction. The impact of resource and service on program satisfaction, however, is direct without any mediating efect in between. Multigroup analyses show that the impact of alternative assessment methods on course satisfaction is signifcantly stronger for frst-tier university students than for non-frst-tier university students. Furthermore, there is stronger impact of resource and service on program satisfaction for junior and senior students than for freshmen and sophomores. Practical implications are discussed.

      • KCI등재

        Developing a synergistic approach to engineering education: China’s national policies on university–industry educational collaboration

        Tengteng Zhuang,Haitao Zhou 서울대학교 교육연구소 2023 Asia Pacific Education Review Vol.24 No.1

        This article examines the intents and effects of China’s national policies to promote a synergistic approach to university–industry collaborative education. These policies set out to reduce the academia-industry disconnection for engineering education. Based on document analysis and interviews with various types of stakeholders, the study reveals that China has strived for a synergistic approach to education by strengthening the main-actor role of enterprises, framing a policy support system, incorporating external stakeholders in universities’ governance structures, and building a coordinated framework for a synergistic approach to education. These policies have enhanced enterprises’ motivation to participate in university education, deepened enterprises’ engagement with engineering education at course level, and created an educational innovation ecosystem. Some challenges remain such as the mismatch between course update and technological development, the mismatch between costs and return for faculty members, and difficulty in assessment of outcomes. Overwhelmingly, China has tried exploring a model conducive to the improvement of higher education quality, and the overlapping triple helix model, compared with the statist or laissez-faire patterns, has a more robust effect in galvanizing stakeholders towards their collective goal in the Chinese context.

      • KCI등재

        “New Engineering Education” in China: a national technological imaginary of the Chinese Dream

        Aaron Koh,Tengteng Zhuang 서울대학교 교육연구소 2021 Asia Pacific Education Review Vol.22 No.1

        This paper examines the “imaginaries” taking place in New Engineering Education (NEE). The NEE is the most recent reform of the engineering education sector in China and is used to interrogate the more encompassing backdrop of the country’s national imaginary, the “Chinese Dream.” Further, this paper analyzes three important policy documents that constitute the blueprint of the NEE. Drawing on Charles Taylor’s concept of the “social imaginary” and using critical discourse analysis, a close analysis of the discursive construction of the technological and national elements in the policy texts is carried out. This combinatory theoretical and analytical framework is used to examine how a normative vision and ideology of the development of engineering education is constructed as taking a “new” direction. In undertaking this policy analysis, this paper demonstrates how a rising power is revolutionizing its engineering education as a resource, coupled with the ideological “social (national) imagination” of the Chinese Dream, to extend its power and geopolitical positioning in a competitive and globalized economy.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼