
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
도시체계 관련 전통적인 연구 및 교육 주제에 대한 비판적 고찰: 순위규모법칙을 중심으로
박용하 한국도시지리학회 2025 한국도시지리학회지 Vol.28 No.2
본 연구는 도시규모분포를 설명하는 경험적 법칙인 순위규모법칙(혹은 Zipf 법칙)에 대한 폭넓은 문헌 분석을통해 최근의 연구 동향과 주요 쟁점을 종합적으로 정리하고, 이를 바탕으로 국내 도시지리학 연구 및 교육 영역에서 지속되어 온 이 법칙에 대한 관점과 접근 방식을 고찰하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 먼저 도시체계와 관련된 연구및 교육(관련 전공서 기반) 동향을 검토하여 순위규모법칙이 해당 분야에서 차지하는 위상을 파악하였다. 이어서 다양한 학제 간 연구 성과를 포함한 순위규모법칙 관련 문헌을 종합적으로 검토하고, 이를 토대로 국내 도시지리학 연구와교육 영역에서 고려해야 할 개선 방향을 도출하였다. 분석 결과, 다양한 학문 분야에서 도시규모분포를 대상으로 한 순위규모법칙의 이론적·실증적·탐색적 연구가 활발히 이루어져 왔으며, 도시의 공간적 경계, 표본추출 과정에서의 자료절단 기준, 지수 추정 방법 등 법칙의 적용 과정 전반에서 다양한 쟁점이 제기되어 왔음을 확인하였다. 그러나 국내에서는 이 법칙과 관련된 연구 범위가 제한적이고, 주요 쟁점들에 대한 논의도 상대적으로 부족하였다. 교육 영역에서도법칙의 기능적 활용에 치중하는 경향이 두드러졌으며, 불균등한 도시규모분포를 가리키는 ‘종주’ 개념의 혼용 문제 역시 개선이 필요한 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 순위규모법칙에 대한 포괄적인 문헌 검토를 통해 도시지리학 연구와 교육에서 해당 법칙을 보다 심층적이고 균형 있게 다룰 수 있는 기반을 마련하였다는 점에서 학술적 의의를 갖는다. The purpose of this study is to conduct a comprehensive literature review of the rank-size rule(or Zipf’s law)—an empirical law that explains city-size distributions—in order to synthesize recent research trends and key issues, and to explore ways to improve the long-standing perspectives and approaches to this rule in Korean urban geography research and education. To this end, the study first analyzes the research and educational trends related to urban systems to identify the position of the rank-size rule within the field. It then reviews a wide range of interdisciplinary literature on the rank-size rule and propose directions for improvement in the Korean context. The results reveal that the rank-size rule has been a subject of active theoretical, empirical, and exploratory research not only in urban geography but also in disciplines such as economics and physics, with key issues raised throughout its application process, including the definition of urban boundaries, sample truncation criteria, and coefficient estimation methods. However, in South Korea, the scope of research on the rank-size rule has remained relatively limited, with insufficient discussion of these key issues. In the realm of education, attention has been largely focused on the functional applications of the rule, while conceptual confusion surrounding the notion of “primacy” to describe unequal city-size distributions still persists. This study offers a foundation for addressing the rank-size rule in a more in-depth and balanced manner within both research and education in urban geography.
보호지역의 지속가능한 이용 및 관리 -지역의 생태,경제,사회적 특이성을 기반으로 한 접근
박용하,전성우,엄정희,홍현정,최현아,변병설 한국환경연구원 2012 녹색성장연구보고서 Vol.2012 No.-
Analysis of ecological and socio-economic changes was attempted in and around protected areas to provide rational policy direction and a strategy for sustainable use and management of protected areas. Out of 8 Ecosystem-and-landscape conservation areas, 12 Wetland protected areas, 20 National Parks in Korea, 6 protected areas were chosen by use of the K-Means clustering analysis. For the analysis, 23 and 31 factors for designation and release of the protected areas were chosen, respectively. The 6 protected areas chosen were Soraksan National Park, Dadohaehaesang National Park, Donggang ecosystem-and-landscape conservation area, Upo wetland protected area, and Nakdonggang estuary wetland protected area. Then, biodiversity of the 6 protected areas were appraised by use of GIS-based spatio-temporal patterns of landcover maps, environmental conservation value assessment maps, and forest type maps. Socio-economic changes of the areas were appraised based on a survey from July 16, 2012 to August 19, 2012. Three groups of local residents, experts, and government officials (total 512 people) were chosen for the survey. The results were analyzed using Likert scales. Ecological and socio-economic changes of the 6 protected areas show different regional characteristics as follows. First, biodiversity in most of protected areas was improved since designation of the protected areas. Second, biodiversity in most of released protected area sites are threatened and decreased. Third, released protected area sites aggravate or threat biodiversity in and around the protected areas. Fourth, most of local residents acknowledge that protected areas policy damages their private property right in protected areas. Hence, they think designation of privately-owned land as protected areas is not necessary for natural environment conservation. Fifth, local residents, however, living at the released protected area sites acknowledge that economic conditions were not significantly improved after releasing sites from protected areas. Sixth, government officials, experts and local residents have different opinions on protected area policy and management system. Seventh, ecological, economic and social changes in designated or released protected area sites show different sites-by-sites characteristics depending on geographic location, environmental condition, and designation or release time the protected areas. For example, public perception of protected area policy is different between people in Upo Wetland and Nakdonggang estuary Wetland protected area governed by Wetland law. Local residents play an important role in biodiversity conservation and sustainable use of protected areas. It has been proved with many case-studies in USA, UK, Germany, Japan, and Australia as well as international programs of Convention on Biological Diversity, IUCN, and UNESCO. These case-studies emphasized good governance with government, public organization, community and local residents` participation and cooperation. For sustainable use and management of protected area, local residents` participation is critical for biodiversity conservation of protected areas. Research on the valuing protected areas services, monitoring biodiversity and providing related information to local residents should follows. Protected areas management plan, rational decision-making process of major issues, implementation, operational processes, roles and responsibilities (rights) to local residents should be established. Raising public awareness and understanding value of protected area and it`s sustainable use will be parts of good governance. Programs including campaign, project, event and utilizing media for local residents should be activated. In addition, it is necessary to establish a legal system which supports local residents` participation, improves economic and social value of protected areas, and shares benefits with local residents.