http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 미즈카미 마사하루 (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
오타 긴죠(大田錦城)의 경학(經學)에 관해서 -에도의 절충학(折衷學)과 청대(淸代)의 한송겸채학(漢宋兼採學)-
미즈카미마사하루 ( Mizukami Masaharu ) 다산학술문화재단 2007 다산학 Vol.- No.11
OTA Kinjo(1765~1825) was a famous Japanese evidential scholar of Confucius classics. Although he advocated Han- and Song-Learning syncretism, most scholars who studied about him have thus far focused on his accomplishment in evidential research. This paper casts light on Kinjo`s syncretism by comparing the scholarship of Kinjo with that of contemporary Chinese scholars of the 18th century who are regarded to have advocated Han- and Song-Learning syncretism. Through careful consideration, the following results have been obtained: (1) Contemporary evidential scholars regarded as advocates of Han- and Song-Learning syncretism in China are not actually eclectic, because they scarcely mention the writings of Song scholars and they reject the philosophical orientation toward the Classics which the scholars advocating Song-Learning were in favor of. (2) On the other hands, Kinjo often mentioned the writings of the Song scholars and was much interested in the topics they dealt with. His learning deserves to be counted as “Han- and Song-Learning syncretism.” (3) The learning of Kinjo has many common characteristics with that of the scholars in the early Qing era. One factor of that is that he could read few writings of contemporary(mid-Qing) scholars, although he could read many writings of early Qing scholars.
-
오타 긴죠(大田錦城)의 경학經學에 관해서- 에도의 절충학折衷學과 청대淸代의 한송겸채학漢宋兼採學-
미즈카미 마사하루 재단법인다산학술문화재단 2007 다산학 Vol.- No.11
OTA Kinjo(1765~1825) was a famous Japanese evidential scholar of Confucius classics. Although he advocated Han- and Song-Learning syncretism, most scholars who studied about him have thus far focused on his accomplishment in evidential research. This paper casts light on Kinjo’s syncretism by comparing the scholarship of Kinjo with that of contemporary Chinese scholars of the 18th century who are regarded to have advocated Han- and Song-Learning syncretism. Through careful consideration, the following results have been obtained: (1) Contemporary evidential scholars regarded as advocates of Han- and Song-Learning syncretism in China are not actually eclectic, because they scarcely mention the writings of Song scholars and they reject the philosophical orientation toward the Classics which the scholars advocating Song-Learning were in favor of. (2) On the other hands, Kinjo often mentioned the writings of the Song scholars and was much interested in the topics they dealt with. His learning deserves to be counted as “Han- and Song-Learning syncretism.” (3) The learning of Kinjo has many common characteristics with that of the scholars in the early Qing era. One factor of that is that he could read few writings of contemporary(mid-Qing) scholars, although he could read many writings of early Qing scholars.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
