RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
        • 작성언어
        • 저자

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI우수등재

        [동남아시아] 경계 넘기와 새로운 시각의 모색

        여운경(Yeo, Woonkyung) 역사학회 2016 역사학보 Vol.0 No.231

        The studies of Southeast Asian history in Korea in 2012-2015 have achieved ‘development’ in scholarship, responding to new theories and approaches in the field of (Southeast) Asian studies and other disciplines. While producing in-depth research on political and legal changes in premodern Southeast Asian societies, scholars of Southeast Asian history also sought to find answers to contemporary scholarly trends in the field, such as search for more interdisciplinary approaches, growing interest in more contemporary histories and more diverse topics, the critiquing of the idea and power of nation and nationalism, and quest for more international and transnational perspectives in interpreting Southeast Asian history. These new trends were encouraged by the interdisciplinary Southeast Asian studies initiated by the Humanities Korea Project and the participation of scholars outside the field of Southeast Asian history. Such an approach helped scholars study it as an integrated area rather than a collection of individual states. The rise of “New” Cold War history also contributed to the growth of studies on contemporary Southeast Asia based on transnational perspectives. As such, during the last four years the field of Southeast Asian history has communicated with diverse voices of scholars of other regions and disciplines in and outside Korea, and paved the way for a more integrated yet multidimensional study of Southeast Asian history.

      • KCI등재

        1950-60년대 인도네시아의 정치 변화와 수카르노의 “혁명”

        呂運京(Woonkyung Yeo) 동양사학회 2017 東洋史學硏究 Vol.139 No.-

        In the mid-1950s, Indonesian society suffered from political conflicts and economic downfall in the context of regional rebellions and the Cold War. As a solution to these problems, Sukarno, the 1st president of Indonesia, suggested the return to the “Revolution (Revolusi).” In Indonesian history, Revolution refers to the anti-Dutch struggle for independence in 1945-49. Sukarno explicated that the Revolution was not over yet and the revolutionary spirit should be revived to accomplish the goal of Indonesian nation for an independent state, social justice, and a new international order. He suggested a new political system called “Guided Democracy” as an alternative to parliamentary democracy, which was often criticized as an western system unsuitable for Indonesian society. Under this system the political power was concentrated on the president, while political parties and parliaments were dissembles or transformed according to the governmental policy. Two political powers, the military forces and the communist party, grew rapidly in the absence of powerful parties, and the Guided Democracy was operated through the interplay between these two groups, while Sukarno working as an powerful arbiter between the two. However, increasing conflicts between the two archrivals eventually led to the collapse of the system and the emergence of Suharto’s “New Order.” The New Order abandoned the quest for Revolution, and was completely different from Sukarno’s government in its economic goals and international relations. Yet its basic political system - such as enormous power of the president and the role of functional groups – was inherited from Sukarno’s Guided Democracy. Ironically, the practices of a revolutionary political leader contributed to emergence of a most reactionary government.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        1950∼60년대 인도네시아의 정치적 혼란과 셀레베스 해(Celebes Sea) 밀무역

        여운경(Woonkyung Yeo) 한국문화역사지리학회 2014 문화 역사 지리 Vol.26 No.1

        본 논문은 1950∼60년대 셀레베스 해에서 성행했던, 술라웨시(인도네시아), 영국령 북보르네오(사바), 필리핀사이의 밀무역에서 파생된 복잡한 국제관계를 분석한다. 이 시기에 술라웨시와 필리핀의 천연자원(코프라)이 종종 북보르네오 항구 타오 타와우로 밀반출되었고, 그 반대급부로 쌀과 사치품이 반입되었다. 북보르네오 화인들, 인도네시아 선원들, 심지어 싱가포르와 홍콩 상인들까지 이 풍요로운 사업에 참여했고, 필리핀인들도 밀수꾼 흑은 해적으로 등장했다. 이렇듯 셀레베스 해의 밀무역은 이 지역 경제의 초국가적 성격과유동성을 잘 보여준다. 한편 밀무역은 프르메스타반란이나 인도네시아-말레이시아 분쟁과 같은 정치적 갈등, 그로 인한 국경의 강화(혹은 약화) 속에서 성쇠를 겪게 되었고, 특정 한 정치적 상황에서 각국은 자신의 이익에 따라 밀수에 대해 서로 다른 입장을 보인다. 셀레베스 해 밀무역의 구조와 그를 둘러싼 논란을 분석함으로써, 이 논문은 정치, 국경(형성)과 밀수의 관계를 다시 생각해본다. This article analyzes complex international relations formed by secret πade around the Celebes Sea, between Sulawesi (Indonesia), British North Borneo (Sabah), and the Philippines throughout the 1950s and 1960s. Throughout this period, natural products (mostly copra) of Sulawesi and the Philippines were frequently smuggled to Tawau, a North Borneo port adjacent to border, where rice and luxury goods were shipped to Sulawesi and the Philippines in return. In this lucrative business, Indonesian sailors, traders from Singapore and Hong Kong, let alone Chinese traders in the British North Borneo, were deeply involved. Filipinos also played a part, sometimes as smugglers, sometimes as pirates. As such, smuggling around the Celebes Sea testifies to the transnational character and mobility of the region's economy. In addition, the status of smuggling fluctuated with political conflict in and around Indonesia, such as the Permesta Rebellion and the Confrontation between Indonesia and Malaysia, and the subsequent strengthening(or weakening) of the border. The three states showed different standpoint towards the issue of smuggling, based on their own interest in specific political conditions. By investigating the structure of and debates over smuggling around the Celebes Sea, this article rethinks the connectedness between politics , border (formation) and smuggling.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼