http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
문원석(Moon, won Suk),변문태(Byun, Mun Tae) 한국무역상무학회 2010 貿易商務硏究 Vol.46 No.-
Multinational Enterprises set the prices for transactions between affiliates based principally on their global interest. But the customs authority in Korea wants to set the arm's length price as high as possible to get higher dutiable value for customs purpose, while the internal tax authority in Korea prefers lower arm's length price to get higher value for corporation tax purpose by cutting costs. Problem caused by the inconsistent valuation methods on the same imported goods of the two tax authorities is the single most important tax issue facing multinational enterprises. In the meantime, the customs authority in Korea has thought that it is a universal trend worldwide for the Customs and Internal tax authorities to adopt different methods of valuation on transfer prices between related parties, so KCS couldn't accept APA prices. But the internal tax authority in Korea has taken the initiative in APA program so NTS provided taxpayer with safe-harbor.Recently, KCS created the Advance Customs Valuation Arrangement(ACVA) provisions in the 2008 revision bill of the Customs Act through benchmarking APAs program. Can APAs work for customs? Neither WCO or OECD presents any recommendation on the integration of the valuation methods, but calls for close cooperation between two authorities, which still leaves taxpayers very unstable. We will start to seek ways to integrate the customs valuation and transfer pricing in this study.
문상태(Sang-Tae Moon),변문태(Mun-Tae Byun),정진용(Jin-Yong Chung) 한국관세학회 2016 관세학회지 Vol.17 No.2
It is inevitable that post adjustments are made to transfer prices determined in international sales transactions between related parties for tax purposes and that customs valuation issues arise in such transfer pricing adjustments. In regard to transfer pricing adjustments, multinational companies are faced with challenges due to different treatments or procedures implemented by customs authorities in different countries. In Korea, upward transfer pricing adjustments have been subject to additional duties based on the grounds that they are regarded as proceeds whereas no refunds have been granted on downward transfer pricing adjustments based on the grounds that they are not related to imported goods. Due to the inconsistency in treatments by the customs authorities on the same transfer pricing adjustment issue, taxpayers have expressed complaints. It is necessary that the Korean customs authorities set new policies on treatments and procedures in relation to transfer pricing adjustment to be in line with the trends in other countries such as the U.S. that have adopted more advanced system by acknowledging transfer pricing adjustments as the price actually paid or payable in case the adjustments are made according to a price adjustment agreement. Also, the Korean customs authorities need to consider granting refunds on downward transfer pricing adjustments. In order to have transfer pricing adjustments acknowledged as transaction value, taxpayers would also need to prepare transfer pricing policy prior to importation, adjust transfer prices in accordance with the transfer pricing policy and relevant regulations, and reflect the adjustments in accounting book and file tax reporting properly. Moreover, taxpayers should be able to submit supporting documents in relation to the goods subject to transfer pricing adjustments and its calculation basis upon request by the customs authorities. By doing so, conflicts between the customs authorities and the taxpayers will be reduced and instead cooperation by the taxpayers on customs administration will be enhanced.