불당광고(不當廣告)로 인한 소비자피해의 사법적구제(私法的救濟)에 관한 연구 -인쇄물광고를 중심으로-

손수진 ( Soo Jin Son ) 한국법정책학회 2009 법과 정책연구 Vol.9 No.1

These days, consumers receive substantial amount of information about goods from advertisements. Consumers are highly unlikely to judge, assess, and discern objectively with his or her confined knowledge in a contemporary economic society. Accordingly, consumers are very much at the mercy of the information, i.e. advertisement, provided by business operators specialized in certain products. Sometimes, however, business operators intentionally give false impression on customers to boost the sales of their own goods by employing methods such as false advertisement, exaggerated advertisement and deceit advertisement. As a result, cases where the actual goods or services do not correspond with the advertisements although consumers have trusted the business operators` advertisements and concluded their contracts are being caused at an alarming rate. Such cases are generally in two forms; the case where performing as the information given on the advertisements is possible, and the case where performing as the information given on the advertisements is not possible. In the latter case, demanding the business operator to perform as the advertisements is virtually impossible and if the contractual relationship is sustained, monetary damage to consumer increases and its retrieval may not be possible. In such case, consumers first have to withdraw from the contractual relationship, i.e. the confinement of contractual duty. The methods to withdraw from the contractual relationship for those who have trusted the deceptive advertisements and concluded their contracts include revocation of the expression due to frauds, revocation of the expression due to mistake, and cancellation of a contract due to default. In the former case, performing as the information given on the advertisements by business operators is the most desirable solution to consumers. The reason why consumers concluded their contracts is that they expected acquisition of goods or services claimed on advertisements. The means to exact performance from the business operators as information given on the advertisement include warranty liability against defects and default liability. Thus, this paper has contemplated on the methods to exact performance from business operators as the advertisements or to withdraw from the contractual relationship for those who concluded their contracts based on deceptive advertisements.

복수노조의 교섭창구 단일화 제도에 관한 연구

손수진(Son, Soo-Jin) 한양법학회 2015 漢陽法學 Vol.26 No.3

As the "Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act" was amended in January 1, 2010, workers have become to establish multiple unions in a business or workplace unit from July 1, 2011. They prohibited workers from establishing multiple unions which have the same organization object, but now fully permit workers to establish multiple unions which have the same organization object. So workers can freely establish or register more than one union in a business or workplace without any restriction. Tolerance of multiple union is an institutional change that leads to a breakthrough transformation in the collective labor-management relations. It is a natural consequence because it defined the right to organize as a national basic rights of the Constitution. However, if there are two or more of union coexist in a business or workplace, and each exercises their own bargaining rights, there should be a few practical problems. The bottom line is that the problems are an unreasonable arise from undergoing application of different working conditions according to labor combination in the labor of the same or similar contents. Even though there are the conflict between the trade union and labor union as well as between labor unions and employers, the increase in the negotiation cost and reduction of negotiation efficiency. Revised "Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act" introduced the single bargaining channel system to solve these problems effectively. The single bargaining channel system"s rule is that all the labor union unify the single bargaining channel in a business or workplace and make the bargaining representative union negotiate with employers, so apply one collective agreement to one business or workplace. In spite of 4 years have passed after enforcement of this system, the detailed content of single bargaining channel system and management of the system are still very controversial. Therefore, I hope that this system can be fixed stably in the industrial field by examining the problem which is controversial or proved on the process of system enforcement in this study.

공정거래법상 전속고발제도에 관한 연구

손수진 ( Soo Jin Son ) 한국법정책학회 2011 법과 정책연구 Vol.11 No.1

전속고발제도는 공정거래법 위반행위에 대해 공정거래위원회가 전문기관으로서 상세한 시장분석 등을 통하여 위반행위의 경중을 판단하고 그 판단에 따라 형벌의 적용 여부를 결정하도록 하기 위하여 도입된 제도이다. 그러나 1981년부터 2009년까지 공정거래위원회가 검찰에 고발조치한 사건은 전체 사건의 1.45%에 불과하고, 공정거래법의 운용이 거의 대부분 행정절차로 처리됨에 따라 사업자나 일반인에게 있어서 공정거래법 위반행위에 대한 죄의식이 매우 희박한 것이 현실이다. 전속고발제도 및 공정거래위원회의 소극적인 고발권 행사로 인하여 공정거래법 위반행위에 대한 효과적인 제재와 예방에 한계가 있고, 전속고발제도에 대한 헌법재판소의 합헌결정 이후에도 위헌성 논란이 계속되고 전속고발제도를 폐지하여야 한다는 주장이 제기되고 있는 바, 전속고발제도는 폐지하는 것이 타당하다고 본다. 전속고발제도의 폐지는 피해자에 의한 고발을 가능하게 함으로써 공정거래법의 효과적인 집행과 그 실효성의 강화 차원에서도 바람직한 방향이라고 본다. 다만 피해자에 의한 고발권 행사의 남용 및 공정거래법 위반사건의 증가 등 전속고발제도의 폐지에 따라 발생할 수 있는 문제점을 해결하기 위하여 형사처벌대상 행위의 축소·조정, 검찰의 전문성 강화, 공정거래위원회와의 협조시스템 구축 등의 조치가 함께 이루어져야 할 것이다. The exclusive complaint system by only Fair Trade Commission under Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act was introduced for Fair Trade Commission to judge the seriousness of violations of Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act through detailed market analysis and to decide whether to apply penalties for the violations. But from 1981 to 2009, Events prosecuted to the prosecution by Fair Trade Commission are only 1.45% of total cases, and operation of Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act is treated almost as administrative procedures. Accordingly, a sense of guilt of businessman or the general public for violations of Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act is very small. Because of the exclusive complaint system by only Fair Trade Commission and the passive exercise of the right to accuse by Fair Trade Commission, it is difficult to take sanctions against violations of Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act and to prevent them effectively. And even after Constitutional Court decided that the exclusive complaint system by only The Fair Trade Commission is constitutional, Constitutional debates on the exclusive charge system have been continued and claims that the exclusive complaint system should be abolished have been raised. Therefore, It is reasonable to abolish the exclusive complaint system. If the exclusive complaint system is abolished, It is possible that the victim accuses the solicitation businessman directly, and it is possible that Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act is enforced effectively. However, in order to solve the problems caused by the abolition of the complaint system including the abuse of the right to accuse by victims and the increase of violations of Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act, measures should be taken together, such as reduction and coordination of criminal acts, enhance of the prosecutors` professionalism and construction of cooperation system with Fair Trade Commission.

EU 일반데이터보호규정(GDPR)에 대한 우리나라 기업의 대응방안

손영화(Son young hoa),손수진(Son soo jin) 한국비교사법학회 2019 비교사법 Vol.26 No.1

EU 일반데이터보호규정(General Data Protection Regulation : 이하 GDPR)은 유럽연합(EU)의 새로운 개인정보보호의 틀이자, 개인정보(personal data)의 처리와 이전에 관한 룰이다. EU 회원국에 대해서 직접 효력이 발생하는 법규제로서 GDPR은 2016년 4월에 제정되어 2018년 5월 25일부터 시행되고 있다. GDPR은 개인정보보호에 관한 권리라는 기본적 인권을 보호하는 것을 목적으로 한다(GDPR 제1조). GDPR은 우리나라 기업이 EU 거주자에게 직접 상품이나 서비스를 제공하면서 EU 거주자의 개인정보를 취급하는 경우, EU 역외의 사업자라 하더라도 동법의 적용대상이 된다(GDPR 제3조 「역외적용」). GDPR에서는 EU 역내기업으로부터 EU 역외의 제3국으로 개인정보를 반출하는 것이 원칙적으로 금지되어 있다(GDPR 제44조 「정보이전」). 또한 GDPR에는 우리나라 개인정보보호법에는 규정되어 있지 않거나 또는 우리나라 개인정보보호법보다 규제가 강화되고 있는 규정들이 있다. 고도로 글로벌화된 사회환경에서는 정보의 국경을 넘는 유통 및 활용이 불필요하게 방해받지 않는 것이 중요하다. 현행 GDPR에서의 정보 이전제한에 대해서 우리나라 기업의 상당수가 표준계약조항이나 본인 동의로 대처하고 있다. 우리 정부는 유럽위원회와 적정성 인정을 위한 대화를 잘 마무리 할 필요가 있다. 아직 적정성을 인정받지 못한 상태에서 EU와 거래하는 우리나라 기업으로서는 EU 개인정보보호법에 적합하기 위한 수단 즉, 표준계약조항(Standard Contractual Clauses : SCC)」 또는 구속적 기업준칙(Binding Corporate Rule : BCR)」 또는 본인으로부터 정보 이전에 관한 동의에 의하여 적정성을 인정받아 정보를 이전해야 한다. 또한 GDPR에서는 JEITA 등으로부터의 요망을 받아 「적절한 안전관리조치에 의한 제3국에의 정보 이전」의 한 가지 조치로서 「인증제도」가 추가되어 있다. 이것은 우리나라에서 보급되어 있는 제3자 인증제도를 이용한 국경을 넘는 정보 이전에의 길을 열어 둔 것이다. 우리나라 전체(혹은 민간분야 전체적으로) 적정성 인정에 장기간을 필요로 하게 되는 경우에는 차선책으로 우리나라에서 일정한 요건에 근거한 인증을 취득한 기업은 무조건 EU에서 정보 이전받을 수 있도록 하는 조치의 실현을 목표로 해야 할 것이다. The EU General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR) is a new personal information protection framework of the European Union(EU) and is a rule concerning the processing and relocation of personal data. GDPR has been enacted in April 2016 as a regulation that directly affects EU member states, and has been in effect since May 25, 2018. Where Korean companies deal with EU resident personal information while providing products and services directly to EU residents, will also be subject to GDPR (GDPR Article 3 "Extraterritorial Application"). In principle, GDPR prohibits the transfer of personal information from companies in the EU region to third countries outside the EU (Article 44 “Information Transfer" in GDPR). There is also provision in GDPR that regulations are not handled by Korea"s Personal Information Protection Act or regulation is enhanced by Korea"s Personal Information Protection Act. Regarding the limitation of data transfer in the current GDPR, a considerable number of Korean companies respond by standard contract clause or individual agreement. The Korean government needs to settle a dialogue with the European Commission to recognize adequacy. As a Korean company dealing with the EU in a state that adequacy has not yet been admitted, means for conformity with the EU Personal Information Protection Act, namely Standard Contractual Clauses (SCC) or binding company regulations (Binding Corporate Rule: BCR) or from the person himself / herself agreeing on data transfer, adequacy is recognized and information must be transferred. Also, in response to requests from JEITA, etc. in GDPR, “Certification system" has been added as one measure of “data transfer to third country by appropriate safety control measures". This opens the way for cross-border information transfer using the third-party certification system prevalent in our country. In the event that long-term assessment of adequacy is required for Korea as a whole (or for the private sector as a whole), in the next best practice, companies that have obtained certification based on certain requirements in Korea will be able to receive data transfer unconditional from the EU.

방송광고제도(放送廣告制度)의 헌법적(憲法的) 고찰(考察)

권형둔(Hyung Dun Kwon),손수진(Soo Jin Son) 중앙법학회 2007 中央法學 Vol.9 No.2

노인요양시설 주거부분 공유공간에 관한 연구

손수진,이특구 한국의료복지시설학회 1999 의료·복지 건축 Vol.5 No.9

Most of elderly residents who live in nursing home for a long time hale been suffering from chronic sickness. Therefore, residential part should be the place to recover social relationship, to get over isolation and to be able to make communication through contact of personal activities. The purpose of this study is to offer the guideline of planning and scale of the shared place which makes better housing environment of the elderly. also, the character of the elderly and element of environments appropriate for the frail elderly people were study.