RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • Exploring the Use of Exercise as Punishment in Sport

        Gretchen Kerr,Ashley Stirling,Ellen MacPherson,Jenessa Banwell,Ahad Bandealy,Cassidy Preston 한국코칭능력개발원 2016 International Journal of Coaching Science Vol.10 No.2

        This exploratory study sought to examine the use of exercise as punishment in sport. Despite the existence of numerous policies that condone the use of exercise as punishment in sport and physical education settings, anecdotal evidence suggests it continues to be used as a coaching and teaching practice. To-date, very few studies have studied this phenomenon empirically. The purpose of this exploratory study therefore was to examine athletes’ experiences of the use of exercise as punishment, with a focus on the occurrence, types, precipitants, and perceived consequences of this practice. In the first phase of the study, 12 university-level football players were interviewed about their experiences of exercise as punishment. The findings from phase one, along with existing literature, were used to inform phase two of the study which involved the development and administration of a survey to undergraduate students in a kinesiology/physical education program (n=335) who had experiences in competitive sport. Taken together, the findings indicated that experiences of exercise as punishment are common, are typically administered by the head coach in public training settings as a result of poor athletic performance and behavioural infractions, and are reportedly associated with negative consequences for the athletes. The findings are interpreted to suggest that the coaching practice of administering exercise as punishment is a commonly accepted method of addressing undesirable performances and behaviours. As this study is exploratory in nature, numerous questions for future research remain including further study of coaches’ and athletes’ perspectives on the use of exercise as punishment, and contextual influences that enable the use of these practices. Implications for practice include education for coaches regarding alternative disciplinary strategies.

      • Professionalization of Coaches to Reduce Emotionally Harmful Coaching Practices

        Gretchen A. Kerr,Ashley E. Stirling 한국코칭능력개발원 2015 International Journal of Coaching Science Vol.9 No.1

        While sport participation has been associated with numerous developmental benefits, the sport environment can also be harmful for many young athletes. Previous researchers have reported that harmful, emotionally abusive, coaching practices are experienced by many athletes and that these practices tend to be normalized by coaches, parents, and athletes alike (Kerr & Stirling, 2012; Stirling, 2013). Interestingly, the normalization of emotionally abusive coaching practices shares much in common with the historical acceptance of corporal punishment in schools (Gradinger, 2005). We propose that the process of abolition of corporal punishment from most Westernized schools may inform methods of eradicating emotionally abusive coaching practices from youth sport. Given the advancements made in education through the professionalization of teaching, it may be that the professionalization of coaching would stimulate similar benefits with respect to the quality of sport experiences for young people.

      • An Evaluation of Canada’s National Coaching Certification Program’s Make Ethical Decisions Coach Education Module

        Ashley Stirling,Gretchen Kerr,Lisanne Cruz 한국코칭능력개발원 2012 International Journal of Coaching Science Vol.6 No.2

        The purpose of this study was to evaluate Canada’s National Coaching Certification Program’s Make Ethical Decisions (MED) coach education module. Kirkpatrick and Kirkpatrick’s (2007) model for evaluating training programs was used to frame this study. The study was comprised of two separate phases. In phase one, after completion of the module, 30 coaches participated in a semi-structured interview. The results of this phase of the study indicated that the vast majority of coaches were satisfied with the module and reported that the module impacted their decision-making. Given the recommendations made by the coaches interviewed, namely that the MED module would benefit from the addition of more content information on ethical dilemmas in sport, a second phase of the study was added. In phase two, 3742 coaches completed an on-line questionnaire. The participants identified the types of ethical dilemmas most commonly encountered as well as their desire for further education on these issues in sport. Recommendations are proposed for improving the Make Ethical Decisions module and addressing ethical coaching in general.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼