http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
성기창 ( Ki Chang Seong ) 한국의료복지건축학회 2010 의료·복지 건축 Vol.16 No.4
Despite the growing interest in recreation as one of the ways to maintain physical and mental health in modem society, access to leisure facility is an issue for individuals with disabilities. This paper identifies inaccessible features to propose the ways to promote participation and usage of the leisure facilities for individuals with disabilities. A survey of individuals with disabilities is conducted to determine preferred leisure facilities depending on types of disabilities. The result of this survey is used to evaluate current condition of regulated National leisure facility and forest, which include barrier-free facilities (e.g. interconnecting zones, interior spaces, lavatories and other facilities), signage, approachable information kiosks, emergency egress, and detectable warnings. The common issues (e.g. guiding mechanism, accessible route, safety factors, and barrier-free facilities/services) in various types of recreational facilities (e.g. forest recreational center, spa and hot springs, Amusement Park, ski resort) were identified and analyzed.
제주지역 공공업무시설의 장애물 없는 생활환경 실태조사 연구
성기창 ( Seong Ki Chang ),박철민 ( Park Chul Min ),김인배 ( Kim In Bae ) 한국의료복지건축학회(구 한국의료복지시설학회) 2016 의료·복지 건축 Vol.22 No.4
Purpose: Considering the proportion of the population such as the elderly, pregnant women, infants companion and constantly increasing foreign tourists, there is a high need for implementing an environment without barriers. In terms of policy and institutional aspects, Jeju Special Self-Governing Province is striving to create an environment without barriers and to promote the safety and convenience of Vulnerable Pedestrians. But it is not enough to create a viable barrier-free environment. Methods: Method of this research is to analyze the general population status and installed facilities status for the disabled in Jeju. And analysis of policy research needs and level of barrier-free. By applying the barrier-free environment certification standards should conduct an assessment of the level of the current public office buildings in Jeju. It presents the environmental improvement of public office buildings for barrier-free environment. Result: Barrier-free environment status of the five public office buildings research surveyed all buildings have shown low levels of installed facilities for the disabled. In particular, it was analyzed that represents a very low level in the intermediate facilities and other facilities. The development of a specific installation manual for the facilities for the disabled is required to improve public office buildings. And barrier-free criteria need to reflect on the implementation of regulations. Implications: Through continuous research to analyze the barrier-free level and problems of public office buildings, it will be made to improve the comprehensive and reasonable alternative.
공공공간에서 유니버설디자인 적용의 우선순위에 대한 공간소비자와 생산자 간 분석
박청호 ( Park Cheong Ho ),성기창 ( Seong Ki Chang ) 디자인융복합학회(구.한국인포디자인학회) 2020 디자인융복합연구 Vol.19 No.4
본 연구의 목적은 유니버설디자인을 우선적으로 적용해야 하는 공공공간에 대해 공간소비자와 공간생산자 간 인식수준을 파악하는 것이다. 유니버설디자인 조례분석을 통해 공공공간을 3개 부문과 13개 영역, 그리고 23개 시설로 구조화했다. 집단별 우선순위에 대한 설문조사는 5점 리커트 척도를 이용해 진행했고 분산분석을 이용해 집단 간 우선순위를 파악하며, 공통점과 차이점을 유추했다. 공간소비자와 생산자는 대지 내공지영역과 공공업무시설, 공동주택, 건축물 진출입부, 자전거·보행자겸 용도로, 그리고 주차장·차량진출입부에서 차이를 보였다. 장애인과 비장애인, 그리고 전문가는 휴양영역과 대지 내 공지영역, 환경시설, 공동주택, 횡단보도 및 교차로, 보차혼용도로, 건축물 진출입부, 주차장·차량진출입부, 자전거·보행자겸용도로, 위생공간, 그리고 휴게 및 관람공간에서 차이를 보였다. 위의 결과는 장애인과 비장애인의 다양한 신체적 특징으로부터 기인했으며, 전문가도 그들에 대한 이해도가 높지 않음을 알 수 있었다. 이에, 다양한 공간소비자의 의견을 수렴할 수 있는 과정과 행동패턴 분석에 대한 연구, 공공재에 대한 인식개선의 필요성을 제안한다. The purpose of this study is to identify the level of perception between space consumers and space producers in public spaces where universal design should be applied first. The public spaces designated by Universal Design Ordinances were classified into 3 big-categories, 13 medium-categories and 23 small-categories. The survey on priorities by groups was conducted using a 5-likert scale, and the analysis of variance was used to identify priorities among groups, and commonalities and differences were derived. Space consumers and producers showed differences in the public empty area in the site, public works facilities, apartment house, entry and exit of buildings, bicycle and pedestrian dual-purpose roads, and entry and exit of parking lots and vehicles. The disabled, non-disabled, and experts showed differences in the leisure area, the public empty area in the site, environmental facilities, apartment house, crosswalks and intersections, sidewalk and road, entry and exit of buildings, bicycle and pedestrian dual-purpose roads, entry and exit of parking lots and vehicles, bicycle and pedestrian roads, sanitary areas, and rest and viewing spaces. The above results resulted from various physical characteristics of the disabled and the non-disabled, and even experts could see that their understanding of them was not high. Thus, the process of collecting opinions from various consumers and analyzing Behavior Patterns, and the need to improve awareness of less recognizable public space.