http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 변지연(Jee Yeon Byun) (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
생태주의의 쟁점과 그 문학적 적용의 문제 - 생태미학의 정립을 위한 기본 전제들 -
변지연(Byun Jee-Yeon) 우리문학회 2006 우리文學硏究 Vol.0 No.19
Eco-criticism occurred at the crisis of human's existence itself than by the pure yearning and compassion for 'nature'. But it has been gone through the concrete thinking procedures and finally arrived to demand the more fundamental epistemological awakening and a esthetic renovation. In short, now eco-criticism dreams of another revolution on the history of civilization and mentality which follows to "the Copernican revolution".<br/> But eco-criticism have many problems in its logic and practical persuasive power. For example, we can ask as following; Can we clarify the distinction between A contemporary eco-criticism and all sorts of pro-nature thinking which has been in Eastern and Western conventional notion in traditions? How can we connect modern eco-criticism with the past pro-nature tradition? If eco-criticism at these days cannot be distinguished from the past pro-nature tradition, can we admit it's identity or it's reason for being? And can it present us creative vision that get out of easygoing romanticism, empty idealism, and a notion about nature is polluted with wrong ideology?<br/> In the face of these difficult problems, eco-criticism have to answer very delicately and carefully. Most of all, it has possibility to be attack for the reason for excessive speciality on the one hand, and for abstract universality on the other. Therefore it will have to ask itself as following; Do we have to keep a position as a timely trend of thought through confining ourselves in narrow space like as 'materialism' or 'practical idea'? Or do we have to prove it's universal value by applying to many cultural fields so as philosophy, literature, arts, architecture etc., and by connecting past meaning texts freely with contemporary ones?<br/> But I don't think that we are now at the crossroad to choose between the two. Most of all, I think we need to recognize some similarities and differences between the two, and then we can link each other by creative view which is fit for new demand of the times.<br/> Besides, we have to something to answer as following: is the "life-centrism" of deep-ecologist "anti-humanism" so as M. Bookchin has been insist? Can we discriminate "nature" from "culture(or human)"?<br/> At this paper, I made an attempt to answer these difficult and complexed questions and efforted to clarify natures of nature and culture. And I try to examine the meaning and the essence of 'eco-literature'. Especially, It is necessary to watch with deep concern literary "mimesis" as like Adorno's concepts in examining ecologic nature of literary text or ecologic approach to literature.<br/> I hope this paper to be a solid base for a more creative discussion on eco-literature.
-
-
ScienceON연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
