http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
신경병증 통증모델에서 Edrophonium 과 Neostigmine 의 항이질통 효과
이동명,황재현,함경돈 대한마취과학회 1997 Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Vol.33 No.1
Background : Peripheral nerve injury may produce a syndrome consisting of spontaneous pain, allodynia and hyperpathia. Cholinesterase inhibitors are known to have an antinociceptive effect in hot plate and tail flick tests and to be mediated by spinal muscarinic system. The purpose of the current study was to determine the effect of intrathecally(i.t.) administered edrophonium and neostigmine on the touch-evoked allodynia and to identify the antagonism of antiallodynia in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Methods : Sprague Dawley rats were prepared with tight ligation of left L5/L6 spinal nerves with 6∼0 black silk and chronic lumbar intrathecal catheters. After obtaining the baseline hindpaw withdrawal scores, edrophonium(3∼100ug) or neostigmine(0.3∼10ug) was administered intrathecally. Tactile allodynia was measured using von Frey filaments and allodynic threshold was calculated by updown method. Motor dysfunction was assessed by observing righting/stepping reflex responses and abnormal weight bearing. Toamine the reversal of antiallodynia, muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine(10ug) or nicotinic receptor antagonist mecamylamine(10ug) was injected intrathecally 5 min. prior to injection of edrophonium or neostigmine. Results : I.t. edrophonium and i.t. neostigmine produced a dose dependent antagonism of allodynic state but had moderate to severe effect on motor weakness at doses of 3 and 10 g of neostigmine. Pretreatment with i.t. atropine yielded a complete antagonism of antiallodynia in both drugs, but i.t. mecamylamine did not significantly reverse incresed allodynic threshold. Conclusions : These experiments suggest that i.t. edrophonium or i.t. neostigmine produces a dose dependent antagonism on touch-evoked allodynia at the spinal level and this antagonism is likely due to spinal muscarinic system. (Korean J Anesthesiol 1997; 33: 33∼40)