http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 박근후 (검색결과 34 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
한국 국회에서의 효율적 의안심의를 위한 의안회부제도에 관한 연구
박근후 한국정책학회 1999 韓國政策學會報 Vol.8 No.1
국회입법과정에서 의안회부는 의안심의에 중요한 영향을 준다. 그러나 의안회부에 대한 관심이 그리 활발한 편은 아니다. 근래 들어 여러 영역을 동시에 포괄하는 내용을 가진 의안들이 많아지고 있다. 그럼에도 한국국회는 이런 의안들의 회부와 심의방법을 적절히 강구하지 못하고 있다. 1991년 개정된 국회법은 복수영역에 관련된 의안의 심의를 위해 관련위원회 회부제도를 신설하였다. 그 결과 관련위원회로 의안을 회부하는 건수는 급증하고 있으나 관련위원회가 의견을 제시하지 않는 등 의안심의에 별 도움을 주지 못하고 있는 형편이다. 극단적인 경우는 유사한 내용을 다루는 상이한 이름의 의안이 서로 다른 위원회에 회부되어 심의됨으로써 상충되는 내용을 의결하기도 한다. 이 경우 각 위원회는 다른 의안에 대한 관련위원회로 지정되어도 의견을 제시하지 않고 자신이 소관하는 의안만을 의결하는 현상도 나타난다. 이 논문은 한국국회에서의 의안회부제도를 검토하고, 실제 사례의 연구를 통해 의안심의과정에서의 문제점을 밝혔다. 나아가 효율적인 의안심의를 위한 의안회부제도를 제안하였다. 이는 국회에서 의안회부의 실제에 도움을 줄 것으로 기대한다.
-
朴根厚 관동대학교 1996 關大論文集 Vol.24 No.2
When a bill becomes a law, it should have validity and feasibility. Validity means that the content of a law reflect the norm which is the people-agreed value. Feasibility means that a law should be able to be formulated and implemented timely. In order that a law has validity and feasibility in the bill can have a chance to participate in the legislation process. The special process means that expert should consider the bill. This article begins with the premise the legislation process should be democratic and special. Under this premise, I try to find which are the problems in the legislative process of the Korean National Assembly and to suggest ideas which can improve the legislation process in the Korean National Assembly. Legislation process is compased of introducing a bill, refering it to committee, deliberating it in the standing committee, considering it in the Legislation and Justice Committee, and voting on a bill in the plenary session. The more congressmen introduce a bills which are submitted by congressmen are hard to pass during the deliberation. It is because the bill was not made by expert and lacks validity and feasibility. The way one bill refers to only one committee is apt to lack the speciality and miss the chance to get the different opinion. It disturb to make law democratically and specially to present several bills too committees simultaniously. The purpose of a bill and it is considered after the deliberation of standing committee. In order that a low get validity and feasibility, the legislation process should be democratic and special. And some suggestions can make legislation process democratic and special. Special institution which support and advise congressmen to make a bill should be made in the Korean National Assembly. Referrals should be specialized as multiple referrals, joint split referrals, sequential referrals in order to consider a bill by different and reflect different opinion. The system·wording consideration to consideration should be made during the deliberation of the competent standing committee and the system·wording consideration institution should be made in the Secretariat of the Korean National Assembly.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
朴根厚 관동대학교 1998 關大論文集 Vol.26 No.1
Policy evaluation is an applied endeavor to produce policy relevant information. It can use multiple methods. But the empirical approach to plicy evaluation which is on the foundation of positivism prevails. Under the positivist methods, policy evaluation don't treat the partisan goal or value conflicts associated with policy issues. It only calculate the efficiency and effectiveness or means to achieve goals. Positivist knowledge also seek generalizable knowledge to solve social problems. Policy evaluation under the positivism limits the area of the policy evaluation. Public policy is the political agreement process to achieve the good society. So public policy contain the value argument about the good society. But the positivism take the value question beyond the relam of policy evaluation. However public policy process is the only special environment which does not repeat. So the public policy study should focus on the only environment in which public policy is processed. But the positivism focus on the generalized knowledge rather than the specific knowledge which fits to the special public policy environment to evaluate the policy. This is the other problem of the policy evaluation under the positivism. Policy evaluation should take multimethodological approach which extend from concrete empirical questions pertinent to a particular situation to the abstract normative issues concerning a way of life. The logic of policy evaluation consists of four level, which are the verification, validation, vindication and social choice. Verification concerns with the measurement of the efficiency of program outcomes, validation is interested in the particular program objective's relevance to the situation. Vindication concerns policy goal addresses a valuable function for the existing societal arrangements. Social choice seeks to find out the concepts of a rational way of life and the good society. These four level should be integrated into the area of policy evaluation. When we evaluate the program and policy by all four level(verification, validation, vindication, social choice), we can say it policy evaluation.' In future, various methodologies which offer concrete method should be developed for each level of policy evaluation and we should try to apply those methods to evaluate real policy and program.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
