http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 이주추쿠 (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Okeke Job Izuchukwu(오케케 좁 이주추쿠),Han, Hye-Kyoung(한혜경) 동북아시아문화학회 2020 동북아 문화연구 Vol.1 No.64
In July 2019, a trade rift broke out between South Korea and Japan, traced back to a long standing historical dispute over the treatment of Koreans during the Japanese colonial rule of the country. As the dispute bothers on history and national pride, national media in East Asia captured this feud from their different perspectives, which have wider implication for their immediate and wider audience around the world. This exploratory study aimed at investigating media framing of news of this recent conflict especially with recourse to operational context of the media organizations; whether operational context influenced news medias’ framing of the issues arising from the conflict. In this study, two broad contexts were considered: first, media in the primary context (the feuding countries); South Korea and Japan, and second, media in the secondary context (observant countries); China, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan etc. The study employed content analysis to determine framing of news reports selected from English language media organizations used in the study. Framing theory was utilized as the critical model towards understanding the issue under investigation. The result of our analysis showed that for South Korean government and media, historical issues of “slave labour” and “comfort women” etc. were dominant agendas they pushed. For Japan, their “trade restriction”, “1965 post war settlement” and its national “security measures” etc. were the main agendas they advanced in the media. For newsrooms in wider East Asia, apart from agendas of the feuding countries, regional concerns of security, peace and trade were also major concerns. Our analysis showed that nationalistic tendencies, newsroom ideals and loyalties did sometimes dictate what agenda is framed into news or left out, hence variation between South Korean and Japanese media outlets in the framing of the different agendas, as well as variation between Chinese media and the rest of democratic East Asia media.
-
우리 편의 이야기: 2019년 한국과 일본의 국제적 갈등에 대한 동아시아 영문 미디어들의 정치와 이해관계에 관한 프레임 연구
정다희,남인숙,이주추쿠,이현진 한국언론정보학회 2019 한국언론정보학회 학술대회 Vol.2019 No.11
Recently, a conflict broke, once again, between South Korea and Japan, traced back to the long standing historical dispute over treatment of Koreans during the Japanese colonial rule. This dispute bothers on history and national pride, but this time overflowed to trade and security issues. The national media in South East Asia captured these events as they unfolded from their national perspectives, which has wider implication for their immediate and wider audience around the world. This study aims at investigating media framing of this recent conflict in the light of operational context and national orientation of the media organizations. In this study, two media contexts are considered: first, media in the primary context (the feuding countries), Korea and Japan, and second, media in the secondary context (observant countries), China, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan etc. The study aims at investigating how media in these countries framed the issue in their reporting and OP-ED analysis (where it obtains). Towards this end, this study employs content analysis of newspaper contents; news and OP-ED/analysis, to determine framing of news reports and OP-EDs on this conflict in selected English language news media organizations in South East Asia countries. Framing theory is utilized as the critical model towards understanding the issue under investigation.
KCI
DBpia연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
