http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Alan Salmoni (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
An Examination of the Definition and Development of Expert Coaching
Melissa Wiman,Alan W. Salmoni,Craig R. Hall 한국코칭능력개발원 2010 International Journal of Coaching Science Vol.4 No.2
The aim of this paper is twofold: first, to examine how coaching expertise is defined and second, to investigate how this expertise develops over time. This research involved semi-structured interviews with elite athletes and elite coaches and was done in the tradition of grounded theory. Results suggested that there is a need to go beyond identifying a coach as an expert based on the performance of his/her athletes. Some of the additional criteria suggested included: be recognized by peers (other coaches) as experts; be recognized by athletes as experts and have successful athletes/teams at any level of competition. In keeping with the tradition of studying expertise, we suggest that research in coaching expertise would benefit by being more specific.
-
Xianmin Yu,Alan Salmoni 사단법인약침학회 2018 Journal of Acupuncture & Meridian Studies Vol.11 No.5
Objectives To compare between acupuncture and acupressure for preventing menstrual migraine (MM). Methods MM is one kind of migraine associated with menses in female. It is often associated with increased menstrual distress and disability, leading to decreased daily activity and quality of life. A randomized and controlled pilot study was conducted with three groups: verum acupuncture (VA) group, acupressure (AP) group, and control acupuncture (CA) group. The study lasted for 7 cycle-months, with a 1 cycle-month baseline observation (T1), a 3 cycle-month intervention (3 times per cycle-month) (T2–T4), and a 3 cycle-month follow-up (T5–T7). Outcome measures were number of migraine days, average and peak pain, total duration period of MM, and percentage of patients with ≥50% reduction in the number of MM days. Results A total of 18 participants were included in the analysis (VA, n = 7; AP, n = 6; CA, n = 5). Both VA and AP were significantly more effective than CA for reducing MM days during the intervention period. Both VA and AP tended to be more effective than CA for reducing peak pain during the intervention period. No significant differences for the outcomes were observed among VA, AP, and CA during the follow-up period. No serious adverse events were reported. Discussion Results of the pilot study suggest that both VA and AP could be considered as alternative and safe prophylactic interventions for MM. Register ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02592681.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
