http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Lee, Sungcheul,Kim, Sitae,In, Woosung,Kim, Moonki,Jeong, Jay I.,Kim, Jongwon Cambridge University Press 2011 Robotica Vol.29 No.4
<B>SUMMARY</B><P>In this paper, an experimental verification of antagonistic stiffness planning is presented for a 2-DOF parallel mechanism with four actuators. With 2-DOF force redundancy, the magnitude and direction of the stiffness enhancement can be controlled by the additional actuators, where the internal torques of the mechanism exist on the two-dimensional null space. In the experiments, the passive and active stiffness are measured, respectively, during endowing the external force at the end-effector. Two stiffness assignment methods for a given pathway are suggested and are verified by the experiments.</P>
Error modeling for sensitivity analysis and calibration of the tri-pyramid parallel robot
Lee, Sungcheul,Zeng, Qiang,Ehmann, Kornel F. Springer-Verlag 2017 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TE Vol.93 No.1
<P>Developments in machine tooling technology are driven by a demand for high-precision machining of various materials. However, high-precision machining using a kinematic model with nominal values is associated with inaccuracy as the machine errors are not accounted for. Therefore, it is important to precisely determine the machine error factors to produce an accurate error model. Complex models that use iterative calculation in the calibration process are time-consuming and resource-intensive. In this paper, a simplified error model was applied to a translational parallel tri-pyramid robot with three degrees of freedom (DOF). The sources of kinematic error were joint errors, kinematic parameter errors, and actuator control errors; 90 errors were identified in total. The full error model was defined using a linearized homogeneous transformation matrix (HTM) and the Denevit-Hartenberg (DH) parameters. The 27 dominant error sources affecting the accuracy of the platform position were selected by a sensitivity analysis method. After the error reduction model based on these sources was established, the calibration was performed by simulation. The calibration simulation results suggest that the model accuracy could be improved from 0.85 to 0.26 mm.</P>